 Bad time. Looking at the philosophies, Stoicism is building fortitude against destructive emotions, unfazed and clear thinking at all times. Imperialism, imperialism is your senses shape your reality, external influences, whereas rationalism is looking at the evidence before and reasoning gives you knowledge on how to proceed. There's a fine line between all of those, and I'm pretty sure you could go between all of them. No one is able to be unfazed and clear thinking of all times. No one. Okay. Not even I. Okay. Imperialism is your senses shape your reality, external influences. I think we are all shaped by external forces to a certain degree. Just propaganda being one aspect of it. Okay. And what was it? Using evidence before reasoning gives rationalism, looking at evidence, evidence before and reasoning gives you knowledge on how to proceed. And at times, hopefully, a lot of people are using reasoning and knowledge or research to make decisions. I don't think anyone stays in one state all the time. I think these are about the time and what you're stating is these are things you have to understand or use depending on the circumstances that you're in. Right? Depending on the circumstances that you're in. So for example, if you're in a fight, like a fight, it's a pretty good idea to be to follow Stoicism. Stoicism. Right? Be unfazed and clear thinking at all times. That would be Bruce Lee. Right? If you shape your reality, external influences, if you're at a rave, if you're at a club dancing with other people, then empiricism would be fantastic because you let the music and the energy of the dance of the crowd to influence you, the external forces. Right? If you're doing research into a topic, maybe the most recent pandemic, then it might be a good idea to follow rationalism and use research and knowledge to proceed to the next step. Right? All three you could use within minutes of each other. Really?