 We're now being joined by a political analyst, Beaudon Showme. Many thanks for joining us on the news, Beaudon Showme. Yeah, I'm pleased to be with you. All right, let's just get your candid opinion concerning this new discovery concerning the 13-billionaire ecoillude. It is really amazing to find out that the EFC's accountant has actually been indicted in this particular mess, as it were, still in 10.9 billionaire. What are your thoughts exactly? You know, it's quite very shocking that an accountant with the EFC will have the audacity to note the kind of only alleged that he has looted 10-billionaire out of the 13-billionaire discovered in 60,000 allegedly trade for Nigerian intelligence agents, NIAs. Why would the accountant, even imagine that, would choose to do that kind of money for all the money without anybody, you know, without any fear of any backlash or what not? That would send the club club caught in the courts. Not only that, it also tells you that there is no way that the accountant in the U.S. can carry out 40 acts without the puny bans of one or two for that to be within the EFC. So it's important for this matter to be totally investigated and we need to get the group of all those bump-a-bots, you know, needs to be dealt with. We cannot just assume to do that. We cannot just put 10-billionaire below that puny bans of any other senior staff or junior staff. So this is a matter that cannot be investigated by the EFC and in my view, it's a matter that should be transferred to a different major company or S&P, special company, you know, to look into this motion. You cannot just force the EFC to move, you know, to investigate itself. Then it also calls for the needs to audit all the different things so far to see the extent of the bridge of those things that had happened under the different leadership of the EFC. I'd like to show me, it has been quite some time since there's a 13-billionaire equivalent. Like you have rightly pointed out, this goes just beyond the EFC's account and you've just said that other top members of the EFC or maybe other authorities might be involved. In your opinion, why do you think this particular issue is taking too long to be investigated? Are we developed? I asked, in your opinion, why do you think that this particular issue of a 13-billionaire equivalent is taking so long to be investigated? You have just rightly said that it goes beyond just the EFC's accountant and other parties might have been involved. What exactly is this really telling us about the investigating process? I think that it. I'm having a problem with the EFC. It's on things. All right, once again, I'll try and see if you can... Let's try and rephrase the question in another way. I wanted to get your candid opinion concerning why this particular investigation is taking so long. Indeed, there is a discovery today that the accountant stole 10.9-billionaire. What exactly is happening? What do you think is the body language of the EFCC? Why has it really taken for so long for this particular issue to happen on Ravodan to be sorted out completely? Yeah, precisely. I guess your question is, why did it take so long for this to be detected? Yes, yes. And in one of the fascinating things, when that calls for the need for checks and balance, we cannot just force the EFCC officials that they build methods to do the right thing. Yes, we cannot... Very many of the officers are completely but good officers who are willing to do the right thing. But you still have the bad ex. This is Nigeria. There's still a few bad exes going through the system that needs to be checked. And they're quite popular, you know, by far, with people. So therefore, there's a need for checks and balance for one part. On the other hand, I also explained the national assembly because they have to provide control. So bad ex. appears. So why is it that the national assembly is not in the sport, this bloke, or the father is in the field, allegedly, you know, when they're carrying out their oversight? Or is it that they've not carried out oversight controls on the US situation? Do they keep approving, you know, appropriating funds, public funds? For years to be here and here out, is that a proper oversight control? By checking, you know, so that people are, you know, and not again be needed. So in a way, it tells me a lot about the state of the nation, the state of provincial institutions, the lack of checks and balance, and corruption within the system. So we need to begin to tighten up, you know, on the full set, whereby it is not only those who are supposed to carry out the oversight control, you know, that should be held accountable, but also those who are appropriating funds without, you know, cross-checking how those funds are being paid. You know, especially held accountable. That's the policy delimitation. So what were they doing? We need to begin to ask more questions. Well, thank you so much, Barista, Bjardo, show me a political analyst for your thoughts on the news tonight. We do appreciate it. Hello, hope you enjoyed the news. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.