 Now, let's talk about Mac Jones. Jones is someone who's more of the traditional pocket passer in this group, but his stock is rising as well. Do you think he belongs in this group of quarterbacks? I would say that I believe Mac Jones can be efficient in a good system because we saw that in college. That's the way that I'll phrase that, being very careful with the phrase in there. The problem is that there are a lot of red flags in the statistical profile for Mac Jones. He's an older, inexperienced quarterback and that's a very risky archetype because since 2000, 16 quarterbacks have gone in the first round coming off their age 22 season or older with fewer than 35 games of experience and Jones, just 19 games of experience. He's like a full year short of that cutoff, but those 16 quarterbacks have accumulated just two top 10 seasons and total net expected points across 69 qualified seasons. That's not very nice. And those came from Carson Wentz and Ryan Tannehill. Those guys are much more athletic than Mac Jones is. Same thing for Joe Burrow, who often gets brought up when Jones is discussed. They're both older, less experienced, but Burrow, a lot of athleticism there and a lot of production via his legs. So to me, Jones has some similar red flags to Duane Haskins coming out, both were one year starters in very good systems, who got a lot of production via screens and yards after the catch. Haskins, I would say could have been a good quarterback in the right system. So Jones definitely could produce if he wanted to go into the right team. But the notion that he is a high floor prospect to me is something that is disputed by that day.