 Parliament session, during the last Parliament session, we had raised this issue of Pegasus and because we felt that it was an attack on the democratic structure, on the foundations of our nation and we had jointly blocked Parliament. So today the Supreme Court has given its opinion and basically supported what we were saying. What we were saying, we were asking three basic questions, who authorized Pegasus? Which agency, which person authorized Pegasus? As we all know, Pegasus cannot be bought by a private individual, it has to be bought by a government, it is a weapon. So our first question was who authorized Pegasus? Our second question was who are the victims of Pegasus, who is it used against? Because there is a list of people including politicians, opposition leaders, BJP members, Supreme Court people, so there is a Chief Justice of India, there is a list of people. So we asked who are these people that have been attacked? And the final thing was, and I think this is a very important thing, did any other country have access to information of our people? Were they privy, was this data kept with them? And we did not get any answer, in fact no reply was given to us. Pegasus is an attempt to crush Indian democracy, it is an attempt to make sure that the vibrancy of the democracy, the conversation they take place in a democracy are crushed and people are controlled. So it is a big step that the Supreme Court has said that they are going to look into this matter. I am confident that we will get the truth out of this. So if you have any questions, in the, sorry, in the session of parliament, Pegasus was the one who raised the issue, Pegasus is an attack on the institutions of the country, and we asked three questions, who bought Pegasus, because Pegasus cannot buy a private party or an individual, Pegasus can only buy a government, this is a weapon, and we asked who gave authorization to the government, who signed off, the second question was, who put Pegasus on whom, on whom people were tapped, on whom their phones were infected, because there is a list in which the name of Chief Justice, the name of the CEO, the name of the opposition leaders, the name of the MPs of the BJP, the name of many activists, so we asked which people were used, and the last question, which is a very important question, is the data of Pegasus, was it with any other country, or only with the Indian government, when we did not get the answer, we stopped the parliament, jointly, together, we stood together and we stopped the parliament, at that time you also said, see, the government is running the parliament, why are the Congress party and Vibhaksha stopping, we stopped it because it is an attack on our country, it is an attack on our people, and our vibrant democracy is an attempt to destroy it, now if you have any questions, then ask, we will start with you, PTI, well of course, this is now going to be looked at by the court, but as I said, central institutions of this country were attacked by Pegasus, we all know that that is not the only attack that is taking place, there are many different ways in which the idea of India is being attacked, Pegasus is of course a particularly nasty and subversive way of doing it, it is a way basically to control the politics of the country, to frighten people, to blackmail them into not doing what they are supposed to do, not allowing the democratic process to work, for us, we are quite happy that the Supreme Court has accepted to look into this, there is the institution of parliament where we will raise this again, and we will try to have a debate in parliament, I am pretty sure the BJP would not like that debate, so they will make sure that that debate is told, but we will try to hold that debate, and then we will tell the people of India that the idea of India is being attacked. Thank you, Siddharth, from A&I, but now it is in the court matter, so it is being enquired, but we want it to be discussed in parliament, and look, Pegasus or Prime Minister has ordered, or Home Minister has ordered, no other person can order this, and if the Prime Minister has attacked our country with another country, then we want to hear the Prime Minister's opinion, because if we see legally, then Pegasus is illegal, it is not legal in India to do snooping using Pegasus, so we would like to know why the Prime Minister is doing an illegal act, he is not above the nation, he is not above the institutions, was this information that was coming, the data that Pegasus was getting, there were chief ministers, former prime ministers, the data that was coming, what was the Prime Minister getting, what was the Home Minister being given, we want to know, because if the election commission's phone is being tapped, if its data goes to the Prime Minister, if the data of the CEC, the data of the opposition leaders, goes to the Prime Minister, this is a criminal act, there is no other way of putting this, so we will follow that also. Thank you, one second, let me go to Sunil first, and I will come for the second round of question. Look, the court is going to look into this matter, and I am no one to comment on the action of the Supreme Court, and what they choose to do, I hope they will do their job and provide justice, but this is a deeper problem, right, as I said, if the Prime Minister of India was privy to this information, I see it is one thing if you are using Pegasus to find out about terrorism, you are using Pegasus to find out about national security, that is a different issue, there are questions even about that, but that is a different issue, but if the Prime Minister is using this as a personal tool, meaning if the data is arriving on the Prime Minister's desk, then that is totally criminal, right, and we will follow that up, we will make sure that that is followed up. Thank you, Raman from News 24. Sarkaray, sorry, governments have been dropped, right, governments have been dropped in Karnataka, the government was dropped using Pegasus, So, Supreme Court's decision is, so why won't they agree, but our three or four questions, we need an answer to this, who ordered this, whose data was being given, and on what basis was this ordered, but it is definitely a good step. Thank you, sir, ashtak. No, this issue is the opposite, right, this is an issue where the government of India is attacking the national security of the country, right, our data, Indian data, data especially of senior people being handed to a foreign country is an attack on the national security of this country, so if it is in case, if it is true that this data is held outside India, data of our Chief Election Commissioner, our opposition leaders, our Chief Minister is held outside India, then the government of India has attacked India itself, so there is no question of hiding behind national security, this is national security, they are attacking national security. Thank you, sir, Ashish. That of course, I mean, if we cooperate, why not cooperate, but the government cannot answer, because the truth is, it is an illegal action and only two people can have done that action, third person cannot have done that action. Mr. Gadkari cannot have taken this decision, right, some other minister could not have taken it, the prime minister or the home minister has authorized this, my guess is they will not get an answer, it will be very difficult for the government to answer these questions. Thank you, Mr. Dubey. Thank you, Mr. Mukesh Koshy. I think now it is in the hands of the Supreme Court, so we have to respect that. If the Supreme Court is looking into it and then we say, okay, now also we are going to look into it, I don't think that would be an appropriate response. I think now it is in the highest court in the country. Let's see what they do. Also, political bigwigs, that is not the point. Here, the institutional structure of India, there is the election commission, there is the parliament, there are the chief ministers, this is our local constitution, this is the agreement on it. So this is not just a political matter, this is an existential matter for the country. This is the reason why you are looking at a kind of muted opposition. So this is the agreement on the local constitution and these two people have mastered it. And the idea of India from 1947 to 1947, that this country will be a democratic, democratic country in which our citizens will get protection, in which our media will get protection, in which all our people will get privacy, this is the agreement on it. And this is one way of that agreement, there are different ways too, in which the ED is being used, in which the CBI is being used, in which the discussion is not being allowed in the parliament, these are all different ways that the idea of India is going to be destroyed, of course, of course, yes, yeah. Thank you.