 Thank you very much. Thank you, organizers, for giving me a chance to share my ideas with you, maybe not ideas, but my struggle with this material. After so many presentations about which is on film or how it is different between this different region, I decided to skip part of my presentation because I will repair that soon. This map we already have, so I won't comment it, but my test area is Szczecin-Lowland. It is an area on both sides of Lower Older River and Szczecin-Lagun and Pomeranian Bay, so it has both sides of contemporary Polish-German border. It's here, the three different views of this area, it's north-western part of Poland, and in fact it is a north-western area of marginal, so that's why I have a problem with this material. I was trained in Greater Poland and on Szczecin-Lowland material, so working with Pomeranian material, I was shocked how different they are from inland tradition in terms of style, ritual, and temporal changes. Going back to archival materials, I was confronted with quite gloomy picture, small-scale excavation, selective manner of publishing if already published materials, or excavating very generalized views and comments and theories based on single observation, not repeatable. So what makes the story more gloomy is the fact that we have retraveled history during the 20th century, and the methodology was not comparable between researchers of this time. No, it's not in this, ah, no, it's in this. Before I start, we already heard that the Ornfield tradition is far from homogeneity, and the Pomeranian is very, very different from this material, and before I start also on a quick chronology remark, saying late Bronze Age, I mean on usually 4th and 3rd Montailles Bronze Age, because based on the Hortes, this is something like this comparable with the Snowden periodization, but with the early Iron Age, I have a problem with Pomeranian materials because they are usually materials that are connected with Gorica group, or Gorica group, contemporary to Hashtag sea, but we don't have any Hashtag sea style on Pomerania, so actually it's the flowing time of Bronze Age, not the end, something new. It's a continuation rather than something new, so I would like to push the border between Bronze and Iron Age a little bit closer to the end of the first millennium before Christ. Okay, here is my test area with all materials I already have. These black belts are field surveys. There are lots of points, but I won't discuss this right now, but there is a lot of material, but very less information we can obtain from these materials. I try to scratch the view that was in our literature, and we have here this traditional way. We have something that is really very close in terms of rituals to Urnfield, but for every of these points there is a bot. And I'm going to discuss it in details. I try to look for long lasting symmetry. And I have two. One is surely long lasting, and the other it's hard to say. First one is Vartin. Vartin was discovered in late 19th century. It is a bar of symmetry. And this symmetry was excavated before Second World War and soon after. Here we have a plan that was published in 1956, I think summing up the previous excavation outcomes based on the description on the map. This is a quite small area. It's approximately one square kilometer, and we have different kinds of materials here. We have a bar of symmetries. In fact, we have three groups of graves, bar of graves. There is one flat symmetry, and there are some traces of settlement activity dated from Neolithic up to the end of the Bronze Age. So this area was in use for more than 2,000 years. Based on the chronology of both grave and settlement data, this is the thing I've said already. The older barrows, early Bronze Age... Oh, this is not Bronze Age, this is a long barrow of LBK. Sorry, not LBK, Funeral Biker Culture. We have also on this group of... on this area 18 information graves in the stone cysts and without stone construction. They are here, they are dated to the early Bronze Age. And then we have barrows, not this. Barrows, these barrows that are dated to late phases of the early Bronze Age, or middle Bronze Age are situated in this area, in the northwestern part of this barrow group. Also, we have barrows that are connected with the Montelius Bronze Age IV and V. And during the final phases of the Bronze Age contemporary with the hashtag C, there is a small flat cemetery here and the other group of flat graves just near the biggest barrow of the cemetery and the biggest barrow is connected. It is a barrow above middle Bronze Age grave. So we have different traditions here. During those barrows, flat cemeteries mostly covered cremation grave. So it does something orn't feel like. There are several types of grave. Grave in Orn could be dug into the older barrow, dug into the space between the barrows and covered by a completely new barrow. The cremation seems to be a dominant way of disposing the dead. There is also a new group of graves, the small flat cemeteries. This is also a late Bronze Age grave. Grave goods in the late Bronze Age phase of the cemetery are very scarce. Mostly we have here amphora type pot orn with long cylindrical neck. This is the fourth stage of the cemetery based on the map. And then we have this final stage. I still don't want to call it early Iron Age, but it is described as such. There are some Iron Age metals or pieces of iron items inside the graves. But still we have barrows over cremation grave. And the other cemetery I chose for comparison is Dolica. Dolica in fact there are two cemeteries in Dolica. Both cemeteries are placed on moraine ridge over small Inna river. Dolica 30 consists of 20 burrows of which only two were excavated. And no surroundings around these burrows were excavated. So we don't know if there were any flat burials or not. And the Dolica 40 cemetery is even bigger. It consists of 80 burrows, but only 8 were excavated. And there was some excavation between the burrows. So we have also information about 63 flat graves outside the burrows. Burrows contained one centrally placed grave chamber with urn graves. There was also secondary graves dug into the burrow slopes. Flat graves consist usually of urn placed within the nest. Here is a group of so-called flat graves. It is a urn standing inside a stone circle or nest-like stone structure. There are only two metal objects within whole cemeteries excavated. So it is very difficult to build any chronological line between these graves. All I can say that on Pyrzica plain this is the place where the Dolica site is. During the late stages of the Bronze Age the idea of covering cremation graves with the burrow is still present. But it's not the only form of the grave architecture as such. And other thing is that the cremation seems to be rule without exception, but we don't have any skeletal remains dated to the late Bronze Age or with the materials that is contemporary with the late Bronze Age. So we are not able to verify the hypothesis that there was or in fact or against such a hypothesis that there was any other alternative way of disposing the dead. Oh my God, we need a slide. Okay, this is material from the Dolica. Sorry, it's the typical material of the late Bronze Age. Nothing special in that. And it's not very, very different between the graves, so there's no any tips to build this chronology scale. Okay, in or not without it. We have different graves. Most of them are in Ur. There is also a hypothesis that the earliest crematory cremation graves were just distributed, the remains were distributed over the grave. But we have actually two very rich graves, the richest I think. Here we have one. It is in Bania. It was discovered in the early 20th century where there is a cremation grave, where the rest are on the bottom of stone paving and under the stone paving. In fact, there is no above ground structure above this grave. And there are items 62, bronze items that are similar to the style of the third and fourth Bronze Age. There is another grave less rich, I will say. With the same scenario, we have cremates distributed over the floor of the grave with some materials, but it's not very characteristic for chronology distribution. There is also something like four Bronze Age. Most graves are just urn without any metal elements. There are only one urn. Sometimes there is some additional pot and some very, very few fragments of a thermally-altered bronze item. It's hard to say for all fragments. So, going back to the question, urn-feel or not, this question also has a long history and a gloomy history. Generally speaking, it is something urn-feel like. The cremation must have been linked with a very attractive worldview and this worldview was attractive enough for people on the lower order. So, they, generally speaking, bought the idea, adjusted to their own taste and tradition. Except for cremation with the scarcity of grave goods, other elements of the lower order materials, I mean, hordes and pottery style, are not so heavily linked, so closely linked to urn-feel-to-word. There are many traces that are connected with more northern words, so I would say that it's southern bardic, late Bronze Age, and thank you very much.