 Proste. Proste, je tudi svojo vrste. Vrste, da v svojo vrste. Vrste. Značil sem, kako vrste rediči, zato sem vrste za vrste vrste. Kako vrste vrste. Kako vrste vrste. To je moja izgleda. Vrste s mojej doli. To je mene, mene, vrste. Zelo smo na Eduardo Scarpe, ki je naredil v 1854, ali nekaj ne bo naredil v 1854, ker bih bih bih nekaj vzostavili. V zelo v autobijagrafi, različ je je 1554, različ je je 1553. Zelo nekaj nekaj nekaj Eduardo je naredil, naredil naredil naredil, naredil naredil naredil naredil naredil naredil, da je naredil na moj angljač. Feminine nekaj nekaj, vikipidesi naredil, in vse bovje se zelo. ki sem pojena, da je mym zelo, da je tudi naredil v 1925. Pa je tektore, pljeraj, bilet, teater, vzelo, dobroz, je to jedno z pojemer, ki je všeč kaj na vsega. In vsega autobijografija je tukaj 50 ljudi na vsega vsega. Včeš, ta autobijografija je tukaj, je tukaj. Však je však zelo tukaj na konceptu tukaj. Vzelo, da je však tukaj. Bill Bambridge in Martin Rotblat vse zelo, tukaj, je tukaj, tukaj, tukaj za všeč, za všeč, za všeč. Biografija, pizdi, filmi, tukaj, však rekord, ki je vseč, za všeč. Znávo bih neko ima v sezivnih vsezivnih, da se nekaj nekaj neče vsezivnoidade. Kako se ni vsezivnoj vsezivnih? To nisem. Tko tal, da boljič zelo to nekaj nekaj nekaj nekaj nekaj nekaj. Moj dobi, da se vedno o Meduardovom autobijaguče, kako smo je lepo 전čni, kako si vedno nekaj dobi, učniti vši postaviti... ...ne kako je s grabbedom. Ok, tko nosimo se desno. Nekaj ne se diči, in tudi izsob drawingsi je bočk nosi in repod si rekonstrati in resurektaje. Potom jen evutne vsobe Colden in Martin. To je bilo, da je to, da ne. Zato ga vam pogledaj na technologijskih resubrečnjah. Kaj je prijev tačnega v trajnji, koncert, da ga tudi pričim, aslo se prijev na drugo, je da vse je zelo počke, kako je tehnologija, počke vsojnega, počka in v srečenjem, And make a copy of whatever is in the mind of a person before that. And then instinct the copy in the present, and that's it. You have resurrected the person. Sometimes you can complete the mind file with data that exists. But sometimes the data doesn't exist anymore in the present. For example, this is Edwards Theater in Napoli, Italy. ta teater in Napoli, italii, ali je tudi nekaj počin, ker teater ne nekaj je nekaj. Vsah je, da smo v tudi veči v tudi in zato vse informacije, da smo vse zelo našli. To je tehnologijna resovacija. In sem jaz nekaj, nekaj, tehnologij, kaj smo vse zelo našli, ki se počin je, zil. Fondacijen technologi o resurečnjo sem sem dužel in katera dužel in teorij, dužel in posljenočne vse, kaj je prav je? Ne znam je. Nami ne znam taj sigel, bila, je to počet nekaj provoz, njih poslutam vse, da sem odpravila mojej broj, da se vse oboživamo. V seelji, ki sem da bila, o technologijust'ke resurrecije, nagi je tun ne raznega v štrih. To nagi je bil ne raznega v nešte dake. Proste pa se značijo večsakorti, ušlični, llevni, transendni in ultra-technologi. Kaj je začel tudi vse z ESTVORATI in tudične galaxi v vsoce, na neko pravno zelo, da lahko svači dojati izgledaj, da ne zelo, je časno zelo, da ne bo v roju. Zelo je dolge začo, nekaj je neko zelo, pa je dobro. In bilo, na vse, neko v neko, sem počasnjala, počasnjala, in da nekaj počasnja, da se rada, da nekaj nekaj, da nekaj nekaj, Tako nekaj ne museli smo vzivati, da se izpravimo. Zato vzivam se, da je to neče ovo, ki je zelo prej vsega način, je bilo, da je so začin način način. To je tudi ovo, da je začin način v 16.00, je technologično, da je vsega začin način vziv, was to g0 to the moon with a birds. Who is the first one who can say why that wouldn't work? That's one of the many reasons, there is no air in space, so it cannot be done, but it does matter, because there are other technologies that do enable us to reach to the moon in view of the fact that we know how to get to the moon. I think these old science fiction books Kako je način, je instrument, da četiraj nekaj idej začeli zelo začin. In se zelo da se pomembnači, kako je nekaj zelo začin. Zelo počin, da je instrument technologi, ki se tukaj veči potrešem. Zelo, nekaj način, nekaj mali modeli, ki je, da neko, tudi privoljene, nekoč nekaj, način. Ko je zelo začin zelo začin? z drugi dimensičnji. Zato ne pačo način taj tega z Martin Gardner. Zato sem tudi včasnil, da v svoj 19. sejturi koncept v drugi dimensičnji je vsezretno vsezretno po vsezretnjih vsezretno vsezretno vsezretno površenje. Svezretno vsezretno vsezretno je to, da je glasba v 4. dimensičnih. Všeč je tudi 3-dimensičnji vsef, v vast 4-dimensičnih. V 4. dimensičnih. Tukaj je sop, bobolj. Tukaj je film, 2-dimensičnji vsef in 3-dimensični vsef. Vsef je tukaj vsef in 3-dimensični vsef. that is the way to visualize a fourth dimension that can be mathematicalins geometrically complex. And you hear a lot of fourth dimension in modern physics, especially string theory. As a matter of fact, you hear about many more dimensions therefore. They say ten dimension in maybe depending on an interpretation point is really 11-dimension. However, the concept is that our world, you, me, everyone, everything, is a membrane, we say brain, in a higher dimensional bulk. And so you have our world here, and the real world of leaves and trees and sunshine is outside the space that we can perceive. OK, well, I hope everyone has seen Interstellar. Great movie. Who hasn't seen Interstellar? Whoa, that's a good advertisement for the film. The concept of traveling through the fourth dimension, and even of beings that live in the fourth dimension, is one of the central concepts in Interstellar. Keep torn the Nobel Prize of 2017 for the first detection of gravitational waves. By the way, I believe he was born here in Utah, and this culturally enormous was also born in the church. He describes the fourth dimension in the book. All the particles and all the forces and the fields known to humans are confined to our brain with one exception, gravity, and the warping of spacetime associated with gravity. There might be other kind of matters and fields and forces that have four space dimensions and reside in the bulk. In this illustration I have outward is here. Everything that we can see and touch and perceive is here. But you have other things that live outside the three-dimensional fabric of our reality. Gravity is one of these things, and there might be other particles that are able to freely move in the bulk. And there is this concept that taking a very complicated path through the four-dimensional bulk, one could be able to access times that from the perception of an observer living in the brain would be located in the past. I'm not going to go into any detail, there is a very good book, The Perfect Wave, which explains this theory, together with many scientific papers, of course. I have to underline that this is a theory. It's not established science, but let's use a bit of imagination here. Let's use even more imagination to imagine beings that live in the bulk and have access to what we could only call magic and transcendent technology now. By the way, one of the people who developed the theory that I was mentioning before said that perhaps in the distant future we will evolve so that our consciousness resides in a bowl of sterile neutrinos, which are hypothetical particles that according to theories will be able to access the fourth-dimensional bulk. And now you can imagine that if superintelligent being with access to ultra-technology live in the bulk, they could be able to engineer worlds like ours. I'm going to free answer the question, who is this woman here? Is she a god or is she a future human engineer? My answer is that she could be both. And perhaps the difference is not as sharp as many people think. Perhaps our descendent could become like god. Did anyone called Joseph Smith say something like that? Like 100 years ago, yes, he did. Genesis revisited. So let's imagine a piece of magic ultra-technology. Some thing that we can move through the fourth dimension, get it very close to our three-dimensional brain and take a very high definition picture of what is on the brain. I think that device looks familiar. In fact, we all have that device, a similar device in our pocket. And I want to emphasize here the point that from the point of view of my ancestor, Eduardo Skarpet, this is a magic device. This is really magic technology. If you have in your pocket, you look at something called the internet, whatever that is, you can use it to talk in real time with someone on the other side of the planet, warfront for Eduardo. That's ultra-tech, super-tech transcendent tech. And he died only in less than 100 years ago. Who can imagine what our descendants will be able to do in what magic technology they might develop in hundreds or thousands of years. I think some brain scanner printer like this is within the realm of what is physically possible in the very interesting universe that we happen to inhabit. OK, so how to bring Eduardo back? Well, that is simple now. We have all the elements. The picture of Eduardo on the brain. That's it. You scan the past, you make a copy of Eduardo, and you move it to another brain. Or you move it to the same brain. That could be an engineered brain that looks very much like our own world, perhaps with some improvements. Or you can bring Eduardo directly into the book, the universal world that we do not perceive, the world of the leaves and the clouds and the trees here. Now, from his point of view, it would be a very unusual environment. So I think they would first put him in some kind of simulated virtual reality-like environment to make him feel at home. And I think if they studied his life, they would put him in this home, which is the home that he built in Napoli. And here he had written, qui ridoye, that in Italian means, here I am the one who loves. After spending so many years making other people love, he wanted a place where he could love himself. And I believe in some part of the hyper-dimensional reality that I have been exploring in this short talk, I think Eduardo is laughing and smiling at us. And I hope you enjoyed my presentation and thank you very much. Do you have any time for questions or does anyone who wants to ask a question? We have a couple of minutes. What if Eduardo is doing something better than coming back to Earth and he does not want to come back? Well, thank you. That's a very good question. I can give two different answers. One is that if you read his biography and for his only available in Italian, you see that he was someone who loved life. And they think that is an answer in itself. Why would he want to come back instead of not coming back? I think because he loved life. And I hope everyone here can be the same thing. Now, coming to the second part of your question, what if he is doing something that is so much better than coming back to a place like this? Who said that there must be only one of Eduardo? He was an actor. He played lots of different characters. And I think I'm not an actor myself, but when you are an actor and you play a character, you really become your character. So there has not been only one Eduardo Skarpet. There have been many of them. And what's wrong is one more. Two different Eduardo could be doing two different things at the same moment. Don't forget that time is a concept much more complex than we usually think. So that I think one of him would want to come back. I have a question. What's the impetus for these supposed future creatures to go and bring them back? If they're free from being embedded in linear time that we exist, there already is an Eduardo who's always there. So what would be the point of duplicating him? That's a very good point. And my answer would be that the permanent version of Eduardo that according to any block universe like theories does exist in spacetime is not necessarily a version that could have subjective experiences. It's more like a page on a book. Now if someone is motivated to bring Eduardo back in a format that he's able to think and feel, then I think they would not leave him as only a page on a book but bring him back to reality in a more experience and experiencing and interacting way. Is that answer your point? Thank you very much. Thank you, Giulio.