 And I'd also like to say that the effects of deforestation could be very serious because this will increase drought, it is increasing drought, it will increase water stress in forests and grasslands and increase the frequency and intensity of wildfires. So all of this is really something that reinforces the problems of climate change. And we know that there are several parts of the world which are already living in a state of water stress. If you look at the case of Africa, for instance, we have projected in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report that by 2020, as early as that, you'll have something like 75 to 250 million people living in a state of water stress. Now think of how this could be redressed through major afforestation activities. And here is something that I feel the forestry profession has to bring about rather rapidly and that's essentially the effective use of scientific knowledge on a large scale. One has seen a decline not only in the research related to forestry and I must say C4 is doing a remarkable job of filling up the vacuum but this is something that has to happen in every country of the world where you carry out adequate research on forestry science and ensure that its outputs are applied effectively to the practice of forestry as a profession and as an activity. I also want to emphasize the fact that as CO2 concentrations increase and climate changes, feedbacks from terrestrial stores of carbon in forests and grasslands and in soils, wetlands, beatlands, et cetera, will take place and therefore the predicted atmospheric CO2 concentration at the end of this century will be much higher than a number of models have actually projected. In fact, these couplings are going to be extremely important and in the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC we're going to focus on them deeply. I might also mention that in the AR5, the Fifth Assessment Report, we're going to look at what we call representative concentration pathways, the concentration of greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere, getting into the negative range. You know there's a big clamour and in a small mischievous way I've also added to that to say that the earth must only deal with a temperature increase of 1.5 degrees Celsius and not 2 degrees Celsius. Now this is something as I've clarified on several occasions, I cannot say as chairman of the IPCC, but we now have enough knowledge as we brought out in the Fourth Assessment Report of the very serious impacts of climate change in the range of 1 to 2 degrees Celsius increase in temperature and therefore naturally in view of that knowledge and in view of the fact that several societies in the Maldives, in Bangladesh and in other areas where there's a serious problem of food security are now clamouring for the limit at 1.5 degrees Celsius rather than 2 degrees Celsius. And if we're going to bring that about then clearly we have to pull out carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. It's not enough in my view to only reduce emissions, you'll have to somehow turn the direction of carbon dioxide emissions and at some point in time, based on feasibility, we should be able to reduce the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And what's going to be the most viable option for doing that? Obviously forestry and the increase in forest stocks across the world. And the economics of doing this are very, very attractive. For instance, the importance of identifying approaches to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions from deforestation and forest degradation need to be addressed. I'm afraid this kind of economic analysis has not been done adequately in different locations and under different conditions. And that I think is an extremely urgent task which must be taken in hand. It's also necessary to look at how bringing forests under the umbrella of cap and trade, greenhouse gas emission reduction policies would really work out because I think we need to think in terms of the institutional arrangements, the verification, the monitoring, the measurement. Because in the absence of that, we really won't be able to get off to a quick start if there is a cap and trade regime that comes into existence. I want to go back to what I said about the fact that forestry decisions have yielded space to decisions in other sectors rather than the other way around. And here is a quotation that I'd like to present before you from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report which says, forestry can make a very significant contribution to a low-cost global mitigation portfolio that provides synergies with adaptation and sustainable development. This is a perfect example of mitigation and adaptation going together. And we have determined very clearly that if we really want to meet this challenge of climate change, we would need a mix of both adaptation as well as mitigation actions. So I continue with the quote. It says, however, this opportunity is being lost in the current institutional context and lack of political will to implement and has resulted in only a small portion of this potential being realized at present end of quote. But political will is something, as my friend Mr. Al Gore says, is a renewable resource. And I think that political will has to be generated through grassroots actions. And therefore, I think it is essential for us on the part of those who are really concerned about activities in this sector and concerned about the problem of climate change in general that we create the conditions by which this political will bubbles up to the top. And that I think is a major challenge. So I would stop here. I don't want to leave you with a sense of disappointment that enough is not happening. There are plenty of interesting examples. For instance, not only interesting in a professional sense, but perhaps in a human sense. In Indonesia, I've been told that starting in 2009 on Java, each newlywed couple is to plant 10 trees. And I hope they do that before the honeymoon, because otherwise they might lose sight of it. And each divorced couple is to plant 50 trees in order to combat deforestation in Java. So, you know, if somebody divorces and then marries again, then I think they are huge benefits. So maybe that's what we should propose to these people. Thank you very much.