 Roberto asks, is it possible in Outlook desktop, insert an HTML signature? I need to create a signatures email with images, and that is visible in write mode also from, I don't know, that's supposed to be night mode, also from mobile phone. It's certainly possible. I have not done that myself specifically. So you're saying there's a chance. Absolutely. As a matter of fact, hopefully Christian will be able to pick up the article that I gave him a link to and will provide that. It is a step-by-step recipe for creating an HTML signature. Yeah. I mean, my ad here, so we'll include the link you'll have here in the article to that article. There are also third-party tools which are not expensive at all that are fantastic. I'm a big fan of Exclaimer. My disclaimer for Exclaimer is that they're a client. I've worked with them for years as a partner and I'll highly recommend their centralized email signature management solution, very low cost for small orgs. It's a great SMB solution, and that solves this and do a lot of other cool things that Roberto is not asking for, like you can actually integrate it in and change a signature based on triggers in our automate flow, for example. So there's a lot that you can do to automate that, and you can have email signatures that automatically change for your organization based on a campaign that's running and when the campaign expires, so it's just a really cool application. So there's a lot of ways that I know there's competitive solutions that are out there as well. So I always say it's like you can spend your time going and trying to figure something out and create yourself or you can go and buy a low cost solution and somebody that's been doing it for years and does it a lot better, more professional, than you could do on your own. The only hole I'm going to poke, say I'm just good at pokey holes and things. The only hole I'm going to poke in this is those are fantastic and they look nice and they're lovely. Just remember that not all email processing is HTML driven, and so therefore if you get something that does not parse the HTML properly, your signature is going to end up being about this big. So just keep it in. Especially if you're using embedded images. Yeah, seven bit UU encoded images, yeah. And so if they put in an HTML signature, are they going to get like these broken image links and all of this other nonsensical text at the bottom of the signature? Yeah, so it makes you wonder, should you be using an HTML signature? I don't know what the default is in that look, but it always looks bad when you see the broken image tag. Outlook defaults to HTML. But again, if you're linking to an image, that can be a broken image, but if you UU encode the image and put it in line, that'll show up on any HTML viewer. And for those who don't have HTML, it's going to be a block of junk garbage text. So it's broken link or bunch of junk. You know, you kind of have to pick. To be fair, we're in a world now. Now, had this been several years ago, I might not say this, but I think we're in a world where we're almost over that 80 percent hump, where 80 percent of people who are interacting with email and some nature are probably doing it in an HTML way. But I still think there are some people who do use kind of older viewers or whatever have, maybe if you think about going through government restricted things where they don't allow HTML to come through for the parsing reasons, anything that's in a secure environment, some of those types of things have a reason to do it. Or any UNIX-based system user. Exactly. And some people are just telling them, got a friend here locally that still runs Yudora. So I think it depends on your target audience. Right? If your target audience is primarily people who are not going to have an issue with that, you're probably okay. But if you think about who your target audience is and any number of them are going to be people who fit into the criteria of not being able to parse that HTML, then you might want to rethink it. Know your audience. Sorry, my gentle slam there at UNIX. You know it's true. Is HTML still that new fangled technology? Yeah. It's what all the kids are doing these days, Sean. Not really. That HTML. Yeah.