 Thank you. Thank you. Today what do we have? We have four crops. Actually it's become three because the canola is so polluted that they can't sell the GM canola anymore except for biofuel. So it's really corn, soya, cotton. Humanity has eaten 8,500 plant species. Many of them uncultivated. Today we are trading in 8 and the expansion is in corn and soya. Did the world say give me more soya? Give me more corn? Is this feeding the world? No. Only 10% of the corn and soya goes into the human food system directly. 90% is going to run cars biofuels and I don't call it animal feed because animals didn't want grain, they're herbivores, they wanted grass, they wanted to be free. They are being tortured with intensive feed. So it's such an inefficient system. 10% of the food destroying 75% of the planet, 75% of the species destruction because of industrial monocultures, 75% of the water being wasted on the planet because of industrial agriculture, 75% of the soils being desertified and degraded because of industrial chemical farming. And as my book Soil Not Oil shows 40% of the greenhouse gases that are causing climate instability come from an industrial globalized system of agriculture. So if you do a very rough calculation, if 75% destruction is giving us around 25% overall food, 10% from corn and soya, if we were to destroy the entire planet we'd still only reach about 33% of the food supply which couldn't be guaranteed because if there's no soil, there's no water, there's no biodiversity, there is no food. So it is a guaranteed recipe for extinction. And yet it's being pushed as an efficient scientific system. There's no science in it. It doesn't take science to throw war chemicals into agricultural systems. It doesn't take science to shoot with a gene gun, a gene that doesn't belong to a plant. These are blind violent technologies and blindness is being treated as knowledge and science.