 Welcome to Planting Commission members, staff and guests. This is the Planning Commission meeting of the City of Columbia for April 5th, 2021. We ask for your patience during this virtual meeting. Multiple staff members are behind the scenes with us today are Lucinda Statler, Planning Administrator, Rachel Bailey, Zoning Administrator, Jonathan Chambers, Land Development Administrator, and Andrew Chambers. We ask for your patience during this virtual meeting. We ask for your patience during this virtual meeting. During the meeting you will see live images or still images of Planning Commission members and the Administrator, however, images of the applicant and the public will not be visible. The public will be able to participate via free methods in addition to watching the meeting. The public may stream the meetings through City TV accessed at www.youtube.com slash user slash Columbia SC government. The public may submit letters and statements via email to COC board meeting at Columbia SC dot gov leading up to and or during the meeting as this account will be monitored during the meetings. The public may participate via phone. You may call 855-925-2801 and when prompted please enter the meeting code 3506. I'll go ahead and do a roll call. Mr. Frost. Here. Ms. James. Mr. Cohn. Here. Ms. Davis. Here. Mr. Hart. Ms. Hart. Here. Ms. Thomas. Here. Mr. Tupper. Here. And we have a quorum. Mr. Chairman, if you don't mind, I'd like to note a couple of changes to the agenda publication. Okay, great. On the original case number 11, which is a street name change SN dash 2021 dash 001 has been deferred as well as case 13, which is a site plan review SPLAT dash 2021 dash 0012. This is for the point at Chestnut Hill Plantation has also been deferred. Do we need a motion or anything except in the new agenda or? I don't think so. I think we can just proceed. Okay. With those deferred items as noted. So I'll give a brief meeting overview. Applicants with requests before the planning commission are allotted a presentation time of 10 minutes. This time should include but is not limited to an overview of the project case history and any pertinent meetings held this time. This time also includes all persons presenting information on behalf of the applicant such as attorneys, engineers and architects. This time limit does not include any questions asked by planning commission or staff regarding requests. Members of the general public are given the opportunity to address their concerns and intervals of two minutes. This time limit does not include any questions asked by presenters aware of when their time has expired. Planning commission reserves the right to amend these procedures on a case-by-case basis. The consent agenda to approve non-controversial or routine matters by a single motion and vote. Examples of such items include approval of site plans, annexations and street names that the general public will discuss an item on the consent agenda. That item is removed from the consent agenda and considered during the meeting. The planning commission then approves the remaining consent agenda items. So to start off on the consent agenda the first item is the approval of the March 1st 2021 minutes and then under the future land use map amendments that the general public will approve. The next item is the recommendation. Case number 2 which is a 2213 apple valley. This is a request for recommendation to assign land use classification of urban edge residential large lot and assigned zoning of general residential district for pending annexation. The property is currently classified as neighborhood and zoned RS HD by Richland County. Case number 4 is an 80 acre portion on the north side of Percival Road. The addresses are 40 to 40 acres. The next item is the approval of the March 1st 2021 minutes and then under the future land use map amendments that the general public will approve. The next item is the approval of the March 1st 2021 minutes and then under the future land use map amendments that the general public will approve. The addresses are 4621 4635 4651 and 4655 Percival Road request recommendation to assign land use classification of urban edge residential large lot and assigned zoning of single family residential district for pending annexation. The property is currently classified as mixed residential high density and zoned RS MD by Richland County. Under site plan reviews, case number 6 is a land use classification of urban edge residential large lot by Richland County. Under site plan reviews, case number 6 at 366 Lake Murray Boulevard request site plan approval for the construction of an 8,010 square foot medical office building for scent land holdings. The property is zoned L.S. large scale plan development. Case number 7 88 unit multifamily development to colonial creek apartments. The property is zoned RD2 general residential. Under zoning map amendments, case number 8 707 request to resend the parcel from heavy industrial plan development district to office and industrial district plan development district. Case number 9 is 1041 ponderosa point drive a request to resend the parcel from light industrial district to heavy industrial district. And those are all the items on the consent agenda. Thank you, Lucinda. So we've heard the consent agenda. Is there anyone from the planning commission that would like any item removed from the consent agenda hearing nine minutes? Is there anyone from the public that would like to have an item removed from the consent agenda when participating? Please provide your name for the minutes. You can communicate by sending an email to c-o-c board meeting at columbia-sc.gov. Please communicate via phone by pressing star two to leave a message. Please speak in person. We will pause to allow communication from the public. Again, the phone number is 855 925 2801 and the meeting code is 3506. Hello, Mr. Frost. Yes. I currently do not have any speakers that have any case they want to speak. Okay. I have no e-mails. Okay. No speakers on the line with no e-mails regarding the consent agenda. I'll entertain a motion. I move that we accept the consent agenda. This is Dr. Mandel. Got a motion. Can I get a second? I'll second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. The ayes have it. The consent agenda is approved. The planning commission will now move forward with those items on the regular agenda. We will use the following outline for regular agenda items. The administrator will introduce the case. The applicant will have 10 minutes to make a presentation. Planning commission may ask questions. The public will be allowed to participate via e-mail, voicemail, in person or via the web. Planning commission may ask additional questions of the applicant. Then we will take action by the planning commission. The next item on the agenda, item number 10, is for the concrete point hd, and it's currently a plan development, residential district, they are hoping to rezone to general residential with a portion of general commercial along Bluff road. So it includes addresses along Bluff, Atlas, Cullover Road, Beamer Loop, Hungry Point Drive, Jerry Lane, as well as addresses along Point Set Loop. So, and this is an undeveloped planned unit development that they're just hoping to rezone to where, to base zoning districts so that they can do some development. So, and staff can answer questions as well as I believe the applicant is on the line as well. Okay, does the applicant wanna speak regarding the request? If the applicant is here, I'd be interested in just hearing a brief discussion of what they're wanting to do. So, and I shouldn't say the applicant, a representative for Bible Way Church, which has the PUD. So, DJ, are you on the line? Yes, I'm here. Can everybody hear me? Sorry, I was on mute. Yes. Yes, sir. So, we're looking at to, and I don't know, we have Michael Healy from Dominion who might be on the line to give you some more information on what we're looking to develop. He's our developing partner with the Bible Way Church of Atlas Road, but we're looking to create some senior housing. And I will let Michael take over from here, but it's a partnership with them to develop some senior housing along the Atlas Road and Fluff Road corridor. Hey, DJ, this is Nick Anderson with Dominion. I'm also on the line and I can take that and I guess provide an introduction to us and to the senior housing we have planned for the site. We have been working with DJ and the church on a rectangular shaped parcel that is furthest to the, I guess, northeast on the map that is shown there. So it's the rectangular shaped piece that is directly across the street from the parking lot of the church. What we have planned for that piece is a 196 unit senior affordable housing project. The project would be a four-story building with elevators. We would do one and two bedroom apartment units and rents would range roughly from about $75 to just under $900 depending on if it's a one or two bedroom apartment. We would also include as part of the project a community room, a fitness center. We have typically a card and craft room as part of this. We have a library and business center. So it's a really amenity rich project that we're thinking here. And we have provided to DJ some examples of other projects that we've developed recently that sort of shows what that space looks like. But that's the general plan for the site there that's kind of furthest to the northeast on the image that you're seeing on the screen now. And Dominium, just by way of background, we have a Southeast region development office that's based in Atlanta. So Mike Healy and myself, Nick Anderson, who are on the line. We work out of our Atlanta office and cover the Columbia market for our company. We don't have a large South Carolina area we don't have a large South Carolina presence right now but we do own and manage some projects in the Buford Hilton Head area. This would be our first in Columbia but we're not new to this type of project. We have a 50 year history in affordable housing. We have a long history of doing this type of housing. So we're very experienced at it and very capable of doing a project like this of this size and magnitude and everything. So we just wanted to be available for questions and kind of give that overview to the extent that there are any questions from the commissioners would be happy to address anything you guys have. And this is DJ from Bob away church. Originally we had a put that was restrictive and so we're just trying to just revise the put so that we can implement this project. I think a year or so ago or is that Rachel and Tim can let us know we revised the put because we're in talks with another development that's taking place with workforce housing on the opposite end of the senior housing within this 80 or so acres we have surrounding the church. And just to clarify this isn't revising the put this is getting rid of the put in 2017. They did carve out the portion that you see is our G2. They carved that out of the planned unit development and instead of continuing to just carve it up after a lot of meetings we all felt it best to just remove the planned unit development so they're not tied to such specific development. So we're just trying to figure out how we can implement patterns in the area that no longer are really applicable or in demand. Thank you staff and the applicants. I appreciate that planning commission. Do you have any follow up questions for the applicant or staff. I have a question. This is Harris come the portion of the existing plan. What is the plan is that going to also go to see three or is that it may be in there. I can't remember where I might have seen that. The portion along bluff road will become C3 while the rest of the PUD becomes RG2. Okay. What is the primary difference in the put as it is now compared to the RG2. It has very specific locations for where certain development is supposed to go. So it's supposed to go in one area. Town homes, garden homes. It's very, very specific in its site plan. So it hinders flexibility. Okay. The portion. One part is already C3 and then on bluff road and then that part extended up will also but also go to C3. Yeah. The C3 was one that was annexed in and so it'll continue on along bluff road just to give some options for because there was a commercial component to the PUD anyway. So it just gives some flexibility there. Thank you. Yep. And I assume that the neighborhood was notified and all of the appropriate signage was. Placed. Yes, we've gotten a lot of calls where we explained that. And there wasn't any. Particular feedback or. Not that I'm aware of most of the calls my staff fielded were just general, what is this? Just making sure it was nothing crazy. So we didn't get any off specific opposition. Okay. And so you know that the church has been working closely with the, the neighborhood and the surrounding community. And the neighborhood is being used as a temporary point, which is the Nate neighborhood adjacent to the property. And the church is directly across the street. So we've been working closely with them just to. So that they are aware of everything that's taken place. Great. Any other questions from planning commission? Yes. I have a brief question. As noted, there's 106 acres of land that's included in this. And I'm a part missing across the street from the church. And can you briefly tell me about what, what's in the rest of the property? I can address the. First part of the question, the senior apartment community that we have planned would be built on 12 acres. And then as far as the plan for the rest of the site, I would have to defer to DJ. And so the current property that's already zoned for our RG to, I believe it is. We are developing workforce housing with about 15 acres, 15 to 20 acres of that, with about 200 workforce development. Apartments there as well. And there is a planning going on right now, but nothing is concrete for, for the rest of the development. Thank you. Any additional questions at this time before we go to. So we'll go ahead and get a public comment. Again, we encourage those who would like to comment via email or the web to begin sending in letters and emails. Email should be sent to COC board meeting. At Columbia SC.gov. Or on the web at. HTTPS. Colin. Ford slash Ford slash public input. Dot com slash COC. PC dash. April or APR 2021. For those wanting to leave a voicemail or speak live, please call 855-925-2801. And when prompted, please enter the meeting code 3506. Then you may press star two to leave a voicemail. Or press star three to speak live. Please be sure your computer audio is off to avoid any feedback. We'll give a brief minute to wait to see if any feedback or comments come in via email or phone call. I'm not seeing any emails come through. Okay. And likewise, I do not have any callers wish to speak. Okay. No emails and no callers on the line. I'm not seeing any calls. I'm not seeing any calls. Still no new correspondence, right? And any last follow up questions from planning commission. This is Harris. Is there. Rachel. No more on this. With the property backing up to the Columbia industrial part. Will that becoming a residential use. Place or impose. Any challenges on the people in that part. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. Is there going to buffers or setbacks. The plan unit development had residential in that area as well. It was a very residential heavy. PUD. So. Some landscaping may come into play, but if there's already developed parcels, it's not going to affect those. So, I mean, if there's already businesses in place in the industrial park, we're going to be doing that. So, we have a lot of this kind of work. I don't think there's going to be a ton of new developments. We don't have any new developments there. They won't, we won't change it or make it more intense. Any. Any other questions. Hearing none. I'll accept the motion. Anyone want to throw a motion out there. Mr. Chairman. Put a motion out to prove the number 10 on agenda. Can I get a second? Second. Got a motion and a second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed say no. Yeah, I'll have it. The motion is approved. All right, that's going to take us to the site plan that's at 3452 North Main Street, 3500 North Main Street, 1217 Sunset Drive. And 1205 through 1211 Phillip Street. Various TMS numbers. 09112-06-06. 09112-06-07. 109112-07-01. And 09112-07-06. And this is a proposal for the North Main Brewery, which is a mixed use development. And the project will entail the renovation of a 66,000 square foot manufacturing building that will contain a brewery, a tap room fitness center and a catering facility. It will also instill the construction of a 50,000 square foot three-story office building in the demolition of an existing building to create a parking line. The site plan, once you look at the site plan, you will be able to see here. Looking at the site plan, you will see that it entails part of the Avondale right-of-way, which is owned by SC DOT, as well as the city of Columbia as DOT. The city of Columbia, Phillip Street right-of-way, which will be utilized for parking. And I just want to, you know, for the record, that process will be handled through court action. And, but it is also a path for starting the Phillip Street closure. And we have informed them that, of course, that is part of the court action procedure. Due to the size of the development, we've requested a traffic impact study. And the traffic impact study, it's our understanding is underway, but it is not complete yet. And so staff has asked that if the commission considers this request that they give it a deferral until the next month, until we receive the traffic impact study. There are several comments in the case summary. And a lot of them are general in nature. Staff is generally favorable of the request. But again, we're waiting to see what the traffic impact study states with regards to off-site improvements and things of that nature. The applicant is present and I can believe, can explain their case if staff, if the commission doesn't have any questions for staff. So just to clarify, the planning department is asking for a deferral on this. Correct. Pending the traffic impact study, we have not received the traffic impact study yet. So we, from a staff perspective, we can't recommend approval of it waiting on that. Right. So we don't have it yet. Correct. We will have it next month and we could discuss it then. Correct. Okay. All right. So we've heard, Mr. Chambers, do we have any questions, any additional questions for staff before hearing from the applicant? Here at nine, if the applicants available, we'd love to hear any, any additional information. That's. Yeah. Can you hear me? This is, this is white Burnett. I'm a civil engineer with the land plan group. I'm the applicant, but I'm actually going to turn the floor over to Scott. I'm going to turn the floor over to Scott Middleton, who's the developer right now. So he can give you kind of an overview of the project. Then I'll come back online and kind of give you an overview of the actual site. And then can maybe answer some of your questions. Regarding Johnson's comments. So Scott, do you want to kind of give them a brief overview? And then I'll come back online and talk about the site specifics. Okay. I'm a little bit confused because we understood that the staff was a little upset about that. And we had been talking to the city all week, and that was not part of the plan. So I guess we knew need to address that at some point, because there, a lot of this is very time sensitive for us to move forward with this project. So, but just to give you a quick overview, this 62,000 square foot building, which was stone manufacturing company has been vacant for a large number of years. And the city and the community have been looking for something to put in it. It's an historic building that has already been approved for federal tax credits for the historic. It's a large space and it was really difficult really to find the right project to go into this space to be able to utilize appropriately. So we finally settled on putting a brewery in that space and have really been working diligently for almost the last two years on this project. Then as part of that project right makes door to it, we've decided because now it's an opportunity to move our pretty large South Carolina house calls, which is a business that and building an office building. So we have a 53 square foot office building planned on that site that will bring South Carolina house calls and South Carolina, the house called business employee on site about 350 people, but it will bring to the city into into the county about 650 jobs that will be related to this particular building. So that's really kind of the brief overview of it. It's a large complex, large piece of property. And in order to incorporate the proper, the parking areas for both of those businesses, we really needed to have that expanded space, which would call for the closing of Phillips and have it now. And I can get back into some of the site specifics. Scott did a good job of explaining, I guess the overall project. Jonathan, if you want to go and yeah, there we go. The site plan. So just to kind of give you a quick overview, we've actually already been approved by. The board is already appeals for a shared parking arrangement for the office. And the brewery. So those, because those activities won't be taken place at the same time. We've worked with the, the ERC and setting the setbacks of the new office building. We've gotten other variances for bumper yards and that kind of thing. But one of the things that's real important to the developers is to make this both a safe and functional destination site. And so one of the things in, in incorporating these two rows is doing is creating kind of a campus feel the, the access there at Phillips and sunset is actually in the railroad right of way. And so we felt like that was real important to actually move that out of the railroad right of way for about a separate driveway access onto sunset. And we've actually had discussions with the OT about all of this. And so while, no, we do not have the full triple report, we have their comments. And all of these are based on, on their comments. And like the fact the driveway location on sunset and closing sunset or closing Phillips, because of its close breaks, I mean to the railroad right away. And they also love the fact that we're taking over Avondale and that is a right in right out. And then they also love the fact that we'll have dated access North on Phillips to Miller, reception Miller in North Maine. That allows patrons to get to a stoplight. And so while we don't have that traffic study and completion, we have had lots of discussions with the OT to try to provide a workable plan, and it works for everybody. So that's kind of in a nutshell open myself up on the developer for questions. And we also have Josh with Lambert architects on the line as well. If you have any questions about the building. So thank you. Many questions from planning commission to the applicant. I had, I got one question. Do any of the parcels along Phillip street access Phillip street now today? So the brewery owns both sides of Phillip street. So they own a triangular piece between Phillips and the railroad. And then they own their main parcel. And so everything else is owned by the brewery. So so we're not, we're not closing off anybody's access on Phillips that isn't owned by the brewery. And Avondale for that matter. Okay. So yeah, maybe I was thinking about Avondale. Avondale is the road on the North end. Yeah, that's right. And the developer purchased two of the logs on Avondale. And so those are being incorporated into the project. And so there are no other parcels that access Avondale as well. So it's all kind of self contained, which is another reason why it made sense to close those runs. Okay. Thank you for that clarification. Sure. Any other questions from planning commission at this point? I guess I'm a little confused about the. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know what, what sounds like a lack of communication, but I mean, in terms of. From my perspective, we. Got this agenda on. Friday or whatever last week. And. You know, it clearly said that. The department was asking for a deferral. So. Don't know what happened there, but. Yeah. Yeah. So the bottom line is that the parking, I mean, the traffic information isn't fully available, though it's partially available, but we don't have any of that information. Is that correct? We sent in a summary of the traffic study and discussions that the traffic engineers had with the DOT. So we felt like we had addressed all of the DOT's concerns and things that would come up. And so, you know, we don't have all the. 100 pages of data that usually accompanies the traffic study. We do have the months and months of the information. Reflected on our plan. You know, with research discussions with DOT. That kind of thing. So that's why we elected to move forward because we did have all that. Kind of in hands of speed, although not. In writing per se. You know, you don't believe the traffic impact study once completed will change anything on your plan as presented today. Not according to my traffic engineer and discussions that we've had with Tyler Clark DOT. They're very much in favor. You know, the biggest issue that they had was actually Phillips. And that intersection and how it sends traffic into. The railroad right away. So, you know, they were excited that was going to go away. And we were pushing a driveway. To be further away from. The railroad right away. And adding that access point so that. Understood. Okay. So I, you know, I guess with all that, you know, we would, we would ask respectfully that we, we do get approval. And I know staff would. Obviously want to review the traffic report. So, you know, I think that's a good point. And sometimes once we get that, and that, you know, obviously that would be okay. You know, we can, we can move forward with any of this without. You know, DOT approval. And here to. What do you want? So. There is kind of a, I guess a backup. So to speak. You know, we can't just go out and do this really nearly. We got to have DOT's buy in them on this. So, you know, I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that's a good point. I think that the traffic engineer did receive the memo. That's referenced. That was sent from the, their traffic engineer. And our traffic in the city's traffic engineer. Felt like. We still needed the traffic impact study. He is in receipt of the memo. Thank you. Any, any additional comments. Thank you. Thank you. We can't hear any more. We'll open it up for public comment. We encourage those who would like. The comment via the web to begin sending in. Emails. C. Oh, see board meeting at Columbia SC. Gov. Or on the web at H. T. Mas colon slash slash. Public input. Dot com. please call 855-APR-2021. For those wanting to leave a voicemail or speak live, please call 855-925-2801. And when prompted, please enter the meeting code 3506. You may then press star two to leave a voicemail or star three to speak live. We do not want to avoid any feedback. We will pause briefly to allow any public input. Chair, I do have one speaker who would like to enter the queue. Okay. Put him through please. This Jim Daniel, can you hear me? Yes, sir, Jim. I'm a real estate broker with top of properties. I do not believe Chris Freeman is on this line. He's the owner of Sox and A couple of concerns. One, let me be sure I heard something right. Did y'all say that there would be 350 people that would be involved in the office building slash brewery that would need parking on site? 350 people? That's, well, not all at one time. This is a healthcare facility that works on tracks. And so that's how many people would be employed. Well, how many people would be there at one time? I mean, you've got a parking lot on Phillips, and then you've got the parking lot that you show on your site plan. And then you've got the brewery that's going to have ongoing operations. I guess one concern from the neighborhood would be where are all these people going to park? Well, we've actually worked out a shared parking arrangement and we've got 180 parking spaces that covers the needs of the facility. So that would be the most cars that would have any one given time would be 180. So what was approved in a shared parking special exception? OK, I wrote a letter to Jordan Stiles with LTC management on March 17, which was the individual that was listed as the contact person for the closing of the road. I also call Mr. Stiles. Mr. Freeman has called Mr. Stiles. We've yet to hear from him as to the plans or answer any questions. For a project that's been underway for two years, this seems to be a considerable lack of communications with the neighbors. Sox and Freeman has a number of large trucks with large pieces of equipment on them that have a very difficult time accessing miller or cook off of Main Street. They typically access Phillip Street as they come down Sunset Boulevard. So their concern is by closing Phillip Street, you've eliminated one of their best ways to get to their operations in the 3,800 block of Miller Avenue. I mean, Phillip Street. And this, I think Greg Minnerton finally got in touch with Mr. Freeman a week ago, but he's been really left out of the loop. And connecting elements also, not connecting elements, there's a warehouse at the corner of Cook and Miller that also utilizes large delivery vans and connecting systems. And they've also raised the same concerns about access to Phillips being eliminated. So we need to address that. My understanding of Mr. Freeman's conversation with Greg Minnerton is that they were going to get back with him. I don't know whether that's happened yet or not. So that's one issue that Sox and Freeman has. And I think one other large warehouse owner has in that vicinity that the elimination of Phillips is going to cause a problem with them. So are you representing the warehouse as well? No, I'm Sox and Freeman right now. But I'm not an attorney. You're speaking as if you are a representative. That's why. Well, Sox and Freeman and the other guys have expressed some interest to me. I'm not necessarily representing them. I've just told them and I've met with them. And they said, well, we may have the same concerns Sox and Freeman has. But right now, I'm not involved with them other than passing on what they told me. Thank you, Mr. Daniel Scott. Let's hear a public comment, please. At the end, you'll have an opportunity to speak again. Please. Any other public comment out there? Emails or phone calls? I have not received any emails at this point. Any other phone calls? And I, likewise, do not have any additional calls. OK. So we've heard some public comment regarding street closures. Does Planning Commission have any additional questions for the applicant? Or would the applicant like to say anything else prior to Planning Commission moving forward? Well, I'm not sure this Planning Commission was about the road closure at that point. I think that was a Department of Transportation issue. I will say there are quite a bit of issues, as I understand with DOT, about where Phillip Street is located now. Because in order to turn right down the street coming down sunset, you would have to slow down and nearly stop on the railroad track in order to make that turn. So it's a pretty dangerous situation. But it would be detrimental to the project, I think, if we have huge, large trucks continuing to flow through that space at fast speeds where we own the property on both sides. I do have a question for the applicant. Have you talked to the businesses that are in the area closing down the streets or in the community? Yeah, we put up notices and asked folks to call. This was the only one that we'd really heard from that was related to that. And from the, we've met with the homeowners associations out in that area and others. And they were very supportive of the project. I would say that building has been sitting and there's lots been sitting in people a long time and they're very anxious to see something different change for that community. Thank you. It sounds like there are some concerns, though, with the traffic, lack of clarity around what's going to happen with the socks and freemen trucks and some other concerns. And that's what we're waiting on is a full traffic report. And I guess that still sounds like it's hanging out there. Any other comments or questions to the applicant? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion. I will move that we defer the item that is listed as number 12 on the Planning Commission agenda. OK, thank you. Got a motion to defer. Any other second or get a second? Got a second. Got a motion and a second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed say no. The ayes have it. The motion is to defer item number 12. We want to do a count of that, Lucinda. I'm just I just want to make sure that's clear in the record. And we can certainly do a roll call, sure. Yeah, I'm just not sure who else on the, you know, I would I just want to make sure that. Gotcha. Yeah, no problem. Mr. Cohn. No. Miss Davis. No. Mr. Hart. Miss Hart. Yes. Miss James. Dr. Mando. Yes. So we're voting on deferral. Correct. And so that was my concern. So yeah, I heard one no before. So yeah. Yeah, that's what I was confused about. So just to be clear, I mean, I hate to do this, but I mean, I think so the vote is I'm saying I voted for deferral. That was a yes. And mind she any is every other person that said no was saying that they did not want to defer. If that's not correct. I mean, I guess I just want to be clear. Sorry. Yes. Thank you for that because I did want to change my vote to a yes for deferral. I apologize, I didn't quite understand that vote. No, I think they got all confused. So listen, I hate to do this, but can you do this one more time and just do a roll call and say a vote for yes is a vote for referral. I mean, deferral. And just make sure we go through it one more time because I got, yeah, thanks. Correct. Okay. So the motion is to defer number 12, the site plan approval. Mr. Kohn. No. Ms. Davis. Ms. Davis. Oh, I said yes. Okay. Mr. Hart. Ms. Hart. Yes. Dr. Mandel. Yes. Ms. Thomas. Yes. Mr. Tupper. Yes. And Mr. Frost. No. We still have a motion that passes with five to two. So the case will be deferred. Thanks, Lucinda. I just wanted to clarify it was hard when- Thank you for pointing that out. I just- There were three nos, wasn't it? Three nos, yeah. Yeah, sorry, five to three. All right. Just trying to make sure it's hard in this format to hear. No, I appreciate the clarification. Absolutely. So we'll move to item number 14. All right. The final item on the agenda is a zoning text amendment. It's to amend section 17283C, table three of the code of ordinances to remove the special exception requirement for placement of wireless communication facilities on existing support structures. This applies in residential districts as well as it was a special exception for certain heights as well that is removed too. So it's just the overall special exception requirement is being removed for those. The small cell wireless, what is it? The small wireless facilities deployment act took effect in September of 2020 and that preempts a great deal of local control over the cell nodes. And it states that such review needs to be at an administrative level instead of at a boards and commissions level. So that's where this change is coming from. Okay. We've heard the case summary from Mrs. Bailey. Any questions to staff regarding this case? Here are none. We'll move to public comment. Again, we encourage those who would like to comment via email or the web to begin sending in letters and emails. Emails should go to COC board meeting at columbiasc.gov or on the web at HTTPS colon slash slash publicinput.com slash C O C P C dash APR 2021. For those wanting to leave a voicemail or speak live, please call 855-925-2801. And when prompted, please enter the meeting code 3506. Then you may press star two to leave a voicemail or press star three to speak live. Please be sure your computer audio is off to avoid any feedback. We will briefly pause to allow any comments to come in via email or voicemail. Any emails or voicemails on this one? Lucinda or Andrew? I have not received any emails on this one. And likewise, I've not received any voicemails. I also do not have any callers that haven't even wanted to speak. Hearing no comments from the public. Are there any additional questions from the planning commission? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I move that item number 14 be accepted as presented. Got a motion to approve item 14. Can I get a second? Second. Got a motion and a second. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. Any opposed, please say no. Sounds like the ayes have it. The motion is approved. Do we have any other business this evening? We do not have any other business that I'm aware of. All right, having no other business, I'll accept the motion that we adjourn. I moved. Got a motion. Can I get a second? I got it. Second, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed, say no. Ayes have it, the meeting is adjourned. Thank you. Have a good night.