 You know I don't know if you ever read And I I hesitate to bring it up, but I don't know if you ever read Nathaniel Brandon's kind of autobiography but it's He very much had this premise that he had to be John Gault had to live to that he could he wasn't and he couldn't be so he faked it for years and years and he was good fake and he was brilliant at it and The worst kind I mean he was a real He really deceived the world he deceived himself and it all collapsed all at once and when you read his when you read his autobiography He is the villain in his own own autobiography. It's quite clear what he's doing and what he's doing it so that's a that sounds like an interesting read and It was a painful read because yeah, I found it very painful primarily because you know He's doing this to my heroin, you know, he's doing this man. So It's hard to stomach. Yeah, but yes, I think it is for psychologists. I think it would be really interesting Yeah, but I think that's a real Not reduct you. I mean, it's an actual real-life example of imposter syndrome Gone mad because that's the extreme case scenario of what can happen If you remain on the premise that you're supposed to be that, you know flawless infallible model right rather than that it's actually perfectly normal and fine and good To be confused and to struggle and to have uncertainty and to not even be able to fathom being a jungle yet or you know Or ever concretely but not not being sure what your version of jungle would even look like But you know genuinely striving to figure it out at whatever level you're already at Yeah, no, I think that's that is so crucial. It's so important particularly for objectivists because they have this this ideal All right, here's a here's a question