 As the time is running, I was asked to share some Estonian observations about becoming a member state of EU. We have now been in the EU for 10 years, and we have a reputation to be a very good pupil, to study everything on time and fulfil the tasks of harmonisation and compliance, and we were quite age old to to have euro, and so we are in a euro zone and also in Schengen right now. So starting point could be that there is something about being a small state. Ireland is also a small state, but Estonia is much smaller. We have 1.3 million people living in Estonia, and small states need to cope with actually the demands of the EU membership, and it's not easy at all. Being a small state means to prioritise everything, we cannot afford to go to very deep specialisation in each area, so there is more generalised knowledge and experts when very deeply specialised. What we need to have is really excellent coordination to make all this small country work perfectly, and of course super-efficiency in order to use the limited resources, and of course being very flexible and open-minded to adjust all the changes we could face. So when looking back at these years, when we prepared for membership, I was working at that time in Estonian government as a Secretary-General of Estonian Ministry of Environment, and I remember very well these times when we needed to process a huge amount of legal documents, and nobody actually asked whether you could have done really proper public consultation or anything like that. It was just not reasonable because of the time span. But what happened during that time, I think our small public administration learned very much how to be very, very quick in everything, and it was a learning exercise also in the sense that we learned how to recognise all the challenges, how to reorganise ourselves very quickly, adjust to new situation, and I think we learned a very valuable asset. It is this strategic agility at that time, and many big countries actually struggling with that. Too long decision-making processes, too much discussions and no decisions. So we have learned how to do everything in turbo-regime, and sometimes it is hitting us back because we can't maybe concentrate too much, a small state on every issue, and also we needed to learn after this very high speed of European integration how to do properly, public engagement for instance, and it doesn't going to happen on turbo-speed anyway, so it's a lengthy and slow process. Another thing what we learned is a very high result-orientedness in values and thinking. The only thing what mattered was whether you get the percentage of non-hormulised regulation down and keep things up to date. Again, we needed to be able to mobilise the very short resources, and all that happened in the context of very decentralised public administration, so every ministry had its own area where they were the kings, so-called, so there was little intervention into the other ministry's governing areas. Of course it again meant that we could be very fast, but it brought along a very low culture of cooperation and coordination, and it is something we are struggling right now. Everybody now is talking in a stoner about single government, a broad whole of government feelings, better coordination, and we are not so good at it right now. Of course it means that we now are experiencing difficulties in dealing with wicked issues which are spread across the policy areas, so it was some of the experience of Estonian very fast learning and European integration as a small state. European Union has always been a very high political priority for Estonia, there has been no question whatsoever about that. Being geopolitically between Western Europe and Russia, that's the only way you could make a choice, and Estonia has always been pro-European, and it meant that every issue which was related with European Union was on a very high political agenda, and it went through very well, and there was consensus, there were no really very, very fierce debates about that, and what it meant in the long run is that I think we took some time away due to that from our internal fears. There were some significant reforms in our country which were lagged behind, which still are unfinished. One of these reforms is the local government reform, we still are having more than 200 very tiny local government units which are very difficult to run properly and finance normally in order to provide public services, and of course another big priority was Euro, and it was a very rational calculation actually for going through for Euro, because Estonia had experienced before the economic crisis a very quick economic growth, like even two digit numbers, and economy was boosting, and the inflation rate was way away of this criteria we needed to fulfill to get Euro, and the crisis actually slowed down this inflation, and it was like the window of opportunity for us to adopt Euro, and the economists calculated whether this time will pass, and so we needed to get together and be very timely, and it was a very significant instance of a very, very high political commitment. They took everything what is needed in order to get Euro, they raised taxes, they made very many unpopular choices, and also they also cut a lot of public sector costs, but the only thing which actually brought the votes back to the same government was actually not touching the pensions, so the votes were for elderly people keeping the pensions up, and even growing was the price Estonian government paid for that, and I think it was a good price, really with no irony. When we think of our role as a small state in the EU, of course we cannot do everything, and we need to make choices as said. One of the issues and areas where Estonia has tried to become one of the leading countries in Europe and also in the world is related to cyber security and ICT. We are very pro ICT thinking, we love everything related to ICT, and for each Estonian free Wi-Fi is a human right, and we get really mad and you don't have Wi-Fi which is free in Copenhagen Airport like I did this morning, so you had it in Dublin, so congratulations. So with e-services is not only the question about efficiency and transparency, it is also the question about being a modernised country, make use of the best available techniques and technologies you could think of, and also it has become one part of our economic story to tell, so Skype is from Estonia and some other quite quickly growing world-class startups are from Estonia, so we have tried to think of ourselves in the future, but why not to become Nordic Silicon Valley? This is a long way to go, but this is one of the key agenda points we want to address in the EU, that's why this digital agendas thing and cyber security is a big issue.