 We believe that the emerging space actors, such as Brazil, can and should play a key role in advancing the role of preventing conflict in space. We are ideally placed to act as honest brokers. There's a difference between toxic competition and noble competition. Noble competition strives for that win-win whilst avoiding monopoly. And I think that the real threat to sport sustainability is the lack of full space environment impact assessments of systems before they are deployed. It's our responsibility to foster a story of cooperation. I would advocate for a set of penalties that are effectively deterring the behavior of operators who would not otherwise be responsible. Well, we need to include China and newer players who are putting now large quantities of spacecraft into orbit that in previous years they had not been to that degree in all of these agreements because it's a global commons. The way I would look at this, the two bins that I would categorize the evolution and the development of the Space Force and the rationale for it, is the combination of our, the United States and our allies and partners, increased reliance on space for national prosperity and for security coupled with, again, an increased growth or a trend in the threat environment. We've assembled an orbital debris review team in-house to evaluate how NASA can be a more effective leader in the area of space sustainability.