Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Mar 24, 2015
Spending on schools needs to be protected - in real terms - as research shows that spending matters for a child's education, according to ‘School Spending’ by Sandra McNally, the latest in a new CEP #ElectionEconomics series. See http://cep.lse.ac.uk/election2015/.
Objective, brief and non-technical, CEP Election Analysis is a series of background briefings on the policy issues in the May 2015 UK General Election, from the Centre for Economic Performance.
More: The UK continues to perform at about the OECD average in international rankings of pupil achievement with an unchanged performance over the last 10 years. Under the coalition government, half of secondary schools have become academies: schools that are more autonomous and funded directly by central government rather than through local authorities. Research evidence suggests that under Labour, there was a large improvement in the first 100 or so schools to become ‘city academies’ within four years of their conversion. Generalising from these early academies is difficult because the schools that have converted since 2010 have very different characteristics. For example, the early academies were set up in disadvantaged areas whereas the current 4,403 academies have relatively advantaged pupils in schools formerly rated as ‘outstanding’. The schools budget has remained stable as a proportion of GDP since 2010 (6% in 2011), even though the average class size in primary schools is high by OECD standards (25 versus 21). Research evidence indicates that school spending matters for pupil achievement, especially for disadvantaged pupils. The Conservatives and Labour have made explicit commitments on school expenditure over the next Parliament: the Conservatives to protect the schools’ budget in cash terms; Labour to protect it in real terms. But neither has made an explicit commitment to protect expenditure in either the early years or post-16. There is broad agreement that high quality teaching matters hugely for pupil achievement, but the parties differ on where they place emphasis on the curriculum. The Conservatives emphasise basic skills in literacy and numeracy at primary school, whereas Labour’s emphasis is on a broader curriculum in secondary school and the post-16 agenda. David Cameron has promised an expansion of free schools – schools similar to academies except that they are new entrants rather than converters. One of the concerns about this policy is whether or not it will be implemented with a view to meeting the projected demand for places in different areas of the country arising from demographic changes. Professor Sandra McNally, the report’s author, comments:
‘We could do with more debate during the election campaign on the desirability or otherwise of the academies programme.
‘The question is especially pressing for primary schools, which are much smaller and more numerous than secondary schools – and only 10% of which currently have academy status. It would be valuable for voters to know what the different parties plan to do with them and why.
‘The parties also need to be quizzed about whether their commitment to protecting the schools budget extends to the early years and post-16 education. Both phases are very important – and young people now have to be in some form of education up to the age of 18.’