 Well, good morning, all. This is Pat Mellon. I'm, it's, I show 1001 AM. So we will do a roll call and call a meeting to order. Chris Childs here. Brenda Brunner. Present. Liam Logoski. Rosa Ramos. Here, Chef Braun. Here. Eve Hadfield. Chris Herron. Present. Chief Elise Warren. Chief Andrew White. Okay, I show that we do have six members of the already online and that constitutes a quorum. So the first order of business is approval of the minutes from our February 21st meeting. Is there a second? I'm sorry. Who was that? Okay. Thank you, Sheriff. We'll do a roll call vote. Chief Childs. Affirm. Brenda Brunner. Hi. Hi. Liam Logoski. She's shown up. Ron. Rosa's here. Rosa's here. Okay. Thank you. So we have a motion on the, on the floor to approve the minutes from our February 20th. Do you have a vote, ma'am? Hi. Sheriff Brown. Hi. Sheriff Ayoub. Chief Hadfield. Has he joined us? Hi. Chief Elise Warren. Still absent. Chief Andrew White. Also absent. Okay, we'll move on to agenda item number three, which is to the closed session. So we'll leave this meeting and we'll come back. So for those of you that are not on the, the authority. I'm going to go ahead and call roll again. See if the board has been able to rejoin. So Chief Chris Childs. Chief Childs, I see you. Listed, but I don't hear your voice. We'll come back to him in just a minute. Brenda Brunner. I see you. Liam Logoski. I see you. Sheriff Braun. Sheriff Ayoub. Chief Hadfield joined us. Chris Herron. Chief Elise. Chief Andrew White. Still absent. Chief Childs. So you've been able to join us. I see his name, but not his voice. A quorum so we can go ahead and move ahead. So next item on the agenda is a legislative update from Mr. Salvador. You're, you're very, very low in volume. Can you please move closer to your mic? Okay. Yeah, that'll work. The state federal bills. It's still weak, but we can hear you. The state federal bills that are, I played in the sort of two year session, both on the state side as well as the federal side. So, by a Sunday member, which would establish that night in compliance with the existing federal law standards governing the national suicide for best in life. And the bill would require a call out yes. The hotline center or centers provide crisis intervention and services and crisis care coordination to individuals accessing. Additionally, maybe 1, sorry, maybe 1100 by some of the disaster related state of emergency or a local emergency declared by the government require the CPC to collect specified information from telecommunication service providers related to the provider's efforts to repair or replace communications infrastructure that was done. So required that the information collected from telecommunication service providers by the CPC be broken down by each emergency or disaster and be submitted in a report to the CPC, as well as to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislative Senator Don, which would defy a de-energization event as a planned power outage, as specified, would make a de-energization event, one of those conditions constituting a local emergency. And then lastly, on the state site SB 341 by Senator McGuire, we're going to maintain on its internet website a public outage map showing that providers outages and would require OES and consultation with the CPC to adopt by regulation requirements for those maps as specified. The bill would also require OES to provide the CPC with all of the information provided to isolation, outage notification, and to aggregate that data and post that data on the internet. On the federal side, we have HR 1250, which would require the CPC to report on certain activations of DERS or the Disaster Information Reporting System, and to adopt also HR 1848 by Congressman Poloni, that would rebuild and modernize the nation's infrastructure to expand access to broadband and drinking water infrastructure, modernize the electric grid and food supply infrastructure, redevelop brownfields, and strengthen health care infrastructure to protect public health in the environment. That also includes some grant funding for next gen 901. Congressman Smith would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, to award grants to states, territories, political subdivisions, an unarmed 911 response program, and then also Senate Bill 466 by Senator Moran, which again is the Kelsey Smith Act, would require mobile or VoIP providers to disquest. But specifically, the provider must disclose information at the request of an investigative or law enforcement officer. If the officer asserts that the device was used and that the device is in possession of an individual who is in an emergency situation. And then last week, Senate Bill 1175 is the 911Saves Act by Senator Burr, which would categorize public safety telecommunicators as a potential classification system. So we know some of the bills that we'll be tracking through the remainder of the session, and we'll be providing this to you as board members, calling for adjournment of today's meeting. I'll be also Thank you, Mr. Salvador. Is board have any questions of Okay, hearing none, we will move on to item number five, which is a branch report. Alright, thank you, Pat. I appreciate that. So I'm going to go through the normal briefing order here and really want to encourage you to, if you have a question, just let me know. I can see all the board members on my screen. So if you just raise your hand, don't don't with our call stats. Obviously, these are for 2020. They have not changed, you know, the trend here is just an upward tick in wireless calls, which we're continuing to see year after year. It's going up the statistics for quite some time. This is our CP installation. I have a couple of slides later on where we're at with CP. The numbers are low for 2021 because of a couple reasons. We're early in the year. And also we've had some challenges with CP components. And so we've had to put a couple of freezes on the sale of new CP and that's really what's contributing to these low numbers. And I could say I've got a lot more detail on this throughout the presentation. We know that in order to connect a 911 center needs to be, it needs a software upgrade in every single case. And for Motorola, if you have a Motorola system, we're updating those to 7.4 service pack one. And for Viper, we've suspended those sales. There's some testing we're working on. It's valid before we authorize any additional sales of that equipment. And we have had some problems with Viper 7.0 and we're not going to be anybody. We're not moving anyone to that version until we fully tested that in our lab. There are a few, the PSAP gateway. We did a really thorough analysis of this to see the pros and cons of a PSAP gateway. We talked to other states and vendors who have done deployments in other states. And the bottom line is a PSAP gateway introduces the equipment. So our preference is obviously not to install that gateway unless we absolutely have to. So we're working with CallWorks and Central Square and Zetron to see if we can get a solution for them that does not require. If you have very, very old equipment installed prior to 2010 or 2007, really old. There's about 80 out there. That older equipment will probably still need a legacy PSAP gateway. That's the one drawback. We're looking at ways to just upgrade that PSAP to cloud as soon as possible. And I'll talk about that a little bit later on where we are with the cloud-based CPE deployment. What's going to have to happen at every PSAP in addition to the software upgrade? We have to program line appearance and how to use those line appearances. And due to the changes that are coming from next-gen 9-1-1, there are some differences. We've been messaging this at all of our outreach meetings, but we just want to put it out here. I know I've mentioned it before. It has to be completed and there are some changes that are coming. The good news is that the CP vendor is required to support all of your existing interfaces. So this isn't impacting the interfaces. This is just the different look and from one call comes in. And that's part of our training. So a pause here and see if there's any questions on what we're doing with CPE upgrades and how this process is going. If you're wondering how many of these have been completed, I want to say the numbers around 70 PSAPs have had a CPE software upgrade. I think that's the number out of the four, you know, picking progress, but this is not moving as fast as what we would like. Text. Good news with text. We've been talking about this a long time. I would like to say we're fully deployed, but you see that little two there in PSAPs pending. There are two PSAPs in the state that we cannot get around and that's required under the legacy model of this. So we're working on that. It's a physical limitation of at the PSAP. So one is in Sonora, which if you've ever been there, it's not a really large metropolis. And, you know, into the entrance of Yosemite, you'll realize how rural that area is. Once we get those IP connections in, we will bring them online as well. Thankfully, those are very small coverage areas. So the rest of the state, everybody is taking text today on this slide because our next step in the process is to transition everybody off of our existing contract that ends in March, I think it's April of 2022, our existing text contract goes away and we're looking at ways to do that with the limited amount of time we have left in the year and looking at options. We certainly want to maintain the current posture we have where if you have integrated, you stay into rapid deploy who will be the over the top vendor working with autos. If we run into a time crunch where we cannot do the integrated because of CP limitations and testing and everything else, we'll look at alternate scenarios as to stay on this path. But in August, I'll give you a more thorough update of where we are based on timelines and what's realistic to make the transition. So just stay tuned for that. But certainly if you're a web based over the top solution today, you will be transitioning around and keep that but a lot of that could be out of our control might be in the hands of the CP vendor and we've got contracts and legislative mandates we have to comply with so more to follow on that any questions about text. All right, I really want to thank chris for her hard work on this. She has been amazing, and also our, our regional coordinators so you know Ella and Cindy and and getting this project is completion so without chris, we wouldn't have text and 911 so just thank you chris for all your hard work. It's really really been an amazing effort. Yeah, I didn't have a question about the transition from the web base over the top. So, you mentioned that if you currently have that you're going to go to revolution at that point that's going to be compatible with the next gen system, or is it still going to present as a kind of a web based extra screen. That's a great question Brenda thank you yeah it will be on an extra screen just like it is now. The call will be routed through next gen 911, but it'll be displayed on that rapid deploy screen is where the tech so come in. It's not going to be connected any way with the wireless location accuracy. Yeah, it'll be all into that same rapid deployed dashboard single pane of glass will be right in that same tool. Absolutely. Yep. Okay, great question. Okay, so moving on from text. We're going to go through next gen 911. And again we're in this part of the project where we're doing the installs we're trying to integrate our carriers originating service providers. We're doing a test and integration and then we're talking about we've updated the schedule. That's the first thing you're going to see. We were the last time we met we were saying, optimistically, and some, some would claim I was I'm overly optimistic which is probably true. You've heard of people who talk about it because anything in it. So I see things a little differently so my schedules have always been optimistic. So we're seeing that it's going to take us a year to make this transition and and because of everything we're seeing will see be limitations that when we went to go live at our first first piece out from the talk about that in a minute. And what we learned, we realized it's going to be into June of 2022 before we're completed. Now we're still in alignment with what to through our budget change process that we went through. We've got to be finished by the end of 2022. So we, so we still have time on that timeline, but there's reasons why we would like to go as fast as possible as we're not we're not talking so much about dates anymore. It seems like every time I pick a date and put a stand in the ground, the date moves. So there's a lot of contingencies in this project. I'm going to go over those and tell you why we've arrived at where we are on the next couple of time. And I guess to talk about the various contingencies within the project so there's some work that the CP vendor needs to do that's shown in blue. There's some work that the next gen nine one service providers need to do that areas and this the green box on the side here. This is all the preparations we have to make in order to make sure that you're you're ready on the day we migrate the first carrier over so remember that this whole thing is centered on. We make sure you can answer 911 and then we move the carriers over from legacy to next gen. That's, that's the vision and the plan that we're using. So how do we get there. We know that you've asked us, where are we in this process. You know, when is my PSAP going to be online. What's the status of an internal PSAP, PSAP tracking spreadsheet. It's got 80 columns 450 rows, a lot of data in it. And it's too big to share in it and it's, it's information that we really don't want out there for everybody because we've taken that spreadsheet and we've developed an interactive tool that gives the status of your specific PSAP. So I'm going to stop sharing these slides and I'm going to attempt if a demo of what that dashboard looks like. So let me make sure the dashboard is set up properly that right. So can everybody see that screen. Everybody seeing that. Okay, good. Okay, so I'm going to walk you through what this is now this is going to be a public facing dashboard, we want to be completely transparent and where we are in the project data that couldn't be shared publicly. So we've done that. What you see on this side of the screen is a way to filter for your specific PSAP. Okay, so I'll get to that in a second. This here is a subtle scroll down through this information and take a look at all the details about each of the PSAPs that are in here. The information in this pane is those PSAPs and jurisdictions that have submitted GIS data. We have some gauges that show how far we are in the completion process. Right now I don't have a filter on so I'm showing you statewide stats at this point. This validated with the NG91 transfer list, that means that we've validated it next-gen whether it's 10 digit, another PSAP, whatever we validated that and that's in there. The CPE upgrade, that's where CPE line appearances have been done. We've done the programming and we've completed the training for your PSAP. That's that gate. The equipment associated with your region provider has been installed and then you've got ATOS equipment. Now, please don't think that ATOS is going much slower than the region. Remember ATOS can't install until the region does first. So there's always a little lag which is an indicator of how many PSAPs are at that go live moment. In other words, you've integrated CPE with next-gen 911 and they're ready to start taking next-gen 911 calls. And not an indicator that they're live in 911 yet, it just means they're ready. So let me show you what we're looking at. So I'm going to search for Twalamy County Sheriff, if I can type, I will. All right, Twalamy. And then in that transfer cluster, we also know that there are three other PSAPs we're looking at, Sonora PD. So I'll put them in there. There's a cow fire in Merced, which is also referred to as that water. And there's a, I mean, a CHP and Merced. And then there's a cow fire, Stan Andreas. All right, so I have four PSAPs in this little cluster that I'm looking at. And you can see all the gauges update and show those PSAPs. So you as a PSAP, you can go in and look at yours. It's your neighbors. If you want to see how the rest of the set, the gauges update accordingly. We got some feedback from the LRPC yesterday. We're going to add over here on this left pane and explanation of what you're looking at. And a quick little, here's how you use the tool. And we'll have this tool available for all PSAPs next week. So I'll pause there and here. All right, I really want to thank our GIS team. So Natasha is the supervisor in that group and Amanda and Sam and Nicole. They're the ones who did the work that you're seeing here. And we think this is just a really good way to continue to be transparent of where we are with the project. Okay. Because I don't want the hard work to not be acknowledged at the advisory board. We saw this yesterday at the LRPC, not trying to steal Chris's thunder, but you know what's going on and if you're, and we like the transparency and appreciate. Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you, Leanne. I appreciate that. Okay, like I said, we'll send this out. This tool is going to be available and we certainly can make modifications to it and improve it, but we think this is a really good first step. Okay, so I'm going to switch back over to the PowerPoint. If you'll give me a second here and transparency of where we are with the deployment process. So that's, that's a current status of where we are. Now, we learned some more things when we went to go live in Tuolumne. We needed to improve the testing and validation process. So we put a lot with you, we got a lot of good feedback on, hey, we need this training, we need the ability to test this, we need the ability to do this. We need this comfort level before we're ready to go live. And so we hear that. We also realize that each carrier has a very distinct place, but there's certain hoops we've got to go through for each carrier. So we realize that we're going to need your help, the help of the PSAPs out there to support this. And we also know that you as a PSAP probably have some testing that's unique to your needs to check and validate. So we've updated our process to accommodate these. And also, we know that our CPE has some limitations on some of the CPE, the ability to support need I3 and I'm going to talk about those in a second. So what we did was, we started realizing their process and we knew that we could only test so much in the lab. Everything we can, we are testing. But really, carriers are requiring that call to be landed next step. They don't consider the lab environment as checking that box. So, and they give, you know, specific test windows. So what we're asking for is PSAP is able to answer next gen 911 calls, your line appearances are in your CPEs in your integrated the next gen. We want to establish some deliberate test windows at your PSAP. And we had outreach meetings. They said, we'll do as much as we can to test it. We know your CPE technician is going to test it locally, but there's, there's just, we need you as a dispatcher to be able to look at this. And it meets your needs at the PSAP level. So we're asking to establish specific test windows Monday to Wednesday from 10am to 1pm. And we're going to limit the number of calls that are landed during that time and will validate that was sort of a statewide. If you're going to test for next gen, here's your window. We've talked at a PSAP and we have a deliberate process in place. Now, if you get busy, you've got to plan events, you can certainly contact your project manager and tell him, okay, or on the day of something's going, you know, wonky in your area where you're getting an influx of calls and you can't handle any test calls, we understand that to staffing shortages, whatever the reason is, you have the ability to study you had this and then the other thing we're building in is we're going to give your own test number for you to do your testing. So once we're done, you can then validate your own process, you'd simply dial a number and it will ring into your PSAP, so that you can transfer to an A need to do. Those are some things that we're putting in place now that admittedly have impacted the timeline and push things out a little bit, but we know they're important. And so we're making that effort. So I'm going to pause here because that's a lot about see if there's any feedback or questions from the board. I have a question. It's Rosa. Yeah. And so for secondary PSAPs, how do you envision the testing to go? Obviously, like for us when we've had to test text to 911, we have to dial 911 from here and then ask Brenda for us over here. Are we still going to have to, are other primary PSAPs going to take that burden also or that load of testing when secondaries have to also test? That's my question, Rosa. I think, and I'm not going to, everyone's going to be scared on my team right now, but I think we might be able to direct the call straight to a secondary PSAP. Let me ask that, because I think that would be very helpful calls into you and that seems a little clunky to me. So let me ask if we can direct a call straight into a secondary PSAP so you can do your own testing. I think that would be a lot better. I'm glad Andrew is not in the office today because he can't run down here and choke me out from saying that so that's good. Any other feedback because that's really good. Okay. Let's talk a little bit about your CPE. And I want to be careful here because this is not a CPE bashing slide. That's not the intent of this. But there's some realities here that we just need to be and it performs very well in the legacy environment. And that's really what it was designed to test and built toward. And then they put in this I3 capability with the intent of supporting I3 when it came along. Well, we just happened to be the first ones where it's coming along. And so Nina I3. And we're learning that there's some things the CPE just can't do today. Now it's on their road maps. They're working toward development. But as we plan implementation and transition, we have to really accommodate. These are IP version six, which uses the machine address, along with some other attributes to determine routing, which is different than IPv4. And we are also using what's called TLS or Transport Layer Security and a machine address of the devices in the network are given a certificate. And as the packet passes through, that certificate is validated. And it has to be supported in order to deliver those today. Like I said, they're working on it. They're just not quite there. We also need a unique IP address to do something that that's called dereferencing a Nina I3 call. So that real quickly this when a call comes over. So think of it like when you type in www.google.com that Google.com gets resolved to an IP address that travels through the internet to wherever that server is returns back the information you want. Same thing happens here. Read that domain name, dereference it, go get the location, bring the location data in, make a routing decision, send a call to the right PSAP. When it gets to the PSAP, the way it's supposed to work is they're supposed to dereference that same domain and go out and figure out the location. CPE needs a unique IP address. They don't have one. So that they'll tell you, well, hey, we can do this at a PSAP. Yep, they can do it at a PSAP. I need to do it at 450 PSAPs. So I need unique limitation. Other limitations like position state, element state, queue state we've talked about before in this board. These are needed to support some of the dynamic policy routing. We know that those are needed. And those are our future deployment fields, photos, multimedia. Most of those can't be supported by the current CPE that's installed in California. And many of them are also limited in their I3 logging. So we've built in workarounds in the system to accommodate these, but they're really adding significant time on the deployment. That's what all this is working around. So we know the real solution of this is to move through this data center cloud based CPE model that we've developed and get you using those vendors that are on that new Chrome. You know, we have to really deal with this reality. We're recommending that PSAPs wait to replace their CPE if they at all possibly can't. Because if you buy CPE today environment, we don't know how long it will take current versions of CPE to be upgraded to support all this, or even if they ever will. So this is just the reality of what we're dealing with with our cold processing equipment that's out there in CalVirk. We will get it to work. It's just not going to do everything we need it and want it to do until we move to that new contract. So any questions on that? I know that was a lot of technical stuff, but apologize. We want to just really let you know what we're seeing out there. Budge, it's Chris here and I have a question regarding this. So fast forward two years post next gen 911 go live hopefully across the state. And if we do have PSAPs at that point that have CPE that maybe got procured last year or the year before. So in other words, it will at that point be less than five years old. Have you guys started to talk about what that might look like in a transition and earlier transition to the cloud base? Yeah, Chris, that's a great question. We have. And aside from the one time cost to put in the new equipment, the monthly recurring cost in the new model is actually less. So if we can find the budget to make those transitions, if we can't. Obviously, there's certain priorities of folks that have been waiting to buy new CPE. We've got to get them done first. There's others we're seeing some outages and outage trends that we're trying to mitigate. But once we get through those in the process, turn in the machine will probably be able to do 100 a year. So we got those limitations to deal with the yes. If we get through that, we've started to talk about what does it look like for folks who might not yet be at the end of their contract is their way to transition. To add on to that. And I don't know that you have the numbers, but it would be interesting to hear at a future board meeting is how many agencies have postponed the purchase of their CPE waiting for model pricing versus the traditional CPE the new contract versus the old contract. Because if you can only do 100 a year. Obviously, if it's more than 100, which I assume it is, I think we need to be consistent and figuring out, you know, what's best. I know a lot of a lot of the large agencies are going to be a beast to switch over no matter what. So it would be interesting to put those together. I'll have a graphic for you next time on how many PSAPs are in each of those years. So my team is probably scrambling right now. We got to put those numbers together here next time. Absolutely. Okay, so we just want to make sure you understand there's different testing we're doing their CP testing or CP vendors doing there's next gen nine one testing that our vendors are doing to validate the next gen is working. There's go live testing, which is really validating that integration was that done calls are landing on your CP as test calls before you actually go live. And then those carrier testing could have to be done carrier by carrier. Each one may want to validate that they're able to land a call. So we worked to develop a training supplement to support next gen nine one one and Paul has sent that out so all the PSAPs have that because we realize that that there's a lot of training that needs to have any specific questions. Reach out to your next gen project manager reach out to your PSAP advisor and we'll talk through the various scenarios that are out there and concerns because you know with that are at different stages throughout the state. All right. So, when when can you expect to get calls well when the line of answers are there and you've had your training and you and you've seen us deliver next gen nine one test calls the next gen nine one. And then those test windows that we taught your PSAP and every PSAP is going to be on a different schedule and that tracker dashboard that I showed you before will give you an indication as to where you are in that process. And when you can expect to start with. All right, these slides, we're not going to show anymore, because I have to put these slides together about 30 days before I brief the board, and they're always old data about the time before we'll start using that as the the instant in time that that provides this but you can see those of you that are remembering and you saw back where about 74% complete with autos installations, the circuit installations are making their ways through as well. So look in the north, the company there is synergy in the south, the company is Lumen, and then in the central part of the state in LA, those are NGA nine one and you can see we're making progress there as well. There's a lot of moving parts here and I really want to give credit to the project managers that are doing this so Cherise and Kurt and Tiffany and Angela and and really, you know, carrying the brunt of this and they're not even letting me go to meetings anymore. They're like you're done. It's all designed. Let us go figure out how to make it work and implement it so we're at that part in the project which is pretty exciting. Transition schedule stays the same. It's just when we this graphic has not changed. These are names of selective routers. So if you're looking for your PSAP, the PSAP name won't be there. These are the selective routers that exist in the state as we work through our transition. And we're hoping to start in June with that first phase. We want to make sure the procedures in place before we go live. And then we'll continue through the rest of the state and it's all going to be contingent on the success of that first phase because like I said, we want to get this right and there's a lot of eyes on this process. We also want to let you know any switching over to making sure that we deliver a reliable fully capable solution that meets your operational needs. That's our number one focus. And as you go through each phase, it's going to take two, three, four, maybe five months to get through a single phase. And you could be accepting calls like months before we can finish every single carrier transition in your PSAP. And we've tested all those scenarios and everything to make sure that it works. We're also focused on security. I want to make sure that the system is secure. I've talked a little bit about the security already. Everything's running over encrypted IPv6 connections. We're using this public key infrastructure. They call it a zero trust network. If you understand that concept, we're actively monitoring for denial of service and telephone denial of service. Keep in mind, those are very tricky because they're actually 911 calls. The way you do a telephone denial of service is you dial 911 that comes in if it's, you know, a denial of service call or a real call so we have to be careful on how we monitor for that in the network. I hired a company called Netforce to come in and do a third party cybersecurity assessment of the network, identify gaps and recommend cybersecurity enhancements. We also work very closely with our state threat assessment center. And we're participating in all the national groups, whether it's NIST or the Department of Homeland Security, Cyber City Secure. So we're doing everything on our side to to analyze that. Alright, that's really it on Next Gen. Anything you want, any other details you guys need on Next Gen 911 where we are in the deployment questions you have concerns. I just had a quick comment. Just regarding the security, I think it's great that, you know, all the technology that you guys are leveraging and really from the private sector where we've seen a stuff proven incredibly complex project and impacts different people but it's nice to see that technology because I think that is one of the greater challenges especially as we move to cloud-based CPE and, you know, a whole bunch of agencies being on it because it's a much bigger target, you know, for attackers and so forth. Thank you Chief White, I appreciate that. Yeah, that's something that we've really spent a lot of time talking about internally and we haven't, you know, so much discussed it on these calls but we wanted to put it front and center today to make sure that you knew we're tracking this we're in party to help us make sure we didn't overlook anything. As far as the closed session reports on outages, is this something that in the future is the network goes live that you would see reporting on in terms of like when we are getting hit or just to get a sense of kind of We'll be talking about cybersecurity and what we're seeing in terms of cybersecurity. Yeah. Location accuracy project. I'm going to mention a couple of things here. We're using RapidDeploy for this solution and we chose them, you know, a few years ago because we needed an ability to get quickly. I don't want to use rapidly, quickly deploy this tool. It includes SMS text from 911 that's been available for about a year and we've already talked about how we're going to be migrating over the top solution. And you're not using RapidDeploy. We're recommending that in is on May 26 RapidDeploy will also be providing on star data integrated into the tool. So this will show up. There's training sessions. You know, your PSAP has access to that. Leah has some messaging what that on star data is going to do how it will show up the audio portion of that night 911 call will get to your PSAP the way it does today. And then ultimately into the future. We will then be able to route that audio through next gen nine. This is an important part of the strategy for delivering supplemental data to the PSAP and it's the only way we have to get the data to every PSAP. You individually are making choices we realized to get this data maybe in other ways but I guess what you could call emerging technologies and being able to integrate them into the PSAP. So really excited about this on star delivery that's coming next week. So pretty excited about that. This slide's been up for almost a year now. So these are our cloud based vendors. I'm keeping the slide in here in case you want to go back and reference it. You can quickly get to it. And what we're doing now we've met with these vendors and we're we're building out better. We've got another one that's going to be coming in soon to start their testing and we've completed the work in the lab to be able to do the testing and integration with all of our next gen nine one providers they're listed there. So we're ready on our side and now we're in their connections into the lab get that established so we can start building that testing capability for these cloud based solutions. When we get somebody to that point we will let you know we'll let you know who the vendor is where they're at in the testing process and a lot more interested in this in the next few months because you know we're we're ready the PSAPs are ready. It's time to get this stuff that it invalidated in the lab. Next up with us set now our current budget year is going to be ending next month and this fund condition statement will update at that time. This has been the same for about and tell you that based on what we're tracking in terms of revenue coming in expected revenue coming in as a result of this slide which is the surcharge of 30 cents. The revenue is either at or above what we expected them to be within our budget allocation. So the fund is healthy. And we have the resources that we need to accomplish everything that we've been asked to do so really this is just great news around this space for a number of years know that that's not what we were saying, even just a couple of years ago. So thank you for all your support on that. We're being very we're administering the fund in a way that's physically responsible. I'll let you know that internally in my test. He'll be heading up our fiscal unit and we're super excited about him coming in and being able to really keep a handle on this fund and manage this for us so we were really really fortunate that we have the resources we need to accomplish the mission. So with that, Pat, thank you. Are there any questions from any from the board. Or from those that are participating hearing done we will move on to the long range planning committee report from thank you since the last advisory board meeting the LRPC has held two meetings one was in April and then one yesterday. We continue to receive regular updates and provide feedback to the state history board, specifically we did have updates yesterday from all of the next gen 911 regional working groups, as well as the GIS working group. They all met earlier this month, where they were not a good cross section as you recall from from PSAPs across the state small large primary secondary and so they continue to work with a budget his team providing feedback. As was mentioned we saw the next gen deployment dashboard that bud shared with us and we were able to provide some feedback that they're going to implement. And then one thing that wasn't discussed yet but we had a preliminary discussion yesterday with budget and that was the sharing of the statement one branches working on a strategic plan. And so we went over sort of the high level topics that are envisioned being included on that plan so good discussion good back and forth feedback. And that's the end of report, or I'll mention sorry our next we do have scheduled this remainder beer in August. Okay, moving on to agenda item number seven. We have two additional meetings coming up later this year one August 18 and one on November 7 like to be included in with the future agendas had it's not a additional agenda item but it is a question. Do we know if these August and November are going to continue to be allowed to be over virtual, or are they're going to be in person because I know that there's an August that may prevent a quorum if it can't be virtual. Okay, we will converse with council on that. We will confirm with council and and let the board know. It's a good good point. In the other item number eight. Okay, I have a suggestion pat for item seven. I think it might be worthwhile looking at what things we want to change in. Because we have the resourcing. What areas do we want to examine kind of an area for consideration maybe it's premature until the LRPC has a chance to really take a look at it Chris but I think looking at are there any things that we need to go back and look at how our operating manual works and areas that we want to look and it kind of goes to that long range strategy as well but it's as we look forward. What is it that we want to do beyond next year 911. Not that it's not a huge project and what we have but where else do we want to be looking at in the future so what is it that we want to do beyond next year 911. Okay, good point mentioned that kind of goes hand in hand with the strategic. Any other items from the board. Maybe just to clarify on that then to make sure that there is support from the board to. I don't probably not an agenda item for the board necessarily but for the that straightens. That would be a good agenda item to maintain there. Thank you. Any other items or any other comments from the board. Okay, Mr. Medikovich back to the to the stage to provide the statement, Mitch. Hey guys I just want to say thank you to all of you that work that you're doing and work that you've done. I'm extremely proud to have been part of such a great team and a great group and what you do for public safety and to care for the community of California is truly remarkable across the to leave my current position and I don't know which 3.0 is going to look like so you won't see my smiling face for a while. I do not have a successor yet established by the government office but I just want to long term for what you're doing and differences you're making every day. This board has a true impact with it and I applaud all of your efforts and just say thank you to all of you. Thank you very much and you know from the public safety communications and the 911 branches perspective, I can assure your counsel, and you're, you're going to bat for us, you know to get a lot of stuff done the set now. Clearly the set the language do that are going on to support this and the micro and upgrading the microwave network and the radio communication system so, you know from. Thank you very much for your time, your leadership and your dedication to the state of California. Any other comments from the board before we move it on to open. I just want to thank you for your service. I know when I came on the board, you had a lot of information and you kind of gave me quite an overview of what to expect and the expectations. I just want to echo Brenda's comments. You know you are very high up in the leadership level and I always appreciated that you treated everyone with respect and through your leadership a lot has happened for 911 so you know as a director of a piece up I want to express my thanks on behalf of the nine. Okay, any other comments and hearing none and seeing none. As I said the next meeting will be in August on August 18 and we will ability to continue with virtual meeting so great suggestion there Lee and thank you. With that, we'll entertain a motion to adjourn do we have a motion to adjourn. Okay motion by Brenda Brunner do we have a second second chief white. I'm sorry. Who was that chief white thank you sir. Chief what time did I apologize I believe it's 1044 1044. Okay thank you sir. So we have a motion by Ms Brunner a second by chief white. Is there any adjourning none, then this meeting is adjourned. Thank you all.