 They're not worried about Russian influence. They're worried about dissent. Being labeled a Russian propagandist all day every day for criticizing US foreign policy is really weird. But one advantage it comes with is a useful perspective on what people have really been talking about all these years when they warn of the dangers of Russian propaganda. I know I'm not a Russian propagandist. I'm not paid by Russia. I have no connections to Russia, and until I started this political commentary gig in 2016 I thought very little about Russia. My opinions about the Western Empire sometimes turn up on Russian media because I let anyone use my work who wants to, but that was always something they did on their own without my submitting it to them and without any payment or solicitation of any kind. I'm literally just some random Westerner sharing opinions on the internet. Those opinions just happened to disagree with the US Empire and its stories about itself and its behavior. Yet for years I've watched people pointing at me as an example of what Russian propaganda looks like. This has helped inform my understanding of all the panic about Russian influence that's been circulating these last six years, and has given me some insight into how seriously it should be taken. That's one reason why I wasn't surprised by Matt Tybee's reporting on the Twitter file's revelations about Hamilton 68, an information op run by DC swamp monsters and backed by imperialist think tanks, which generated hundreds if not thousands of completely bogus mainstream news reports about online Russian influence over the years. Hamilton 68 reported to track Russian attempts to influence Western thought on social media, but Twitter eventually figured out that the Russians the operation has been tracking were actually mostly real, mostly American accounts who just happened to say things that didn't perfectly align with Beltway foreign policy. These accounts were often right-leaning, but also included people like consortium news editor Joe Lauria, who's about as far from a rightist as you can get. They played a massive role in fanning the flames of public hysteria about online Russian influence, but while they did this by pretending to track the behavior of Russian influence ops, in reality they were tracking dissent. One of the craziest things happening in the world today is the way Westerners are being brainwashed by Western propaganda into panicking about Russian propaganda, something that has no meaningful existence in the West. Before RT was shut down, it was drawing a whopping 0.04% of the UK's total TV audience. The much-touted Russian election interference campaign on Facebook was mostly unrelated to the election and affected approximately one out of every 23,000 pieces of content, according to Facebook. Research by New York University's Center for Social Media and Politics into Russian Trolling Behavior on Twitter in the lead-up to the 2016 US presidential election has found no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to Russian foreign policy campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior. A study by the University of Adelaide found that despite all the warnings of Russian bots and trolls following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the overwhelming majority of inauthentic behavior on Twitter during that time was anti-Russian in nature. Russia exerts essentially zero influence over what Westerners think, yet we're all meant to freak out about Russian propaganda while Western oligarchs and government agencies continually hammer our minds with propaganda designed to manufacture our consent for this status quo, which benefits them. All this and we're still seeing calls for more narrative management from the Western Empire, like the recent American Purpose article The Long War of Ideas being promoted by people like Bill Kristol, which calls for a resurrection of CIA culture war tactics like those used during the last Cold War. Every day there's some new liberal politicians sermonizing about the need to do more to fight Russian influence and protect American minds from disinformation, even as we are shown over and over again that what they really want is to shut down dissident voices. That's what we're seeing in the continual efforts to increase online censorship in the bogus new fact-checking industry, and calls to increase the output of formal U.S. government propaganda operations like Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty, and Radio Free Asia, in the way all dissent about Russia has been forcefully purged from the Western media in recent years. In the way Empire-amplified trolling operations have been shouting down and drowning out critics of U.S. foreign policy online, in the way censorship via algorithm has emerged as one of the major methods of restricting dissident speech. They claim there needs to be a massive escalation in propaganda, censorship, and online psy-ops in order to fight Russian influence, while the only influence operations we're being subjected to in any meaningful way are only ever of the Western variety. They just want to do more of that. Our rulers aren't actually worried about Russian influence. They're worried about dissent. They're worried the public won't consent to the great power competition they plan to subject us to for the foreseeable future unless they can exert massive influence over our minds because they know that otherwise we will recognize that our interests are directly harmed by the economic warfare, exploding military spending, and nuclear brinkmanship which necessarily accompanies that campaign to reign in Russia and stop the rise of China. They're propagandizing us about the threat of foreign propaganda in order to justify propagandizing us more. We're being manipulated into consenting to agendas that no healthy person would ever consent to without copious amounts of manipulation.