 No. So we have the latest, the latest version of the, do we have a latest version here? Yes. It should have 2.1. Okay. 2.1. And I've got a copy that here is the, it's changed substantially since the last couple of times we've talked about it. All reference to admission options. Yes. But other than that, I thought it was pretty, and then we got the quotes better. Well, it also puts the focus on Vermont's long time leadership and opposing spread of nuclear weapons, which I think is something that people in this building will relate to as well as people outside the building, obviously. Yeah. But I think reminding them that the General Assembly voted for nuclear, abolition of nuclear weapons is a good reminder for people to have with them. I think that we've made it more appealing to the Senate while keeping it on target pollution, use that phrase. Well, while keeping it with the spirit that the citizens wanted it to be when they originally proposed it. Right. Yes, it consists with our resolution of many years ago. In 1999. So this is sort of, you know, it's 20 years later. This is the update. Well, part of the problem is talking to somebody about it. We also closed Vermont Yankee, obviously, part of it, because we were concerned about the effects of nuclear power. But we've got it so used to us as Americans living in a constant state of war, like all this bad stuff going on around us so much that I think that we've forgotten about it. We have not thought enough about nuclear weapons in a long time, I think. Right. This is a good reminder. Wake up, call that. This threat has not come away. In fact, it's coming. You could argue we're closer than ever. And yes, in fact, it's going to be insidiously embedded unless we do something and stand up and say no. Right. So a procedural question. We will vote it out today. We'll bring it up. It'll be in the calendar tomorrow. Right. I don't know that the resolutions do the same thing. They go unnoticed. OK. So they'll go unnoticed tomorrow. And tomorrow is tomorrow Thursday. So Friday, it'll be voted on. I don't know. We generally don't read resolutions. Right. Steve just read the resolution. Yes. But that was very special. We hardly ever read resolutions. Right. So the question is, given the fact that a lot of people have committed to vote for it, do we really want to read it? And do we want to encourage not having a roll call vote? I would ask my two questions. I think those are good questions. I would prefer to have it read. It's not that long. And I would prefer to not have a roll call vote. I thought, I could be wrong, obviously, but I thought that since it was treated as a bill, treated like a bill sent to committee, that we were presented like a bill on the floor. Oh, interesting. That's just my assumption that they treated as a bill sent to committee. That's because there's any policy, or even if there isn't a policy, and if they don't want to put it right on that calendar that they treated as a bill. So I think we have to ask John Bloomer. We should. So let's chat, because actually it would be wonderful if you presented it, or either one of you presented it, it would be, I would think that would be great, better than it being read, quite frankly. Sure. It will be distributed to everybody's desks, because it's so different, obviously, from what was initially presented, introduced. So I think it would be much better if we explained it briefly inside of it being read. Right. Well, if I would, so check with Bloomer, and if it's treated like a bill, then there would be a report on it, and the reference to the committee vote. And however you want to do that. And I would ask that you present it. You've been more involved in it, and you were one of the original sponsors, I was not. It's true, you were not. We're glad you've come along. And I did have that. Okay. And out of difference, I can speak with, well, I don't know who might be on either side. I can speak with people that might be on the side I'm going to find myself on, not to request a roll call. That's why I would not request a roll call. I've been asking people when they either say yes or no. Oh, please don't. Okay. Right. And I won't ask them. Yeah. Yeah. Can I go find Chris? Do we know where Chris is? He's in a conference. Oh, I know. I didn't hear that. Yeah. So, but we can keep it open. Yeah. For him, because we know he's, he was a reluctant maybe at the beginning as it was I. And I think the both of us have come around. Okay. And I have to say I've come around because of all the work that's been done on it. I would not have come around to the original resolution. Well, I think two things were, as I watched, I mean, because I was in early. But I think what impacted us all was the hearing. The committee hearing was very powerful, I thought. And I thought that was great. And I'm really grateful that you pushed forward on that, Jeanette. Thank you. Yeah. I think we'd be in a whole different place if it wasn't for the hearing. Yeah. Pretty powerful. Yeah. It was powerful. And wow. So, is there a, I'd make a motion that we move, that we vote out SR5 as amended. What would that do? We amend SR5 with draft 2.1. That's the first thing. And so, Bray is not here. Clarkson, yes. Call, Callmour? Polina? Yes. White? Yes. Okay. And the second motion is to pass out SR5 as amended. And Bray is still missing. Clarkson is a yes. Callmour is no. Polina? Yes. White? Yes. Great. Thanks. And I'll get Chris on those two votes. Good. Good work. Thank you. Thank you. Well, and to move forward, not just to stick with it, but to move forward, because that was the big decision.