 Okay, and I'm going to talk a little bit about the next iteration of our maps, which in this AppCentric world we're calling version 3.0. I don't know what the point 0 stands for, but anyway, it's there. So first we're starting with different alternative measures of physical hazards. So we have some new data on water anomalies, on too much water, abundance, or too little water, scarcity of water. We are using updated subnational conflict data. So our partners at Oclid, Arm Conflict, location and events data set are now, I think, one week to 10 days behind. So it's always almost real time. So we're including those. We're also working very hard to improve our subnational database of household resilience, household and community resilience. And we're doing that on a couple of different fronts. One, we're trying to standardize our subnational units across indicators. So rather than having just rasters that we have to overlay and use GIS to analyze, we can analyze with more statistical analysis. So we'll have a common unit of analysis, a common geographic unit of analysis. And this is done using a combination of shapefiles from global administrative database, global administrative unit layers, and map library. So combining those, which using the ones we think are most accurate. We also have more and improved subnational indicators that we've extracted from subnational household surveys, predominantly USAID sponsored demographic and health surveys. So now instead of just a couple of indicators that are at the subnational level in that basket, we have many more. And in fact, most of them now, education, literacy rates, infant mortality, and now nutrition are all at the subnational level. We're also trying to switch from using just quintiles, which is just 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, to a much more fine grained percent ranks. So we have, so down to, you know, 100 degrees of difference rather than just 5. This allows for much more detailed analysis and much better analysis on the impacts of what happens when you play with one policy, when you try to improve health indicators in one country. What does that do to the overall vulnerability? So this is just one indication of the infant mortality rates. It's a little bit hard to see, but you can see that in the first iteration there were much less granularity at the national level. Many of those infant mortality rates are just using national level indicators. Now when we're moving to the more subnational units, we now, instead of 55, 54, 55 countries, we have approximately 800 different subnational units. So we get a much more finer grained picture on that. We don't yet have these maps ready to show. So now I'm going to move to jump ahead a little bit, move away from the vulnerability project into what we're calling this year's project on urban resilience and climate change challenges in Africa. So this is every year, this is the fourth year of the project, and every year we've conducted what we call a policy research project at the LBJ school, and this is where we have a team of master students that are looking into a particular problem. So Jennifer's going to talk in a minute about what she did last year, but for this coming year we're working on this project led by Professor Bob Wilson and myself as the deputy director. In this, we're thinking about cities in Africa as places that perhaps need more look at the institutional capacity of cities to deal with climate change. Africa is the least urbanized continent, but that is rapidly changing, as probably most people in this room already know. And Africa's cities already face a wide variety of challenges, among them high levels of poverty, strained education systems, overwhelmed public health systems, lack of adequate housing, public infrastructure that just can't keep pace with growth. So adding to all of these problems is climate change. And this is something that policy makers at the city level will need to take account of when they're dealing with these other challenges. The World Bank has estimated that up to 80% of the expected 80 to 100 billion dollars for adaptation will be in urban areas. And yet, I don't think that 80% of the attention is going to urban areas. Some cities are trying to deal with this in spite of a lack of national level attention or international consensus to deal with the problems that cities will face. Some cities are already dealing with it. In Africa, Durban is probably a shining example of that. Many, however, are not, and for a variety of reasons that we're going to try to get to over the next year, competing priorities. I mean, if you can't deal with the problems of today, why should you worry about climate change in the future? Is it a lack of policies? Is it a lack of developed policies? Or is it a lack of failure to implement those policies? Is it a lack of financial resources? Or is it a lack of human capacity? And I mean, I can go continue to list political will. Or are politicians accountable to their populations? Looking at horizontal cooperation amongst municipalities or vertical cooperation between the municipality and the national level. What's happening there? So these are some of the things that we're trying to get to with these questions. What are the challenges? What are the policies or plans that have been developed to face those challenges? And what are the obstacles to implementing those policies? I'll be happy to talk with anybody about these questions or give you a copy of the perspective. We're really looking for input on these. We think that our contributions can be the institutional focus. We're not engineers. We're at a school of public policy. But from an academic perspective, we can look at these free from political constraints that the UN or the World Bank might have. And we're hoping to look at this across cities. It's a comparative analysis so that we can compare if one city is doing something well versus another city that might not be doing it well. Across climate hazards, why does one climate get better responses than another climate in the same city? So these are our cities. We've chosen them for variation in the climate hazards, the geographic region, economic development, and the colonial legacy. So of the nine master students, 18 master students will be going to nine of these cities. And then I'm working on one of these case studies. So anyone who has any expertise in these cities, please see me offline. And with that, I'm going to hand this over to Jennifer.