 Pomeni, da sem izgleda na personalne noce. Veselim, da se neksos, in iz briljanti šepati, Rob Reimann, Evelin Reimann, Van der Ham, začelim, da se pravamo, da se pravamo, pri toj vrštih forum. Neksos je jedno z najboljših, zeloštih, zeloštih vrštih, v svojih dnev. Zdaj sem zelo vziv, da je to počutno izgleda na vseh stvari, v zelo, da je to vziv, da je to vziv. Počutno na personalne zelo. Na mnogo ljudi sem se počutno v 4.00 v moru. Vsih vseh, da se je vziv, da je to vziv. Zato, kako je na prejvisno vseh, Političnji je zelo vse, da je, nekaj in nekaj, na vsega časna, nekaj in milijne ljudi. V svoju mora, da sem da mora svoje strani v zelo, nekaj starov v tega zelo, še vzelo na svoje političnih, odličenih. Vrstam, kako, zelo v ročne, zelo, kako tače, zelo na moj desk, in izgleda ima mnogo vseh vseh. Ne znam, kako se veliko je vseh, nekako je zelo vseh. Vsem mi prav, kako sem je, kako sem je, kako sem je, kako sem je, kako sem je, kako sem je, kako sem je, kako sem je, da se nekaj možem nekaj nekaj nekaj ne zvedi. Moj države je doživati mnogo po drugega svoječje in prišlično v ključe. Mjelosti je očinjena. Zvom je čiljena. Vajo je čiljena, je počinjena, ali počinjena včaj je odniti očinjena od njavega v ljubi. Now we all know that curiosity is a necessary condition, even the first condition for every intellectual or scientific work. But I want to add that in my view, curiosity is also a moral virtue. A curious person is a slightly better person, better parent, better partner, neighbor, colleague than a person who is not curious. Znamo, da se nekaj prišličen je nekaj prišličen, ali je tako včasno vzvečen, da se vzvečen je taj prišličen. Poziraj, da prišličen je nekaj prišličen, če za hrvom hrvom, je to nekaj pošličen, da je fanačizm. Nezaj sem nezaj zvonil nekaj prišličen, nezaj sem nezaj zvonil nekaj prišličen, Fonatici ne zelo se o tom, da se našli zelo vršči. Vršč je, da je fonaticisno, vrščo je, da se vršči zelo vršči zelo vršči, zelo vršči, in tako, da je tudi vršča, da so vršči vršči. To me zelo vštvo, noženje, odliči, zelo. Še najbolje imet je, ne pripoznete, pripoznete, oč se po vzvečanju političnih kretiča, zelo, neko se počunje, se očalaj o skelitonjih novaliči in pojci, ki bojte skoničiti s filosofa, teologičnih, ideologičnih in profeti. Tako pripoznete je počunje. in to je vidjetko. Vse zelo je vsojevaj, kako je vsojevaj, in nekaj poslutni moralne mesej, in je to začneva, vsojevaj. In kaj je vsojevaj vsezaj delovir, in vzelo je, da na svoj počet izvaj, da vsojevaj vsojevaj vsojevaj vzelo, kaj je. Ga mle Mar'e Noshan Ješrega šel ho ledet. Even an ancient Vista has a moment of birth, as the great Israeli poet Natan Alterman put it. Great literature has entered the shoes and skins of others, strangers, sometimes obnoxious human beings, the donki hots, the jagos, kolnikovz of this world. Bad literature will not open a third eye. It will simply repeat only what we already know and show us only what we have already seen many times. Bad literature in effect fixates the handful of moral and psychological cliches that gossip inflicts on us. Yes, I'm sorry to say. Gossip is literature's poor cousin. Although literature is ashamed of this relative and will not greet it when they meet in the street. Gossip is also a child of curiosity. But gossip loves cliches. It loves reaffirming our prejudices. And it loves reassuring us that everyone is the same. Good literature does just the opposite of gossip. It tells us something we did not know about ourselves and about others. Or something that we did not want to know. Because while gossip remains skin deep, good literature can sometimes accomplish the miracle of delving under the skin. And while gossip intends to flatter us, literature seeks to trouble us. Gossip will say oh, the man is getting old. And mediocre novelist will write all day this is such a sad affair. But Chekov can write about an old doctor bending over a fainted girl taking her pulse rising up and saying these four shuttering words. I have forgotten everything. When I write I do not chiefly address my readers' emotions although I speak to the emotions too. I do not chiefly address my readers' intellects although I speak to the intellect too. First and foremost I address their curiosity. I tell them like a good tour guide would tell his group to notice something fresh in a familiar scenery. To imagine what it would look like if we stood not right where we are now but if we stood on a high mountain above us or down in the basement yard where a woman is hanging her washing. The great Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai wrote once I sat on the steps of the gate of David's Tower I placed my two heavy baskets on my side. A group of tourists was standing around their guide and I became their target market. You see that men with the baskets just right of his head there is an arch from the Roman period just right of his head. But he is moving he is moving, I said to myself redemption will come writes Yehuda Amichai redemption will come only if their guide tells them you see that arch from the Roman period it's not important but next to it left and down a bit there sits a man who bought fruit and vegetables for his family. So please do not ask me to speak this morning as a writer about the two state solution or the one state solution. I have been speaking my mind on this topic for almost half a century but I will say this my support for two separate states one for the Israelis one for the Palestinians does not stem from the historians insight from the politicians cunning or from the political scientists expertise I do not have any of these I only have curiosity and some imagination since my boyhood in Jerusalem I have been asking myself what it would feel like to be a Palestinian refugee or not how would it be to live in a Palestinians skin or harbor a Palestinians Palestinians memories to dream a Palestinian dreams while asking this question I remain an Israeli Jew it did not turn me into a Palestinian or make me adopt every Palestinian narrative and succumb to every Palestinian demand nor has it led me to turn the other chick no but it had inspired me to seek compromise