 John asks, how is chat GPT going to be integrated into Microsoft 365? Of course, we've all seen the announcements out with Bing, and even Satya Nadella, so CEO of Microsoft has talked about how it's going to be integrated into all of the Office productivity tools. So you think about Word, PowerPoint, and Excel, and everything else. This is the big question. I know we're going to speculate a bit, but what are your thoughts on how this will be integrated? I'm using it today for some of my own personal productivity. For example, if I wanted to create a session abstract, I would have to write it. I'm not very good at writing these things admittedly, but I'll have a blog post and I want to talk about it at a conference or an event. So I'm asking, excuse me, chat GPT to make me an engaging session abstract based on my blog post, and it gives me this starting point that I wouldn't ever be able to write myself without spending hours on and trying to write in that style that I'm not capable of. So I take it, I edit it, and I make it mine with a personal touch, and I can say things like rephrase this to be more interesting. In simpler terms. Yeah, more interesting. Whatever the case. More interesting than the person who's going to actually be talking. So my hope is when I use something like editor inside of Microsoft Word, I can just do that brain dump of information that is maybe not coherent, maybe not as eloquent as I would like it to be for whatever reason, and ask it to generate it in a way that is more consumable by users. Like we all think different ways. We all write in different ways. And that helps me be more productive. It also helps some audiences be more included in the content that I'm trying to create. I guess I'm hinting at it's almost like an accessibility tool for some. Like I struggle to write it because maybe I have a learning deficiency or just a different way of thinking of things. So I can get it out with help, and I can optimize my time on it. So that's my hope. My first thought was like the PowerPoint, the design tools, and one of the problems with technical content, and we've all been guilty of doing this, where there are eye charts, there's just too much content on a single slide. I can foresee this as taking that complex content on a slide, and breaking it down into multiple slide suggestions or just on a single slide down to like three bullets. So taking paragraphs of information. So it's conveying or messaging as part of the presentation, and then moving the detailed content into the notes, for example. I think that would be a fantastic tool, or even then based on the content, making suggestions for AI-generated or licensed content out there that's going to be the most relevant and give you different design options. So I think that could be incredibly powerful. It's interesting when I hear both of you guys saying, because I think of it from a search perspective mostly, I think people really struggle with knowing how to phrase things and how to look for things. So by bringing that human communication element, it helps them. Yeah. That's an extension of the grammar capability that the tools already have. Natural language processing, yeah. Yeah. Right. I think it really helps define. Because sometimes I think we think things and we know what we want, but we're not entirely sure how to ask for it. So by asking for it with using natural language, then I think on the back end, it's able to find things easier. I'm not having to create boolean phrases to find things. I'm simply writing a sentence. I want to know what so and so did at such and such a thing, and can you give me information about it? It's a lot easier than writing a this and this, quote, quote, this and which is not how our brains think. So I think from an accessibility perspective, I think it's great. I think it becomes accessibility to everybody, as that's extended into the world of us interacting with applications. Because that's ultimately what's happening. We're interacting with applications, which for some reason has always been fairly easy for me. It's like I think in the way that the search tool needs me to think, whereas I don't think that's the normal way that people think. So I think when you think about interacting with these applications and to Christian's point, I want something that's going to design something that's going to tell them how I feel about it. It's hard to put that into words. Well, if you can put it into words, and then the application knows what you mean. Now all of a sudden, you're working together in a better way. I just think we're helping our future tech overlords understand us. Well, have you guys gotten to experience the new designer, Microsoft designer? So I got a license for that last week, and I started playing with it. So if you put, I want to make this, and then you can even get into the image. I want to have a fairy by a tree in the moonlight with a river. It'll draw five renderings, it'll give you five renderings of those images all together and I've been playing with it for the last couple of weeks, and it's just so cool. I got a license for that, I just haven't used it yet. Hey, if anybody wants an invite, I might have one or two. So just let me know, I'll get it your way. It is interesting stuff, and it's an enabler if used right. It will help you get content out quicker. So what I just saw was share and go. Yeah, the Chinese code up. Then norm to your comment, my wife always tells me that I'm an enabler, but maybe that's a different thing. Yeah, it's a different angle. I asked chat GBT to write a blog post for me. I didn't use it, I just wanted to see if it could do it. It was like the first time I had used it, and it put out this really great blog post about how our Automate and SharePoint work so well together, and how these scenarios and use cases, and I was like, this is really good. So I took it, put it into Word Online, because you have the editor can search the web for like content, and it found all of the different website articles and posts that the AI generated blog post was based on, and then Word Online created a bunch of references for it. So it was like this whole coherent articulate article based on things like learn.microsoft.com, people's blog post, third-party apps, and I was like, in some ways, it's just grabbing content and patching it in for you, but when you get it to rephrase your own content, it's very powerful. That's cool. That's where I think in the EDU education sector, there's tools that are being built to do like the plagiarism checks. Of course, there is metadata that's associated with anything created by the AI as well. So there will be other kind of flags for admins, for teachers to be able to go and check around those things. But to your point, as I was playing around with trying to find out, I had pulled some text from an article, and the article was outdated. So this is in one note. So I was testing really old content of what I knew was a broken link, and it went and found the reference, the citation that was updated. Now, of course, I could have gone and searched and found that, but to be able to, if I've got that already within an article, for it to go and find similar content, for asking for what are sources, similar sources to the point that I'm making and find other references. You still need to go as the human factor and look at those, say, okay, this is truly what I want to cite within my work, but there are ways to embellish or bolster your content and the position that you're trying to take, and more easily find similar voices and content out there so that you can properly cite those things. I mean, there's just a lot of great... So I've started using, to your point, Norm, it's my content, but it's really rough. I'm like, I put in the rough draft. I'm like, here's the, I get the idea. I call it like the stream of consciousness blogging, where I'm just getting the ideas out. I'm not wordsmithing it. I'm just trying to get, what am I trying to say? What do I want to cover here? And I'm taking that and saying, rephrase this. And if you look at the paragraph, sentence one, awesome, sentence two, fantastic. Sentence three, that doesn't really make any sense or it's duplicate, whatever, around that. So it's still, it's my content, but I'm having it just add some improved grammar and structure and it gives me ideas to go and things. So somebody wants to find it. It's like, it's not replacing the human interaction, but it is speeding up. It's unblocking you from the writing, the creation process, giving you other ideas based on your inputs to create other things. And so that's what I'm excited about. And I think we're going to see a lot more like that inside. And then there's the one other thing that I, that was through using, it wasn't chat GPT, but using Jasper AI, I did the trial for the artwork creation. And so I do a bunch of standard posts, like I do my music posts every Saturday and I went and created just a generic image and I said, hey, create this image and it generates three or four samples. So I do, I title all of my music posts blue plate special. So I have a picture of blue plates and I want them to be different every time. And it generated a bunch of blue plate images which I was able to go and use that were original AI. I don't have to license them from another site. I've used, gone through all the free unsplash.com images. So that kind of stuff is cool. The only thing I will say is that when you create with humans and the images, sometimes they could be kind of creepy. Like they've got too many teeth. No teeth at all. Just hands with six fingers. That's a great note to end on. Yeah.