 I mean, journalism is often called the first draft of history, which means that there can be second and third drafts that are more accurate and looked at in the fullness of time. So how do you try to get the facts out that you know at that time to be as accurate as possible when the political winds are shifting all the time? Right. I mean, one of the things is to be very transparent about how much you really know. And so, you know, you don't want to state, it is absolutely certain that, you know, I don't know, the vice president resigned because of this particular reason. You know, you should say, you know, and document it, two sources said this was the reason. A third source said that they thought it was for another reason. A fourth source said that this, so if you lay it out and you let your reader or your viewer know that you don't have all the information yourself and you're still gathering it, but this is the most plausible explanation that you have found and this is what appears to be happening. And then, of course, if it turns out that you actually printed something that was not right, then you have to be forthright and say, you know, yesterday we reported the reason was, you know, such and such, but it turns out upon further investigation that the reality was more nuanced and this is actually what happened. So, laying it all out allows you to fact check yourself the next day, right? Exactly, exactly. And also, like I said, when I say transparent, that's maybe, I don't hope that's not too colloquial, but that's a journalistic term here in the United States where you are saying this is why we know what we know. And a lot of times in my fact checks, I take the reader along with me on the investigation, let them know where the information comes from, how that information was obtained.