 I've been asked a lot this week, particularly by Chinese members of the press, is the economic relationship still a primary source of stability in the U.S.-China relationship? And it should be. We have a very robust economic relationship, highly interdependent by design. We have an enormous trading relationship. China is, I guess, our third largest export market. You know, it's certainly one of our largest trading partners. And by and large, when you break down what we produce and sell and what they produce and sell, there's a lot of complementarity. That said, this is Washington, D.C., and the basic economic logic doesn't always apply. And there are serious challenges in that relationship. This is in a time when jobs equals trade equals China. This is a very difficult time for President Hu to come to the United States, particularly when the Chinese public and many of the Chinese leadership are not particularly interested in, quote, doing something, and, quote, for the Americans on trade and economic. That's rather a challenge. The issues are pretty straightforward. You've got the President has defensive issues primarily on currency and the impact of currency on U.S. jobs. But also, you know, suggestions that other parts of the Chinese economy are subsidized and, therefore, directly compete unfairly with U.S. production. And you've got some market access issues, tremendous market access issues for a business community that has carried China's political water here in Washington for most of the past 20 years. So when the business community begins to become unhappy or begins to find a competitive environment in China that much more difficult, it seems less and less likely and inclined to want to do something for the Chinese here in Washington. So pretty difficult. Now, what are the administration has been hoping against hope that there would be a shift in the valuation, the remnant B, in the positive way, more than the simple numbers to date for this year or since the announcement of revaluation or re-application of flexibility was made earlier this year? There's a bit of hair pulling going on in Beijing from the contingent not only at the embassy but the heavy USG contingent that went over to China earlier this week. There's a concern about what can we do on the market access issues, particularly as there are other things that we can do on the indigenous innovation challenges that our companies have, some of the intellectual property rights issues and others, although I think the administration in China will largely point back to the results of the Joint Commission in Commerce and Trade that took place in December and say, well, here's what we got those things accomplished. And then there's been a lot of hope, particularly from some larger companies that President Hu's visit would be accompanied by significant commercial transactions and that really hasn't panned out to date and it looks with just a few days left for the visit that it's going to be very difficult to put in place a very significant order that the administration can point to and say, look, see, China equals trade equals jobs in a good way. So it's a fairly challenging environment for the President and President Hu to come into and I'm not sure that at this point that one can say that the economic relationship is a primary source of stability. In fact, one might argue that it's shifted into the frictions in that relationship have begun to define the relationship in a fairly negative way. Again, not always appropriately, but that's certainly the suggestion. President Hu, I know, will try to showcase the beginning of what everybody outside the Beltway hopes is a wave of Chinese investment into this country and I think there are some suggestions that there may be hope in that direction, but I'm not sure that some of the messaging there is going to be effective enough to overcome a lot of the negativity surrounding currency and some of the market access questions. So with that, I'll stop there. Bring them back over to questions. Karen. Like you, I think I've been assuming that the new makeup in Congress makes action, whether it's legislation or other activity in Congress on currency that much less likely and the Chinese certainly have made that calculation and believe that they've all taken, breathed a big sigh of relief that, well, we've got some good old pro-business Republicans in the house now and that's going to carry us and make sure that our water continues to be carried. I just spent the last weekend at a new members retreat and I think the Chinese have made a serious calculation and I think my assumptions about the likelihood of currency legislation having been reduced were wrong. This is a crowd that is anxious to do something and to quote one incoming member, we want the U.S. government to get off its ass on this issue. Well I think the usual Sussex still will lead the charge, but there are, without naming names, I think there are quite a number of the incoming members that are pretty serious about the issue.