 Good evening, everyone. So my paper takes the door recorder as a case study to discuss over the architectural decoration in so distant Anatolia between the limistic period and the hiery imperial age. Main focus will be made on Pamphylia, Chilicia, and the Nybori regions. The analysis of the evidence, compared with cases from the province of Asia, will be used to define the general characteristics of the door recorder by some case studies that are particularly significant for the understanding of the general trends. A free style spec to consider speaking about the door recorder in Asia Minor is its generalized abandonment with the advent of the imperial age. As well known in a transition from the later limistic to the hiery imperial age, the door recorder in Asia Minor suffered a progressive and marked decline, which led, in the second century AD, to the almost general abandonment of the order in public buildings. This tendency can be well understood, including in this discussion also the data from the province of Asia, where the height number of the archaeological evidence, all of us to have a general and more complete overview of this trend. As showed, the period of major use of the door recorder in public buildings lies between the third century BC up to the late second century BC. And the trends are expressed by this red light in the graph. A massive decrease started in the 3th century BC, in line with the generalized reduction of the architectural activities in Asia Minor. However, in the Augustan age, when the building activities increase again, the decline of the door recorder appeared to be already begun. Notably, an increase both in the province of Asia, but also in the southern Anatolia, is attested in the Flavian period, with a new drastic reduction after the Principate of Domitian. So, a dividends of this fact in all Asia Minor, the public building, Doric public buildings, dateable to the second century AD, a later scars, and can be considered as isolated cases. So the decrease in the number of Doric buildings with the advent of imperial age is accompanied by changes in the types of the building adopted in this architectural order. This data are particularly significant for agoras and temple buildings, where a massive decrease of the statement occurs here here from the beginning of the 3th century BC. So as regard the agora of Lirbe in Panfilia, when at least the Histora was stated to the second middle of the 3th century, represent one of the rare cases of use of the door recorder in agoras' context. Referring to the temple's architectural decoration, in Panfilia and Cilicia, we can observe two different tendencies. From one side, the use of the canonical standards of the domestic tradition, so as in the case of the Doric temple in Perge, a pre-style temple dated to the 3rd middle of the 2nd century BC, that showed the formal character of the door recorder as frequently registered for Anatolian temple buildings. By contrast, a different panorama is offered by some temples in Cilicia-Tracaya. So in the tiles, two small temples, Doric temples, at Cetiore in Ismaili, datable between the late 2nd century BC and the 3rd century BC, are in this context notable for the mixture of the Yonik architectural languages with local building techniques. If the Doric temples of Ismaili show in the formal languages some local similarities with the Funerari tower of Diochessareia, the Doric temple of Cetiore is a site in the interland, located in the interland of Elayusa, is notable as well for the employ of polygonal mensuri. In both of these cases, the languages of the door recorder are indeed matched and re-elaborated by the use of the well-established building techniques, showing a preference accorded by the local Cilicia workshop to the local constructive tradition. Going back to now, going back to the architectural decoration, the abrupt drop in the number of door buildings in the transition between the late Hellenistic and the early imperial age is accompanied by some peculiar changes in the formal solution characterizing the imperial Asiatic door recorder. Indeed, next to a conservative and local character, during the imperial age, the door recorder whiteness the emergence of novel decorative traits, almost hymen at satisfying a new aesthetic conception of the architectural decoration. So we can keep some peculiar cases to clarify these tendencies. At first, these tendencies are well-captured by the adoption of the mixed order, with the embedding of unique features into the canonical forms of the door recorder. So despite the adoption of the mixed order was not restricted to the Hellenistic age, and we can cite the Centuary of Celsus Laborundus in Caria, it was during this time that it consolidated and spread in Asia Minor, providing the basis for the subsequent experiments of the imperial age. In dark Roman buildings of Soutisan Hanatolia, the use of hybrid solution frequently developed alongside with local tendency. We can keep as reference the Hiscate of Sidae in Panfilia, a city gate traditionally dated to the Hellenistic period and recently redated to the Roman time, at least to the late 3th century BC, by the excavation carried out by the University of Graz. The gate was spiked in an Hellenistic manner, following a regional models that involves as well the city gate of Silion, Perge, where the door recorder is almost employed in the friars in the top of the gates. At Sidae, following the reconstruction proposed by Mansil, the upper boundary of the Hinsaic courtyard was covered by Ionic friars probably associated to Ionic Cason. This type of association, so Ionic Cason and Doric friars, where frequently the morphology of the friars follow the canonical standard of the Hellenistic door recorder, find a compasion in Panfilia at Silion in the Doric stowa of the Acropolis so dated in the 3rd century BC. In the imperial time, between the Flavian Age and the 2nd century AD, the usage of this solution would characterize as well Doric buildings of the neighboring regions. In Lisha, Ionic Cason was adopted in the arc of Sextos Marcos Priscos Accentos, filed under the Principate of Vespasian, as well as in the harsh of Matthews Modesto Satpatara, filed in the Trianic period, or again in the Forum Basilica of Kremna in Pesidia, a complex dated to the Principate of Hedrian and one of the last cases of Doric public buildings in Aegean Minor. In the cases showed, the usage of high-built solution is matched with a general tendency to emphasize the decorative features of the architectural decoration, which demonstrates the frequent mixture of orders in Imperial Asiatic architecture and specifically in the Doric order. As regards, it is worth to be noted the harsh of the Medreus and Apollonius sub-perge, a monument dated to the Domitianic period and notable in comparison to the other example given for the use of Doric half-pillars placed upon bases. So the presence of bases, which are traditionally extraneous to the canonical Doric order, is only occasionally attested also in the Hellenistic time. So assistance at Pergamon, Stratonicaea, or in the Hellenistic codeon of Termesos in Pesidia. During the Imperial Age, bases in the Doric order are also sporadically attested up to the Domitian age in buildings where the use of this uncommon solution express a market tendency to give a new decorative character to the house's forms of the Doric order as well captured by the Sebastiano Faus Brodicia's assistance. Indeed, next to the use of hybrid solution in Imperial Asiatic Doric order of Sudess and Anatolia, we can observe a preference accorded to the more elaborated formal design aims to meet the new aesthetic conception of the architectural decoration that occurs within the Imperial Age. Indeed, the tendency to redefine the formal languages of the Doric architectures was developed above all by the users of decorative traits as in the Gate of Lirpe, assistance, notable for the use of decorative metopes decorated by Floral motif, a solution that again find comparison in Imperial Doric building up to the Flavian Age. Going to the conclusion, element of changes in Imperial Doric order could involve as well the volumetric development of the solution following a general redefine of the canonical features by horizontal series of mouldings that are tested both in the Fries Corona and Capitals Habacus. In the stiff-sided Pergas arch, the use of mouldings in the top of the Habacus and in the upper part of the Fries was associated by Glythe, outlined by an higher semi-circular termination of this solution that is also known as Lunole. This solution was widely diffused in micro-Sati setting only during the Free Century AD and specifically in Frigia during the Flavian period, showing an influence on a regional scale as well as the exchange of common model of reference during the Imperial Age. At least this tendency to redefine the formal languages of the Doric architectures could be manifested by the introduction of new formal solution. We can't sigh to conclude the regular rendered in a continuous fillet, so this one. Amorphology not attested before the later Linnistic or the Herli Imperial Age, which could have had its first usage in Kariatstra to Nikeia or in Pesilia in the Doric fontain house of Sagalassus, and that final attestation as well in Pamphilia in a Fries block epigraphically dated to the Julian-Claudian period. So to sum up, the example given has showed attention in the development of the formal languages in the Doric order, arising from the imitation of the local tradition and its relaboration via local tendencies. This consideration stemmed from two main tendencies that which have interested the Doric order during the Imperial Age. The first, a conservative character inspired on the Doric architectural design with flourished locality during the Linnistic age. The second, a more elaborated formal design and the development of experimental hybrid solution. In both of cases, the evolutionary process that led to the definition of the Doric architecture in Imperial Age was influenced by the architectural languages embedded in the regional tradition contaminated by local workshops or borrowed from architectural model of reference, and that's applied both to the citizen and western Anatolia. To conclude, within the romanization of Isa Minor, the secular shift in the aesthetic demand toward the architectural paradigm offered by the eonic and above all by the Korean Saint Herbert orders compelet radical changes in the decorative vocabulary of the Doric order. As shown in addition to its innate conservatism, new hybrid solution arising, ganging into the Doric order a distinct character in the architectural landscape of the Imperial Age. Thank you.