 Let's start this out with an example of what the helper chain is going to have to be. Grab it by the function. Yeah. In order to understand it. So which is how lovely it was. And now I can no longer get to my bookers. If you disappear on us, please just come sit down and let's just sit. Alright. Thanks for sitting down. Thanks for not eloping. So let's go over the video of ethics here. I'm going to redo kind of all of the things that were the non-exemplars so far. I mean, the ones recorded in a bar. Yeah. Let's take a look. So they hired me to do this curriculum. This Carl's Corporation Correction Curriculum thing. That I haven't even seen it. I don't know anything about it. They wanted to deliver the thing. So, and Stephen came to me and said, hey, can you pull this off? I'm like, of course I could pull it off. What the hell are you thinking? I know exactly everything. So I went online. I didn't find anything. I mean, they've got a website and they sell it, but no research. No, nothing. I think there may have been an ethical violation. I've been told. Anyway, so I think what we have here is an ethical violation, right? I kind of missed it. It was witches heads that anyway. So what is it? Code 1.02 from the BACB, I believe. Oh, I'm sorry. No, no, no, my bad. 1.01. So code 1.01 from the BACB, which is the reliance on scientific knowledge, I think. This is tricky. I haven't really memorized these things, but reliance on scientific knowledge. There we go. So reliance on scientific knowledge. So Stephen or Carl's Corporate Curriculum Correction, whatever. Clearly has absolutely no evidence to it. It's something that's put together on the internet. And these things are out there. They exist. There's all sorts of different programs out there that don't have any sort of evidence for them. I mean, it's possible that Psychor has one or two. But the point being is rather that you shouldn't be using them. They're not okay. We need to use things that have evidence, right? So we have to be able to use programs that have been shown to be effective. Well, there's a little bit of a catch-22. How do you show them to be effective without the evidence? And probably, you know, you got to do the experiments to find out. You got to do the research to find out. But in this particular example, the Carl's Corporate Correction Curriculum or whatever it is has clearly no evidence, which is why we said that. That there was none there. All right. Let's go ahead and get back to this one. All right. Here we go. I didn't even look at the curriculum. I just kind of pulled it out of my bum. And I was like, I know what I could pull up. I know I can do this. We can just do the baseline assessment from here on out. So that's all I got to do is do that initial assessment. And then guess what? I do believe I violated another one. And this time, I am absolutely confident that it's 1.02, boundaries of competence. So boundaries of professional competence, whatever. Anyway, the point being that I, in this example, I don't have the skills, right? So I'm talking about my ability to generalize based on my other experience, but I don't actually have the skills and the training of implementing this particular curriculum. Not even really sure in this example if I even have the skills to do the OBM type work in general, because I'm literally saying, well, we're just going to grab a baseline and move on, right? So the boundary of competence issue here is, and this is kind of a sticky one because it is a touchy point in the field. And if you dig deep enough, you'll see that. But people have to get trained, right? So I should have had some sort of supervision. I should have been working with some other master behavior analyst that helped me implement these curriculums and gave me feedback and shaped me in the delivery of the OBM type work in order to ethically deliver this weird curriculum that we'd made up. So assuming that the curriculum was ethical in and to itself, which it's not because of 1.01, but you already saw that one. So anyway, that's really what this one was about. To make sure, folks, that you have training before you branch out into a new area, get the training or work along the way with somebody that already has the experience so you can be trained properly. And now that we're done with all that, let's just go back to the video. We can just do the baseline assessment from here on out. So that's all I got to do. And then guess what? I could get paid 500 bucks a day. Isn't that crazy? Can't believe you've got 104. 201. Look at these things. All right, folks. So there's a couple of more ethical violations here, as you might imagine. So the first thing is 104, right? So integrity. So integrity is a bit of an issue in this particular one. So actually, we're right there, right? So integrity. So 104 is the integrity and the idea being that clearly all of this is lacking integrity. It's really hard to kind of pinpoint which particular piece. But I'm not being truthful. I'm not being honest. Everything that I'm telling my client, everything that I'm telling you in this video is basically a blatant lie. So the other one, 201, right? So we're accepting clients. I'm accepting clients I probably shouldn't accept because I don't have any particular experience. And I'm not going over any details with them about my experience. So we do have a bit of a problem there. So they're not making informed decisions. These videos are so much fun to make because they're just so wrong. It's easy to kind of apply all of these, right? So then we got another one, 206, Maintaining Confidentiality. Really? There's a bar. If you look closely on the bar, there's data sitting there on the sheet. There's people all around me. Now, I don't actually know these people. This is not a confidential environment. I'm talking about an actual client. I'm talking about real people. It's happened to be my brother, but whatever. We're not violent. I don't... Yeah, anyway, it's a... Yeah. So that's what else we got. 201. So avoiding false, deceptive statements, right? So sort of public comments. I'm lying about all of it. I'm lying about my experience. I'm lying about what's going on. I'm lying about my ability to handle the things. I'm just basically just creating a whole bunch of crap about that, right? So it's all becoming a mess. I'm trying to think what else we got. Oh, 805. Testimonials. Now, I don't have somebody else doing a testimonial, but I'm kind of doing my own, right? I'm bragging about what I can do, what I can't do. And that's totally against the ethical code, right? So we're not supposed to be doing that. I know that sometimes people want to do those sorts of things, but it's just genuinely unethical. We let our work speak for itself. We don't have to get other people bragging about it. We don't have to do that. We just talk about our experience. We talk about the data. So when we're in that 101 sort of environment with the client. So I think that concludes the first part of the ethical violations here, and hopefully you're going to stick around and come back for another video or five on...