 So the following paper presents results, specifics, and problems which we are dealing with during research in Bogic woodland in northern part of Poland. Area of woodland which we are interested in belongs to the cooperative city and is located in the middle northern part of Polish Baltic coast, research area, covers approximately 1,400 hectares. So this is cooperative city and that's the place, the area of research and that's mostly the place where all the sites that will be analyzed are located. The area was formed by Vistulian glacier, the entire forest is not heavily modified by then, mostly because terrain was closed until 1990s, early 1990s when the Soviet air base in Bogic was closed and abandoned by Russian troops and then the area was reopened to the public. It is dominated by oak and beech trees, however intensive forestry is carried out at present. The oldest oak tree within the area is named Bolesław and it is about 800 years old. The whole area is part of the Nature 2000 project. The beginning of the research of the area is connected with the discovery of big part of cementsry in 2016 on airman laser scanning digital terrain model Derigate. So basically this is the cementsry we're talking about and it was discovered by coincidence. I was searching through the data, looking at the former Soviet base for buildings which were related to the storage of nuclear warheads and then I noticed that place and I said, ask Marta if she can check it out and she discovered that this is actually something meaningful though. So this is also the question when the archaeological discovery is made, when we notice something or when we actually learn what it is and see and can narrative its value. I believe this is the second case when we actually learn something about the place then we make a discovery not through basic notice of something that is quite unusual and should not be there. So due to geographical division of poem, the cementsry is located on the border of two measure regions, Slovenian coast and the older plane, approximately two and a half kilometers from the Baltic seashore. Sea is located on a slope of moraine upland at the height of 16 to 18 meters above sea level. And now something about the data we use. Information about special plan of the site came from analysis of ALS, DTM, the rigor. The data was taken from ESO's governmental program. Our density of process point was about four points per square meter. Archaeological site was scanned on 5th of April, 2012 and it had a positive influence on the quality of collected data because in this period of vegetation was not intensive and light up penetration was quite high. The point that was reclassified for the purpose of identification of archaeological relics created DTM has various of sites, half meter by half meter. Based on obtained DTM, several derivatives were created and some of them you can see here and that kind of visualization was then interpreted in GIS environment. The obtained data was vectorized to generate special plan of the cementure and to determine the approximate number of the mounds present in the area. Additionally the results of interpretations were verified during field reconnaissance, field walking to recognize chronology of the site. The decision was made about limited excavation or excavations of one of the barrels. Analysis of field walking, analysis and field walking verification led to the conclusion that all together about 57 mounds of varying size are present at site. Diameter of well preserved mounds ranges from 7 to 25 meters and barrel on eastern side of the road seems to be better preserved and their height varies from 0.4 to 1.5 meters. So as you can see the road cut the cementure later on I will be talking about that as well. Unfortunately part of the site was seriously damaged as these 10 mounds were destroyed by construction of the road by German Wehrmacht during their retreat from the air base in baggage at the end of Second World War. In most cases barrels were cut in half by the road whereas no information about any finds which may appear during construction works but we have to remember that it was last month of the war so nobody really cared about archaeology and think as the site war. Other destruction were caused by heavy vehicles and over old cars. Because of very wet terrain car was deeply penetrated the ground this situation led to a serious damage of the structure. Also activity of wild animals like foxes, badgers has an impact on their state of preservation not worth it is the destruction activity of detectors who happen to looking for some treasures there as well. The central part of the mound that was designated for ecological excavation was destroyed which most certainly was a result of mechanical removal of a tree growing on the barrel stove. Traces of this action are quite well visible on the LiDARB deliveries. It was also confirmed by terrain profiles based on DPM where in matter of the mound was quite well visible with an exception in the northwestern part. During excavation we noticed that barrel adheres to a small mound which was not being visible at the beginning of the research. So basically you got barrel here which was excavated. This is the place of destruction from removal of the tree that was growing on the top of it and that's the place where the small mound was located due to excavations. Actually you can see that it is visible at the derivative but at the beginning during the analysis of this derivative we did not notice it. So again the question when the discovery is actually made and we have this feature in the data because we did not notice it and those are of course terrain profiles with the destruction visible in the middle. And those are some pictures from excavations just to let you know how the site looks like. In the forest. And during excavations it was discovered that we are dealing with a barrel site of Gilbarc culture. Of course it shouldn't be there according to the current knowledge. So if you look at this map, this is the place where this barrel site is located and before that it was empty spot that nobody told that Gilbarc site can be located within this area. It was perceived as empty space until now. During our excavations in the woodland it turns out that many people knew about the site. It just happened that nobody ever reported it. For various reasons, maybe mainly because they did not know how to report it and to whom. It appears that both forest and local residents have some knowledge about the archeological sites in the area. We have started getting emails with information about sites not necessarily in the woods but we noticed that something was changing and people really wanted to cooperate with us. Thus we formalized the project. Main purpose of our project is not invasive archeological research of the forest area between villages of Kondelnos, Tramnicka and Bagic near Kowoczek as well as surveys of the coastal area near the former Bagic area. And those are following project stages. So archival queries and analysis of urban laser scanning data some pathological and biochemical analysis, palinology analysis from the context surrounding the sites, field verification of the sites of field walking, some limited excavations, geophysical surveys and in the end popularization of the results of the research. An important part of our project is cooperation with local environments such as museums, history enthusiasts, forest management and metal detectors. Without them conducting of our research would be impossible or at least very difficult. The forest ranger has the knowledge of what to take into account during field walks. The local explorers and metal detectorists are very helpful during surveys due to their experience with metal detecting equipment. At the same time this cooperation led to grow a mutual trust and those shows the need for presenting the results in less scientific and more popular form. It is also important because the destruction of the mumps goes on. We finished first stage of field surveys recently. We already took samples for palinology on the forested area, we noticed five new sites as well. We also started biochemical analysis of the grays from baggage. And the new site, new baro site was also located. It was registered to be the interpretation of LiDAR data and actually it's located in the area of Moran Hills with height of site nine to six meters above sea level with a distance of 20 baros on site, the diameter of which is in the range of five to seven meters and the average height does not exceed one meter. The barrier mumps are quite well preserved. They do not bear traces of destruction as a result of forest management or illegal penetration by the factories. So it appears that the site was unknown to anybody, even the local residents. And we have no idea of the chronology of those baros, but we will return the distance of 800 meters from the backend site, the site I was looking at the beginning about. Objects were registered that looked like another barrier mumps and have to be verified, so those are such places. But we are not sure yet if those are actually baros of something related to the forest management. Reset of the young forest area resulted in discovery of few fragments of pottery and the roots from the younger period of Roman Iron Age. We also found medieval art, probably, and probably the probable remains of graveyard of Pomeranian cultures that's probably one of the graves. Okay. In addition, during the research in the woods, we were able to register the object which could be interpreted as neolithic rondel near the forest. This unusual discovery was confirmed by our political material recognized during salvage. As you can see here, we've got vertical aerial photography and I believe it was taken from Google Earth and we can see here positive crop marks which marked the place where the backsuit ditch was placed. And that's the field where the site is located. We put your attention to the popular aspect of our research, so we are preparing website, we are going to schools, forestry and local museums with lectures. In October, we will be filming our research at the end of our project. We will present our research in a popular publication. In our case, the W.S. Ford is the popularization of archeology. We try not to keep our research secret or to talk about it as much as possible. Therefore, we encountered various surprises such as occasional destruction of burial mounds. Some other problems are related to the specifics of the salvage itself. Of course, salvage can only be carried out in the area of young forests. In other cases, we can try only to find artifacts in dens or pits, so we often do not have the possibility to state the chronological sites. Despite many inconveniences, at the first stage of the research, we were able to register many archeological sites in connection with this, and the studies conducted by us covered the empty spots on the map that was the forest of baggage so far. The results are so interesting that they have a real influence on what we know about the archeology of Northern Poland. Already, we have noticed two sites, which should not be there, according to the current knowledge. Therefore, we have nothing else able to re-enter the forest to continue our work. Thank you very much for your attention.