 This is an interesting project I'd like to show. This is through some of the poorest areas in Bogota. We made a 23-kilometer pedestrian street, very high quality, even underground cables and the like. In some areas there was no city yet, and then this was land bought by government for housing projects. The artery for development was the pedestrian street. Complete, this is an interesting project. See, underground cables, pedestrian space, bicycle way, and the cars in the mud. It's different values, I mean. The new city begins to grow around the pedestrian street, more than around a car street. See, normally this is the typical illegal development in the process of advancing and legalizing. Normally the car pavement would have been done first. This we did first. First for pedestrian bicycles, after for payments for the cars. Different values are created. Respect for humans. Children going to school, the bicycle shops open next to it. See the lady, see again the car in the mud, the pedestrian street next to it. Children going to all. This is a different concept. I think we should have a network of hundreds of kilometers of pedestrian streets. How white should sidewalks be, as white as you can make them. Then in a thing we made infrastructure for a pedestrian next to poor neighborhoods for to enjoy them, the waterfront. To go out to the countryside in pedestrian street next to canals, all next to drainage canal. Should be pedestrian spaces. What you can do with a drainage canal and some pedestrian infrastructure. A protected bicycle always not cute architectural feature in a city. It is a right, unless one thinks that only motor vehicle owners have a right to save mobility. Even the poorest have a bicycle. A protected bicycle always a symbol that shows that a citizen on a $30 bicycle is as important as one on a $30,000 car. So now from almost 0% in seven years, Bogota now has 5% of its population using bicycles every day. They are saving one and a half monthly minimum wage every year. Infancy bridges for bicycles. Large roads are necessary, but they must have quality pedestrian infrastructure next to them, next to poor neighborhoods. We are going to build them and make nice pedestrian spaces next to these neighborhoods. Public pedestrian space is not a luxury. It's as necessary as hospitals or roads. In the future, low income citizens will have access to most goods. Having income citizens have today, computers or mobile phones. Access to green spaces will be a crucial source of inequality or equality if we really create parks, such as central parks and things like this. Parks and pluses are as necessary again as road or hospital. This we demolish downtown with a huge social program, 23 hectares to create a park in the middle of some downtown area. The again, space for children, space for cars, the same picture. Parks in the poor neighborhoods, parks are important again, even in the poorest neighborhoods, artificial turf, soccer fields, large parks in the middle of the poorest areas. And we buy even land for the future, even if we don't have money to make the park yet. And now to finish, the idea again is not just to solve this long problem but to avoid them. So I think we have to buy land in advance next to it. So national government gives $4,500 subsidy for $1,500 houses. We created an agency which buys land next to the city, either voluntarily or through eminent domain at rural prices. And the private developers who build the houses, but they have only two years to develop this to build the houses and their maximum price of $15,000. This is the type of developments with lots of parks, well designed, this is the type of slums that were there before and this is the new type of development with a lot of infrastructure, pedestrian, this city type of houses, 40 square meter houses for $15,000 and they can add up another 20 meter and we get very high densities, about 340 inhabitants per hectare, sidewalks, some of them are with higher densities like this. And this is the land, yes, this is the land next to Bogota and as rural land, right there, you see the city, right there. This land should not be privately owned. Although it's outside the urban area, it is, this land is adjacent to it with good public transport, this land is only 25 minutes from downtown. This land around developing country cities and even land which seems very rural in Mumbai today should be publicly owned. I know for example of some Latin American investors which have a lot of land around Indian cities. I think it's very absurd that this is becoming and speculating feature because this is the main obstacle to solving the needs for housing with good quality public spaces and good planning. So I really would suggest very respectfully that the Indian state at any level which is relevant should acquire all or most of the land, the rural land around the cities because it's very likely that the cities will grow much farther than what you imagine today with good public transport, all of this land can be accessible anywhere in the city. Thank you. Thank you very much, Enrique. You always inspire us and challenge us and we look forward to more conversation.