 So, the opening of the debate, you said that the criteria for which side should win should be based on individual flourishing. But it kind of got left out of the debate. It was brought up that within the world of jobs, the world of capitalism from the get-go, our only thing that we can choose is to work or to starve, is to do something within the horizon that capitalism provides us where we make money rather than something of true creativity per se, and then I could also bring up how, you know, technology only, okay, question, question, movies being remade, etc. The question was how is that not coercion, where my only ability is to work? It is, I mean it's funny, it's funny that we live in such a, I guess, a wealthy society that you think that you should just deserve to do whatever the hell you want, and other people should work hard to pay for you. I mean, so you want to tax people who work so that you can do your hobbies? No, you want to do your hobby, work, and then do your hobby, but you have to earn your own survival. You are not born, guaranteed anything, you have to earn it, you have to make it. So that is not coercion, that is a metaphysical fact of life that as human beings, we have to go out there and produce, make something, do something in order to, in order to feed ourselves. So in, in older times, you had to go out and work in the fields. Now you have the privilege, the amazing ability to have a choice between jobs and a choice between- So using the super chat, and I noticed yesterday when I appealed for support for the show, many of you stepped forward and actually supported the show for the first time. So I'll do it again, maybe we'll get some more today. If you like what you're hearing, if you appreciate what I'm doing, then I appreciate your support. Those of you who don't yet support the show, please take this opportunity, go to uranbrookshow.com slash support or go to subscribestar.com uranbrookshow and make a kind of a monthly contribution to keep this going. I'm not sure when the next-