 Who is tracking our social issues? I am personally getting tired around how we treat social issues in Nigeria. We quickly move on from issues with no conclusive outcome on these issues. I'm still here asking these questions. What happened to Inie Umoring? What happened to Sylvester? What happened with the Ansar's movement? What happened to thousands of other issues? These issues generate national and even international attention, thanks to the power of Twitter. But we don't follow up on the outcome of these issues. How can justice really reign if we continue on this path? How do we hold the government accountable? This is our typical case scenario. A rape issue goes viral. The government is brought into it. They make a few statements. The issue is forgotten. Everyone moves on to another trend. Can we really come together and hold relevant stakeholders accountable to these social issues? We need to follow up till justice is fully served. How can people be bold enough to speak up when they already know how the outcome would be or what the outcome would be? How do we move from here as a people? This is very interesting because I was reading online about government releasing the five people they arrested on the case of Sylvester. And just like that, by February, I'm sure the school will reopen back. Nothing happened. Let's keep moving. Nobody told accountable. And thanks to the government. The government has struck again. So I'm not encouraging violence. Just to be clear. Just to be clear. But we, I think, in our issues by ourselves, it has actually been more effective than the government for us. Like the Sylvester case, you killed someone's child. Someone has to be accountable. If the government won't help me and my community people, we'll help. Me and my God and everybody will help. We'll get to the bottom of this case. We'll find the person responsible. Someone will pay for this crime. But if we keep going to the government or still relying on the government that has filled us back to back on the promises, on the primary things that they are supposed to provide, they filled us on those things. And now we want to rely on them to give us justice. It's like a joke. They can't give us justice. We are even fighting them to get freedom from these people. That's where the case came from. So why are we going to the same people for justice? Do you see this Sylvester case? I am very passionate about it because I have younger brothers. I am very passionate about that case and I don't want to go into it and then incite violence or something like you should pay people to do. I don't want to go into it but on that case, in that situation, I am sorry myself and my family members will take matters into our own hands. Government has released these people. They have done whatever they want to do but that school won't reopen until I count people. If it were me and my family but I'm not going to incite any violence and I'm not going to preach like go for yourself, ignore what the government says. You know, Victor, I've always come from this point and this is why we always, let me copy our vice president why we are, where we are, where we are, whichever. But the truth is, like with the answers, same mistake. And I'll tell you what the mistake is. It's very simple. You cannot hold a government accountable when you don't understand how governance works. First. Second, you cannot hold a government that does not understand this job as government accountable when they don't understand what they are doing. That's the second. And as long as those two prevailing factors keep occurring, I'll give you an example. You have, let's say, there should be a senator covering that jurisdiction. I don't want to ask who the senator is. I know the senator. But I'm not going to ask who the senator is. Okay. Senator is legislatively responsible for the kind of laws that are within that place. So now, let's say your senator has served give or take for ten years in the senate at the cost of over two billion and in a last saloon and proposed bills is zero and you people think the senator should remain because the senator has been there. How do you now want to get the kind of laws that will enable that when issues like this that happen in Darwin College happen, someone is held by the law? Do you understand? It's related. So as long as that keeps happening and you people are saying, ah, go, or that funny actor that is in legal state out of assembly. Who I would refuse to name. Oh my God. But how many bills has he proposed? He's talking about executive functions and the bridge. As long as those people do not provide the relevant laws for the country to function the failure of the country will continue being evident. You're pointing at governors and presidents. Trust me, we are supposed to be pointing at the legislature. Thank you. Elijah, what do you have to say about this? This is what I'm saying is that I'm tired of all this. So what I'm saying is first things first, you cannot take laws into your hands because we have a government. So no matter how hungry you are as a citizen, that's just a law. You can't take laws into your hands. We still have to hold the government responsible. Then secondly, during your conversation earlier you talked about the government having restructuring something else. So we know we have most times you see the government acting as a jury witness and a judge in Zomata. How can the Ministry of Justice be independent of the government? I said as long as the president appoints the attorney general the attorney general is the minister of justice. It's not supposed to be. The attorney general is supposed to be on his own. Your job is to advocate for the presidency, right? That's the minister of justice. The attorney general? No, the attorney general is to uphold law. No. That office is supposed to be independent. But one person is at the boot. It's like complete of interest. And then you cannot have we just have to have an independent justice system to see through things like this. To who government account it. But how can you even have an independent justice system when your police is inside the Ministry of Interior instead of on-demand? Department of Justice. Department of Justice is some claim. This on-series when Fashla went to do the investigation after I answered. They let you talk. Yeah, picking up the camera. That is so... You went to government. This government is, oh my God. But I still think we have to keep holding the government responsibility no matter what you do. You cannot take laws into your hand. What I will appeal to the parents of those victims is keep going to courts, keep dragging them. One day justice will be served. That's just the truth. Yeah, and I get that. But when you say one day justice will be served. It's not 5 years. It's not 10 years. It could be tomorrow. Only if... Right. When they change everything. When the old system changes. They should just keep pushing. They can't take the laws into their hands. So that's it. Alright. Ubuntu poses, I am because we are. Anything that happens to one of us happens to all of us. So it's important that we collectively come together and be a bit more intentional with how we follow up on these social issues. Elijah is next after the break. To stay with us.