 And this is a very special moment for Acre. The state of Acre has always been in a hurry, because the population can't wait for the ideal conditions of an international negotiation, of a national debate on the issue of the network. It's kind of this laboratory for innovative policy. As a poor state, we need to be more creative. The BR 364 road passes through the Brazilian state of Acre to the border with Peru. In this part of the Amazon, the tropical jungle is still predominant. Acre still has 87% of its forest coverage, but the lack of part of the road in 2010 implies that this area is now at risk of a greater deforestation. Therefore, the government of Acre has identified this area of the road as a focus for the initiatives aimed at deforestation. The government would not like to make other places that we have found in the form of development be repeated, such as the expansion of the pecuary in an unordinary way, the expansion of the burned areas, the problems we have found to make the producers generate income and at the same time guarantee survival, food sovereignty. Small producers like Sebastián Lima da Silva receive the assistance of the state to adopt more sustainable practices. They were encouraged to develop the agriculture and the agriculture. They were given plantations from Açaí to enrich their forests with the precious fruit state and they were taught agricultural techniques that reduce the need for fire use. And if the teacher had never appeared here, what would the Lord be doing? It was at the same time. At the same time. It was burning. Because we had no other alternative to live. We had to fix the environment and make it at least for consumption. We had to do it by hand, we had to do it by iron, we had to do it by hand, we had to do it by rice, and if we didn't burn it, we wouldn't have a living. Even paying a lot of money, but we wouldn't have a living, we wouldn't have anything to eat. Then everything is getting better. What is happening along this road is just a part of a much wider and more energetic scheme. The state system of incentives to environmental services, CISA, became law in 2010. ACNE has a really special history that I think when you look at the innovation of the state system for incentives for environmental services, it really is the culmination of nearly 15 years of policies that were focused on forest-based rural development. We are trying to move to another model of development based in forest. The CISA scheme has the objective of reducing deforestation and improving the means of life of the inhabitants. On the other hand, the ACRE state hopes to receive funding from governments or private investors that would buy carbon credits generated in the forest of ACRE. As other tropical forests, the Amazon is of great importance worldwide, especially when it comes to climate change. The conversion of forest-based forests or deforestation because of the heat or the cold releases carbon to the atmosphere and accelerates global warming. To help solve this situation, we have proposed a scheme called RETMAS, supported by the United Nations, with which it would compensate for tropical countries for reducing the emissions derived from deforestation in the forest. Despite the fact that there are great hopes for RETMAS, international negotiations advance slowly. However, ACRE continued on its own. We cannot wait for everything is in agreement and we cannot wait for everything is regulated at the international level to have our own initiative because the world needs action not in the future. But also we don't call the carbon program as a RET program of ACRE because we're trying to avoid the traditional concept of RET trying to put other benefits together in the process of emission reductions. It's also an important reframing of RET because it is more palatable to people who are actually on the ground and people who need and want development. It's just development in a different way. The ACRE general prosecutor, Rodrigo Neves, participated in the establishment of the CISA legal framework. Today, even without a national system, we were able to develop a consistent system that we understand because it has permanent institutions. This obviously creates a low incentive so that the union moves and in international negotiations takes into consideration what we're doing here. And now we understand that the state is already mature to take the second step and really enter the regulated market and make the first public offers of credit. My surprise was that at least there are in the world some countries that want to believe that something is possible and that want to help initiatives like ACRE in order to continue moving forward in these initiatives. Because if we don't have this kind of flux of money to enter in those initiatives, we can't finish with the motivation for the governments because we wait and wait for something that never comes. But in the rivers, and what happens in international and international negotiations ACRE has demonstrated that the sub-national action is possible. A host of alternatives. We are here. So as a lawyer the chance to do something that transcends the work itself and the existence itself the benefit not only of the people who are here, but of humanity makes what we try to do much more than what we would normally do at work.