 Okay, my name is Siobhan McCafferty and I'm the Research Data Coordinator for NANUP, which is the National Agricultural Nitrous Oxide Research Program. NANUP is the most recent iteration of a National Nitrous Oxide and Gas Emissions Research Program, hence the name, and this program brings together researchers from at least 10 Australian universities and six institutions and government. NANUP's coordinated from QUT in Brisbane and I'm part of a small team of two embedded in the Healthy Ecosystems and Environmental Monitoring Group, which is part of the Institute for Future Environments. My job covers all things data management, but the focus of it now is a service manager for the interway data repository and portal. For those who like technical information, the portal is our own version of a MetaCat repository, which is Java and Tomcat, developed by the Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity using the software's web server, a Postgres relational database management system, and an LDAP. Other features that were spliced on are a GeoServer software for mapping and a web interface which allows users to access and interact with the records. We also have an OAI-PMH Metadata Harvest to Research Data Australia and the system has an integrated DOI minting facility. Minting is providing by ANS using a nice little piece of software called Website Content Managed Using Jumler CMS, PHP, and my SQL as a database and I devolve the content for the website. I also advise on data and metadata standards, licensing and access, and encourage researchers to provide us with their data and metadata, either by self upload or via Morpho upload software integrated DOI minting facility and our minting services provided by ANS with a nifty little piece of software that we developed called DOI Monkey. Website contents managed with Jumler, PHP, and my SQL as a database, so there's a whole lot of stuff going on in the background that's taken care of by our wonderful developer Moises. I also advise on data and metadata standards, licensing and access and I encourage researchers to provide us with their data and metadata either by self upload via Morpho or with my help. I spend a fair amount of time talking to researchers about what they need, how to get their data where it's meant to be, and how to make it useful for other people, and how did I get where I am now. Like many librarians, this is not my first career. My academic background was in philosophy and religious studies and I began my studies in Wellington, New Zealand at Victoria and I continued at Sterling and over at the University of Glasgow. I've got lots of years teaching at universities and working in libraries to support myself while I tried to develop an academic career. So consequently I had a nice collection of soft skills and technical experience. So when the GFC hit Europe and jobs in the humanities became scarce, I moved to countries and I began training to be an archivist which eventually became a study for masters in information management at ECU and led to my current incarnation. While I was nearing the end of my studies, I took on a short-term contract with a new e-research team based at the Institute for Sustainable Resources at QUT. That team was externally funded by project work and our bread and butter was repositories and data portals for scientific research and developing scientific software and applications. I was also involved then in a few ANS projects and also with the turn data portal which Michelle was working on. So I got to know a few people. In 2012, I started Spandid and became the Institute for Future Environments at QUT and I was absorbed into the heme, so absorbed back into the bloodstream of the institute and for the remaining duration of the NANORP program, I was there data library and or research data coordinator. The main challenges of my work will be familiar to everyone. The first one is working in an emergent sector. Data librarians and information specialists don't fit in traditional boxes and it's often difficult for employers and funders to see why and where you fit and that can make writing proposal costings difficult. So when projects come up that will need my work, it's often been difficult to say why they need my work. I was very lucky to work in an overarching project that was willing to take on new technologies and try and develop them. But sometimes your funders don't really understand that, which brings us to funding. NANORP researchers work with gas emissions and climate change and they're not very favored areas of funding at the moment unfortunately. There's also been a lot of cuts to long-term research funding which has put a serious squeeze on research and made it necessary for us to curtail sun schemes and change the scope of others. It's also meant I've need to expand my role to fill the gaps where other members of staff may have been, which I think has been quite positive actually. Most of our projects are short-term and run on a skeleton staff now and funding will also unfortunately endanger the future of my portal. So it's possible that we're going to lose this internationally important collection. To counter this we've changed some of our practices and descriptions of our aims for example instead of our research looking at farming practices and man-made gas emissions we talk about increasing yields for low fertilizer usage. We try and make what we're doing very focused towards farmer needs, agricultural needs and working with industry to provide solutions rather than a purely academic kind of climate modeling focus. The other challenge has been culture change. Soil science is a very traditional area or has been and being part of an emergent sector working in an interdisciplinary way with a traditional area has been very challenging but also a lot of fun. So research in general as well as traditionally been an area where sitting on your data and keeping it secure and secret was necessary and the way to get ahead in your academic career was to have exclusive data to write about and the more exclusive and more secret the data the better. Working to spread the idea that sharing data was the way forward and even more so. Open data was the way forward it's been very difficult so I've employed carrot and stick methods so we have a really useful big stick which is our researchers get funding for supplying us with their data. It's built into their contracts so no data no funding but I don't want to use the stick all the time I prefer the carrot and I want to really make research as aware of the benefits of making the data open and putting it into a repository such as ours and putting DOI on things linking things up it's going to be beneficial particularly to early career researchers because they're the guys that are going to drive this. So making open data and data sharing work for my researchers has been key we've got really tight licensing and attribution controls so they can see their data is protected and we make sure to broadcast any good use of our data. Someone uses it in an article and make sure everyone in the network knows about it. Something gets published everyone knows about it. Yeah we make sure to broadcast all the good press and make researchers aware that they can use other open data as well to augment their own so kind of spread the good news. How do I manage without supporting confines of a library? I was really lucky when I picked up that first contract I had a great mentor and friend as my manager and he helped walk me through a lot of things and that I needed to know. It was a massive learning curve and it was really daunting to walk into Fresh from Study as well and changing sectors but I was invited to every meeting going every workshop and every product presentation whether I really needed to be there or not for a while so I was made aware of the complexity of data and metadata management and encouraged to read and explore current issues in the area and slowly I built a very practical picture of data librarianship as it applied to me maybe not as broad as other people but certainly I learned what I needed to know. I also had a team that was willing when it had the funding to take the risk on an emergent area and sent me to get training as the need arose and made sure I could attend workshops. If I asked to go to something 99% of the time yes no problem how can we help which was wonderful. I also have an excellent relationship with the library. I'm sitting in it right now I actually work here two days a week at the moment and I've worked with them as much as possible towards common goals and they've really included me and others like me in the university in their planning. We consult relevant aspects of both our domains we go to a lot of the same meetings. I've also got a strong project team we've in the past been larger but now there's two of us and my developer is a great guy really knowledgeable willing to sit down and explain things to me he is endless patience and likewise anything that he needed to know I sat down talk to him through it as well. The last thing would be because I'm part of the university I am subject to staff development so even though I'm not not really within the university DUD librarian group when I'm working for IFE but I can still get access to the same training for example project management training I was able to attend that and last on the screen there was willingness to ask for help I was really lucky during some of our projects that everyone was in the same boat we were developing things from scratch we were making new exciting products and I could ask what are you doing how are you doing it I'd ask guys at Ann's QUT the guy in the coffee shop I asked everyone their opinions how do I develop my skills I think I kind of covered that there I just went to everything going I've maybe got a real eclectic collection of qualifications and skills because of that every time I needed to upskill I had the opportunity or I could seek out the opportunity and was supported so what advice would I give to others who are thinking of moving into a role such as yours first of all I've said this before being advocate for your users front end and back end they're the people that create and consume the data and the metadata they're an ultimate audience and if the product doesn't suit them then it won't get used no matter how pretty it is or how much work you've put in nobody will want it so ask your research is what they need and be prepared to negotiate and make concessions from your ideals about data management to make sure that they get that be flexible having an open and flexible attitude invites open and flexible dialogue if a researcher is having problems with the software and everyone does it's not the easiest thing to use then I'll try and find the best way to help them some people like emails some people like online help some people like to be visited if they have firewall problems I will upload their data sets even though I encourage them very strongly to do it themselves if they break the internet I will fly to help them even if they're in Western Australia I will be there keep high standards because data repositories are evolving and it's an emergent area it's easy for people who are newly in contact with data librarianship to say oh that'll do you know it looks good fine but in keeping to agree best practice and industry standard and being seen to do so you convey the importance of data management and storage and you find that people will rise to your standards as well especially when you can couple that with a willingness to be flexible in your approach and to help your contributors you'll hopefully end up with an excellent product for the end for example I have researchers who are very very busy I say I know you're busy but we really need all those metadata fields here's a pre-filled and word document with what I already have you just need to have technical details get it back to me get it up that way everyone reaches their deadlines you know milestones are met and everyone's happy and that's me thank you very much everyone any questions how do we attract people to data librarianship when it's largely unknown misunderstood field go and go and talk at them about it and how wonderful it is attract people to come and beat other librarians really go for me go to different academic streams go to different disciplines and talk to people about how they can apply what they know because a lot of the time you know we develop these collection of skills and there's not all the jobs there in academia or in industry and people who know a little bit about an area can learn a lot about another thing put them together and suddenly the great data librarians how to make it attractive I don't know maybe yeah we just talk to them a lot more be more present don't hide in cupboards like I'm doing at the moment here we've got another one that comes in that says are there traditional librarian skills that give a pathway into data librarianship sure cataloging I learned a whole lot when I was doing my paper on cataloging that I directly apply all the time but I'm maybe not the best person to ask because I'm not a very traditional librarian and I purposefully negotiated my way through my qualifications so I didn't need to do very traditional librarian things I think all of the skills that we develop in traditional librarianship are applicable especially the people skills interview techniques all of them you mentioned you attended as many conferences etc to learn how did you convince management to fund this as I quite pretend anything as there is no not money yeah when that when we had funding early in the projects that was a lot easier I will admit that but I also do fund myself in some situations so well they'll partially fund me or I will pay for something and agree that I can have the time during work to go to it so some of it is negotiation time because of funding issues fantastic thank you everyone