 I want you to recognize that we need to hear from the court commissioner something you've been anticipating all the week long. Yes, you put limiting and firm together in the same sectors and it's probably better. If you don't feel this is the most exciting time dealing energy issues, you need to do a little mental reset. Because right now we are at a time where there's so much happening, it's so complicated, it's so exciting, and everyone in this room can make a difference in terms of making it better. I come from the state of Washington and we've known for a long time as having leading policies on energy efficiency. We've probably heard it a dozen times today of that. The energy we save is the cheapest energy there is. We put in place a building code back in 1990 that's saying an unbelievable amount of energy in the last 21 years because in fact the buildings go in place, they stay there for a long time and efficiency just plain makes sense. But now along with some of my colleagues on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and we have a primary role in the wholesale electric market in this country and some of the policies relate to the infrastructure development. And the markets are the key to my opinion to getting the new technologies out, things that we see today, things that haven't even been imagined yet. We need to make sure that customers have the opportunity to make choices and in the end to incorporate a lot of the new ideas in the technology at an individual level. If they're given that opportunity, they'll make the kind of choices that truly can transform our society and our energy consumption. But we're doing a number of things that are important in trying to make this happen, not only to focus on developing regional electricity markets, but also making sure that the policies are in place. As God mentioned, to get the electric input rate and the whole power system develops it in a way that can handle more exchange of power and less congestion and higher rates of reliability. These are the kind of investments that are very capital intensive but ultimately are not a big part of the customer's bill in the end and yet a lack of investment there can cost a lot more on the energy side. So one of our major priorities is trying to develop the grid, build it up, create the right financial incentives for these investments. These are home-throwing investments that can't be outsourced. They're good like high paying jobs and we need to focus on making sure that that grid is built up. In the meantime, there are other things to the market level that can help facilitate some of the newer technologies. Now honestly, we have some challenges with generating generation and incorporating it into the grid. Those are not insurmountable challenges, but they are real. There are a number of ways we're trying to deal with that. Not only expanding the markets themselves, but also something my colleague, Christian Norris, who talked about the work enabling storage devices to be better compensated on the grid. Storage is not the ultimate solution to a lot of our challenges We can effectively store electricity other than in water and high dams. We can incorporate new technologies, allow intermittent generation to be better fed on the grid, and ultimately make it more efficient and more reliable, collective grid that benefits consumers in many ways. So again, I will leave you with a message that, in my opinion, focusing on important mechanisms and allowing important entry of new technologies is something that I strongly advocate for and I think you should be cognizant of. It's an exciting time to review these issues, thank you for your interest in all of them, and I hope that you will go away even more inspired tomorrow than you were today to review these issues. Scott.