 So I have 430 now. Does is that correct? It's correct. Okay. Great. Thank you so much. Okay, folks. So with that, I will call to order the October 13th, 2022 meeting of the Centers of Planning Commission. I'm going to read the statement we've been reading now for almost two plus years maybe due to the provision of the governor's executive orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, which has been certain requirements of the Brown Act and the order of the Health Officer of the County of Sonoma de Shelter in place to minimize the spread of COVID-19. The planning commissioners will be conducting today's meeting in a virtual setting using Zoom webinar. Commissioners and staff are participating from remote locations and or are practicing appropriate social distancing. Members of the public may view this item on the city's website as noted on the agenda or via Zoom. Members of the public wishing to speak during item 4, the public comment portion, or during our public hearings tonight, we'll be able to do so by raising their hand and we'll be given the ability to address the commission. With that, if we could do roll call, please. Absolutely. Let's reflect that all commissioners are present with the exception of the commissioner. Ms. Montoya, it's a little garbled. I don't know if it's on my end or. Do I sound a bit better now? No, it's a feedback-ish for lack of a better word. I just wanted to share that with you. Is this a little bit better? Yes, that is. Okay, great. Let the record reflect that all commissioners are present with the exception of commissioner Duggan. Thank you. So with that, we'll go ahead and go to item 2, which is approval of minutes and we have no minutes tonight, so we'll move on to the public comment portion of the meeting. I will now open the public comments for any item not included in this meeting's agenda if you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please select the raised hand button. If you're dialing and via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. You will have three minutes. A countdown timer will appear for the convenience of the speaker and the viewers. Please make sure to unmute yourself when asked to do so and your microphone will be muted at the end of that countdown. So with that, do we have any public comments? I am seeing no hands at this time. Thank you. So with that, I will go ahead and close, excuse me, the public comment portion and move on to planning commissioners report. And with that, I'll once again read the planning commission purpose and that is that we are charged with carrying out the California Planning and Zoning Laws in the city of Santa Rosa. Duties include implementing of plans, ordinances and policies relating to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plans, holding public hearings and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps and undertaking special planning studies as needed. So with that, we'll move on to 4.2, subdivision and waterways advisory committee reports. Are there any? Okay, I'm not seeing any. Commissioners report 4.3. Do we have any reports from my fellow commissioners? Commissioner Carter. I just wanted to report briefly that I did attend the open house for the SR forward general plan update yesterday at the library. And I wanted to accomplish the DEDT that they're all putting together that's the inquiry in its community. Not easy to put a complicated extensive program to sink in other steps, which is great. I didn't make a decision. I've been looking at the station on the 25th, getting on with moving the fire. So, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Any other comments? I would like to mention that yesterday we had the first in-person mayor's board chair lunch since I think probably December of 2019. And so it was nice to see everybody in person. And hopefully that's a sign of things somewhat getting back to normal. So with that, we'll move on to department reports. Thanks. Good afternoon. Can you all hear me fine? Yes. I'm hearing a little derby, so I don't want to add to that. Okay, great. So I was going to go over a few of our upcoming meetings. So as Commissioner Carter referenced in his summary, we do have our joint session with city council that's October 25th. And looks like most everyone has gotten in that they can attend that meeting. We definitely will have a quorum. It starts, it's a study session on the preferred alternative, which is part of our general plan update. I'll talk a little bit more about that and other opportunities for people to participate in that effort. That study session with the city council will start at two o'clock. We're gonna allow it up to a couple of hours to go through that preferred alternative. And so that's an opportunity for you and for the public to stay involved with our general plan update. And then looking forward to our next regular schedule meeting. We currently don't have any items for that. So we are looking at canceling the October 27th commission meeting. But I have an idea. I would like to work with the commission to get together. And I think it's been quite a long time since I think we saw each other in person. In fact, there's commissioners I haven't even met. So with the gift of a meeting opportunity, October 27th, I'm just gonna put out there. I'd like to set up a, could be at the same time a convening of the commission. And certainly to appreciate the work that you put in and to look forward to future endeavors with the planning commission. So I'll follow up with some information about that. But if you do get a cancellation notice, keep us on your calendar and keep alert to your email address because we would like to give an opportunity for the commission to come together in person. Not to conduct business, but to meet and greet. In addition, let's see, we have holidays coming up. So now this is the time of the year we start looking ahead and wondering if we need to rearrange our commission calendar or if we can consolidate items. So as we avoid obviously avoiding holidays and whatnot. And so it happens that our, yeah, the things, obviously we're not gonna meet on Thanksgiving. So we know that we have one regularly scheduled meeting in November. And the second one, which would be Thanksgiving, will obviously not have that. But it turns out that our other one, November 10th, is adjacent to the holiday of November 11th, that's Tuesday. And as a result, part of city services will be, city staff will be off enjoying that holiday in terms of how that works for us. So we are going to need to look for an alternative date for November 10th. We're gonna put out there November 16th, which is a Wednesday. So it may be a challenge, but again, we'll follow up with an email and see if we can find that alternative date to November 10th. And of course, two Thanksgiving and find a different November date. The reason why we're putting forward Wednesday, November 16th is because DRB, Design and View Board, is the previous Thursday. And we know they have items already. So anyway, we'll work through to get to that next meeting about who are looking at a special meeting in November. Let's see, what else? And then December, same situation, likely only to have the first meeting in December and for girl, the second meeting. So just in order to quote on the side with your own calendars, let's just keep in mind and we'll pay attention if we think we'll have enough items that weren't a second meeting in December. Otherwise, we do try to make that work. We usually try to make work one meeting in November and one meeting in December. Okay, so with that, just a special event and a thank you Commissioner Carter for celebrating and announcing and complimenting the event that you went to. I really appreciate that you went to our open house on the preferred alternative. And as you say, that was this last Wednesday from three to seven or Snowden County Central Library. There's another open house opportunity and it was going to take place this Saturday from 10 to two and it's open house format. You can come anytime during the event. It is at the Lighthouse Church at 920 Bennett Valley Road. And again, this is this preferred alternative is essentially a summation of the things that we receive when we're going through the alternatives review. So it's a chance to kind of see your comments into fruition in terms of the big things. So it's a great check, check in to see if we're on the right path and that we listen, we heard you and that's what the purpose of the events are all about. We are going to be presenting English and Spanish and provide childcare through and crisis. So anyway, they're really fun and I hope to see commissioners can attend as well. And but otherwise you can have your joint item to get into the details and that concludes my report. Thank you. Any questions for Ms. Hartman? Okay. So with that, we'll move on to a statement of abstentions number six. Are there any abstentions today? Okay, seeing none. We don't have any consent items. So we'll move right on to our first scheduled item. 8.1, it is a public hearing. Bowden annexation Sequa exempt project, annexation pre-zoning dash 4646 Badger Road, A and X 21 dash 001. It is an ex parte item. So let's start with Commissioner Carter. I have visited the site and have nothing further to disclose. Thank you. Commissioner Cisco. I have nothing to new to disclose. Thanks, Commissioner Holton. I also have nothing to disclose. You, Commissioner Cropkey. I have nothing to disclose. Thanks, Vice Chair Peterson. I also have nothing to disclose. Thank you. And I visited the site and have nothing further to disclose. So with that, Ms. Shikali, you wanna take it away? Sure. Thank you, Chair Weeks. And good afternoon members of the planning commission. I will go over my presentation right now. Okay. So the project was introduced as Bowden annexation. Let me go to the next quick. So I try to start my presentation. Okay. So the project before you today is a presuming of two properties to R16 zoning district. These two properties are located at 46, 46 Badger Road and 999 Middle Rinkon Road. Each parcel currently has one single family dwelling unit with accessory structures and no new developments is being proposed at this time. After all of this presuming would allow these two properties to annex into the city. These two parcels are between the north-eastern quadrant of the city located in a county island. And here is a closer look at these two parcels with the existing dwelling units and some accessory structures. And here is the boundary map of the annexation area. Here outlined in red that shows two parcels purposely resumed. Brush Creek runs between these two properties but it's mislabeled as Rinkon Creek on this map. And on the public notices, I received an email last time from the public on identifying this error that it should be Brush Creek, not Rinkon Creek. And here is a history of this presuming. In 2019, the property at 4646 Badger Road had a septic tank failure that needed to be replaced in order to make the residents habitable. However, the County of Sonoma would not issue this permit to allow the repairs of the septic due to the location of the septic tank system being so close to the creek. As a result of this, the property owner applied for a utility certificate to connect to the city sewer system. In November 2020, the utility certificate application was approved and Sonoma County Local Agency Formation Committee or as you know, we call it LAFCO approved an outside service area agreement with a condition that the owner applies for an annexation. Cynthia also from LAFCO today is available. So if there are any questions about LAFCO and the process for annexation, you can be directed to her. And in June, continuing with the history of the project, in June, 2021, the applicant submitted an application for prezoning and the adjacent property at 999, needle Rinkon Creek also joined this prezoning for annexation. In October, 2021, notice of application was mailed up to neighbors between 600 feet of the project site. Since then, I have received question asking if any developments are being proposed at these two parcels. And I explained no new developments are being proposed and the property owners just want to annex these two parcels into the city. Also 10 days prior to this meeting, two onsite signs were posted and staff noticed the project description is missing from the signs on the site. However, all other notices have included the project description percent to our zoning clerk failure in denouncing shall not affect the ability of a review authority to take action. And about the general plan and zone, being general plan language designation for both lots is low density residential, which allows a density range from two to eight units per acre. And it is primarily intended for single-prime and irresidential uses. And this presuming to R16 would implement the general plan language designation of the parcels. And sequel, the proposed presuming has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. And it qualifies for two exemptions, section 15183 and section 1539 in that the proposed presuming is consistent with the general plan and the project is annexation of existing private structures. And with that, it is recommended by the Planning and Economic Development Department that the Planning Commission, by resolution, recommend the city council approval of the proposed presuming of the properties located at 4646 Badger Road and 999 Middle Lincoln Road to R16 single-prime and irresidential zoning district. The owner for 4646 Badger Avenue is available also if there are any questions. And also I'm available to ask if there's any questions for members and that was my presentation. Thank you. Thank you very much. Are there any questions of Mr. Kali? Okay, I don't see any. And Mr. Kali, does the applicant have a presentation or just if, just, okay, do we have any questions of the applicant before we open the public hearing? Okay, seeing none. Then with that, I'll go ahead and open the public hearing on this item. If you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please select the raised hand button. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. You will have three minutes. A countdown timer will appear for the convenience on your screen. Please make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so and your microphone will be muted at the end of that countdown. So with that, I don't see that we have any hands raised. Is that correct? That is correct. I'm not seeing any hands raised at this time. Okay, so with that, we'll go ahead and close the public hearing and bring it back to the commission. So this item has one resolution. So if someone would like to move that, we can discuss the item. Commissioner Siscoe. I will move a resolution of the planning commission of the city of Santa Rosa, recommending the city council pre-zoning of the properties located at 4646 Badger Road and 999 Middle Rincum Road into the R16 Single Family Residential Zoning District file number ANX21-001 and waive for the reading of the text. Great, thank you. Is there a second? Commissioner Kropke, okay, thank you. So with that, we'll start with Commissioner Carter for comment. Oh yes, from all appearances, Ms. Shikali and the engineering staff, you've done a good job of interpreting this application through this and bringing us an application. I think I can follow the necessary findings to amend the city council for further comment. Thank you. Commissioner Siscoe. I can also make all of the findings. This is just bringing the zoning into alignment with our general plan and for what appears to be a very necessary annexation. Thank you. And Commissioner Holton. I can also make all the necessary findings. This is a pretty simple application well put together and a great job by the engineering team and Ms. Shikali. So thank you. Thank you. And Commissioner Kropke? Yeah, I can make all the required findings. I agree with my fellow commissioners fairly straightforward and needed. Thank you. And Vice Chair Peterson. I can also make all the required findings. Thank you. And I also can make all the required findings on this very necessary annexation. So with that, it was moved by Commissioner Siscoe seconded by Commissioner Kropke. And if we could call for the vote, please. Commissioner Carter. I. Commissioner Siscoe. I. Commissioner Holton. I. Commissioner Kropke. I. Vice Chair Peterson. I. And Chair Weeks. I. So that passes with six I's and one absent with Commissioner Duggan being absent. Thank you, Ms. Shikali. And with that, we'll move on to item 8.2. It's a public hearing, Winkler annexation, Sequa Exempt Project annexation pre-zoning at 1600 Manzanita Avenue, ANX 21-002. And this is Mr. Kondalaria's debut with us. So welcome to you. Thank you. Let me go ahead and share my screen. Mr. Kondalaria is one of our newer planners. Yes. If you didn't figure that out. But thank you all. This is the Winkler annexation for pre-zoning. And go ahead into the next one. Oh, I'm sorry. Excuse me. Oh, yeah. I forgot the ex parte item. So this is an ex parte item. So I need to do that disclosure. So can we start with Commissioner Carter, please? I visited the site and have nothing further to disclose. Thank you. Mr. Siscoe. I have nothing to disclose. Commissioner Holton. I visited the site and I have nothing further to disclose. Commissioner Krepke. I have nothing to disclose. Vice Chair Peterson. I have nothing to disclose. Thank you. And I visited the site and have nothing further to disclose. Now you can take it away. Thank you. So the site is at 1600 Manzanita Avenue. I'm going to go ahead and go into my next slide. So this is a pre-zone for one property for annexation into Santa Rosa. It's at 1600 Manzanita Avenue and it's proposed to go into our R40-SR Rural Residential Scenic Road Combining District. And the action is by resolution recommendation to council. For project history on October 14, 2021, application was submitted for utility certificate submitted due to a failed separate tank and seepage pit. This was to alleviate a documented threat to public health and safety and a registered environmental health specialist determined that the applicant's septic tank was not replaceable or repairable. On December 16, 2021, the pre-zoning application was submitted and on December 30, 2021, the utility certificate was approved with condition from Moscow to annex the parcel into Santa Rosa. On October 3, 2022, the neighborhood was noticed about the planning commission for this project. Here is the project location in regards to the city. It's located on northeastern quadrant of Santa Rosa. And here is another location of where the project site is located. This is the general plan and zoning for the project site. It is currently going to be general plan land use designation as very low residential. And it's currently as County RRV620. It's supposed to be real residential 40.SR, rural residential scenic road combining districts. This is proposed to make it consistent with the general plan and zoning. All properties along Manzanita Road are listed as scenic road and the general plan and zoning code and are designated as SR for the scenic road combining districts. This is the annexation boundary map. This is also attachment four as part of the packet. These are street views for the project site on Manzanita. And this project was reviewed for environmental, it was reviewed for California Environmental Quality Act. It is exempt under seco guidelines section 15183 and 15319 A and B. The presenting is consistent with the general plan and annexation is of existing private structures. There are no issues in public comments were received at this time. The public comments were related to this project. It is recommended by the planning and economic development department that the planning commission by resolution recommend to counsel approval of ANX 21-002 to prezone 1600 Manzanita Avenue to R-40-SR, residential scenic road combining district zoning district. These are, thank you. And these are, this is my information for my phone number and my email and the applicant is also here and available for questions if you have any. Thank you. Thank you very much. Any questions for Mr. Candelaria or the applicant? Okay, seeing none, then we'll go ahead and open the public hearing on this item. If you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please select the raised hand button. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. You will have three minutes. The countdown timer will appear for your convenience. Please make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so and your microphone will be muted at the end of that countdown time. So I do not see anybody with their hands raised. Is that correct? That is correct. There are no hands raised. Okay, so with that, I'll go ahead and close the public hearing on this item and bring it back to the commission if somebody would like to enter this resolution. Mr. Siscoe. Yes, I'll move a resolution of the Planning Commission of the city of Santa Rosa, recommending the city council pre-zoning of the property located at 1600 Manzanita Avenue into the RR40-SR Rural Residential Scenic Road Combining District, Zoning District, file number A and X to 1-002 and wait for the reading of the text. Thank you. Ann, is there a second, please? Commissioner Carter, second. Thank you. So we'll go ahead and start with you, Commissioner Carter. Well, once again, we have a pretty straightforward, necessary application for this. Thank you, Mr. Vandalaria. Looks pretty complete, very fine. Thank you. So, Commissioner Siscoe. Yeah, nice to meet you, Mr. Vandalaria. Thanks for your presentation. And again, this is just pretty straightforward. We need to pre-zone to bring it into alignment with our general plan, again for a necessary annexation. So I can make all of the required findings. Thank you, Commissioner Holton. I can also make all the required findings. Again, cut and dry application. Congrats on your first presentation and looking forward to many more. Have a great day. Thank you. And then we'll move to Commissioner O'Crapki. I can make all the required findings. Thanks, Vice Chair Peterson. Yes, let me add my voice to chorus. Great work. And I can make all the required findings. Thank you. And I also can make all the required findings for this once again, very necessary annexation. So with that, if we could have the vote, please. Yes, Commissioner Carter. Hi. Commissioner Siscoe. Hi. Commissioner Holton. Hi. Commissioner O'Crapki. Hi. Vice Chair Peterson. Hi. And Chair Weeks. Hi. So that passes with six eyes with Commissioner Duggan being absent. And we'll move on to 8.3, which is you again, Mr. Candelaria. So this is 8.3. It's the public hearing. SOGROW LLC Micro Business Secret Exempt Project, Conditional Use Permit, 1626 Piner Road, CUP 21-098. And this is an exparte item. So we'll go ahead and start with Commissioner Carter. I visited the site. Further to? Thank you. Commissioner Siscoe. I have nothing to disclose. Thanks. Commissioner Holton. I visited the site and I have nothing further to say. Thank you. And Vice Chair, or sorry, Commissioner O'Crapki, sorry. No worries. I visited the site and I have nothing further to disclose. And now Vice Chair Peterson. I have nothing to disclose. Thank you. And I also visited the site and have nothing further to disclose. So with that, take it away, please. Thank you. Okay. So this is for a cannabis micro business called SOGROW LLC. And it's at 1626 Piner Road. So they are looking for a conditional use permit to allow a cannabis micro business with cannabis retail, dispensary and delivery, cannabis manufacturing, level one non-volatile, cannabis distribution and cannabis cultivation within an existing 4,130 square foot light industry aisle zone and district building located at 1626 Piner Road. So I've broken down the hours of operation for each use. Cultivation will be 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Distribution will be Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Manufacturing will be Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Retail with dispensary are Sunday to Thursday, 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. And Friday and Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. The cannabis retail, the dispensary will be open to the public while the other uses will not be open to the public. I also listed the size per use. So cultivation is 1,293 square feet. Distribution is 1,289 square feet. Manufacturing is 463 square feet. And retail with dispensary is 567 square feet. So here is the location for 1626 Piner Road. And here is the general plan and zoning for the site. The cannabis micro-business uses are listed as allowable by the BICUP and the Isle Light Industry Zoning District. For the project history, on December 15, 2021, the application was submitted. On January 5th, 2022, there was a notice of incomplete application sent to the applicant. On February 9th, 2022, there was a neighborhood meeting held. No one from the public attended the neighborhood meeting, but the meeting was properly noticed for zoning code requirements. September 1st, 2022, application was deemed complete. And October 3rd, 2022, Planning Commission public hearing was noticed. Here is the site plan for the location. And here is the floor plan for the location. The uses are spread out throughout this location. Here is the cannabis retail buffer map. Cannabis uses are subject to a 600-foot minimum setback to a school, which is defined by the Health and Safety Code. In addition, the cannabis retail use shall not be established within 600 feet of any other cannabis retail use established within and permitted by the city of Santa Rosa. The yellow triangle on this project side is where the project is. And it is outside both the blue buffers for the schools and the green buffer for other cannabis uses. These are other general operating requirements. So listed are the odor mitigation plan, the security protocols and procedures, and the transportation loss delivery area will be inside of the building to facilitate secure transport of material to and from the business. And the project is subject to building and fire permits as described in the building and fire code requirements for cannabis-related occupancies. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and staff has determined that the project qualifies for class one categorical exemption under secret guidelines section 15301, class three categorical exemption under secret guidelines section 15303, and class 32 categorical exemption under secret section 15332. The Planning and Economic Development Department recommends that the planning commission by resolution improve a conditional use permit to allow cannabis maker business with cannabis retail, this one through in delivery, cannabis manufacturing level one non-volatile cannabis distribution, cannabis cultivation within an existing 4,130 square foot light industry aisle zoned industrial building, located at 1626 Piner Road. If you have any questions, my information is listed here and the applicant is present if they, if you have any questions, but will not be presenting. Thank you. Thank you very much. So with that, are there any questions of either the applicant or Mr. Candeloria? Commissioner Carter. Yeah, Candeloria presentation, with hours of various fun under the project. Mr. Carter, we're having a hard time hearing you. I don't know if you can get a little closer. The hours of operation are described differently in two locations in the application materials. I'm wondering if you can clarify that for me. Yes, what are you, sorry, let me share this again. Yes, what are you referring to? Yeah, on your slide, it has 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. in the, the project, or the project narrative, I guess provided by the applicant, it says 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. seven days a week. Mm-hmm. Can you clarify that for us? For which piece? Manufacturing? Sorry, you're muted again. Sorry. Mr. Carter, you're muted. I just need to understand, 8 to 5 days, 7 days a week, refers to in the other project description in the application materials. Oh. I would need to double check. I'm not sure why they're different. Okay, I would actually like to refer to the applicant. Could I have them present? Thank you. Could we have the applicant? I see a hand raised for Elora Babini. Elora, you should have permissions, allowing you to unmute. Sure, so my name is Elora Babini. I'm with Wayfinder LLC. I am here to represent the applicant. The applicant, Mr. Schaefer, is also present. If he would like to speak to that question, he is more than able as well. I wasn't sure if he had the ability to talk on here as well. Yes, he also has permissions to unmute. Okay. I'm here as well. This is Asa Schaefer. Thank you all. I'm just trying to understand where it was represented from the 8 to 5, because I missed that part. I'm looking at the screen that shows me the dates and times that are current. I believe Commissioner Carter was referring to the project narrative. Is that correct? That's correct. It's an attachment to the staff report. The project narrative paged for hours of operation, seven days a week, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. And so this is Elora Babini with Wayfinder. I think I can clarify that. I think this was corrected, and that's what's in the slide here, is that the hours of operation have been corrected from the original narrative submitted to show the actual hours of the 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., when the initial hours had gone in. It had been so, when staff are present, there are times outside of that 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., where they may arrive earlier to set up, make sure that everything is available to the public for the hours of operation, which is the 11 to 7, Sunday to Thursday, and they'll land in 9 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. Does that answer your question, Commissioner Carter? Ours for the digression. No, not at all, not at all. We want to be consistent. Okay. Thank you. So any other questions before I go ahead and open the public hearing? Okay, so with that, I will go ahead and open the public hearing. If you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please raise your hand. If you're dialing in via telephone, please dial star 9 to raise your hand. You will have three minutes. You see the countdown timer there, and please make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so by the host, and your microphone will be muted at the end of that countdown time. Okay, and I have seen no hands at this time. Okay, thank you. So with that, I will go ahead and close the public hearing on this item and bring it back to the commission. If somebody would like to enter this resolution, and then we can have discussion. Thank you, Commissioner Siskum. Come on a roll tonight. Yay. Yay. I'll move a resolution of the Planning Commission and the City of Santa Rosa, making findings and determinations and approving a conditional use permit for a 4,130-square-foot cannabis micro-business use within an existing building located at 1-626 Piner Road, APN 015-05... I'm sorry, 015-053-051, file number CUP21-098, and wait for the reading of the text. Thank you, and Commissioner Krebsky, second. Thank you. So with that, comments, we'll start with Commissioner Carter. Other than the verification of the finding of the operation, don't see anything out of the ordinary condition, and I can make the necessary findings to support the recommendation. Thank you, Commissioner Siskum. Yes, I can make the required findings and have no issues with this application. That seems like a good spot for it, and a complete application. So I'm in favor of it. Thanks, Commissioner Holton. I can also make all the required findings for the conditional use permit. We'll put together, thanks. Thank you, Commissioner Krebsky. I can make all the required findings in order to support the application, thanks. And Vice Chair Peterson. I can also make all the required findings to support the resolution. And I also can make the required findings to support the resolution. It was the application was concise, and as Commissioner Siskum said, I think it's a good location for it. So with that, it was moved by Commissioner Siskum, seconded by Commissioner Krebsky, and if we could have the vote, please. Yes. Commissioner Carter. Aye. Commissioner Siskum. Aye. Commissioner Holton. Aye. Commissioner O'Crapkey. Aye. Vice Chair Peterson. Aye. And Chair Weeks. Aye. So that passes with six ayes when absent, Commissioner Duggan being absent, and I do wanna note that this action is final, unless an appeal is filed within 10 calendar days of today's action, the time limit will extend to the following business day if the last day falls on a day that the city is closed. For information on how to submit an appeal form, please contact the project planner. And with that, unless we have anything else, Ms. Hartman or Ms. Jones, we will go ahead and adjourn the meeting. Thank you all, have a good evening. Thanks, everyone.