 to a number of other areas of science. There was, when I first started in anatomy, it was sort of the peak when there was some really outstanding anatomists working. And anatomy was utilized by surgeons and surgeons in training used to come back and teach anatomy. So that they would be up to snuff with anatomy. But about that time, the electron microscope came in and people who went into anatomy only do electron microscopy, not the sec commanders. And then that's been now followed by molecular biology. And I'm sure if you talk to department heads, they would say that their first priority today is not anatomy, but molecular biology. That's where the money is. That's what's going to keep it all going. And so the only people who do gross anatomy are people who usually are not interested in gross anatomy. There's nothing in it for them in the usual sense. If you're in molecular biology, you have to get a Nobel Prize. You know that if you're working in anatomy, you're not going to get a Nobel Prize. That's where that goes. So what is happening is courses are still being given. The courses are getting shorter and shorter as a consequence people are not interested in going into anatomy and it means that information is being lost. As the textbooks go from this size down to this size, from two and a half inches to one inch, you know something is being lost. And so frequently the part that's lost is the anatomic variations. And we see lawson's all the time where a surgeon or whatever didn't know about the variations. He never was ever taught or made aware of them and makes a big mistake. I think where anatomy is going, all is not lost, at least for those who care about anatomy. The radiologists have a need they want to know and they need to know and they're legally liable if they don't know. So I think the natural evolution of this is going to be towards radiology. And anatomy departments as such will probably disappear and go into departments of molecular biology. The last time I was in an anatomy department and they wanted to change the name of the department from an anatomy department of anatomy to something else. Everybody wanted to change the department of sub-biology and only in pointing out that if we take anatomy out of the department of sub-biology, there's no reason to have a whole department, all of us sitting there, to have the dean get rid of a whole bunch. I mean there's no, you're not doing anything that the college needs or thinks it needs or wants or has to do. So it was a department of sub-biology and anatomy. I think there is a shift and that's a good one because when you need to know and you want to know, it's going to be healthy and survive. It's only when you don't care that it goes from bad to worse. And I think that's what's happening in the anatomy today.