 limits and goals of a theory of social conflict. So, to understand the limits and goals firstly we have to observe what are the major objectives of the conflict. So, the basic intent of social conflict theory is to make contribution to understand social process and moreover for comprehensive sociological analysis categories and types of conflict are required and cannot be excluded from analysis. So, the purpose of our sociological theory of conflict is to overcome the predominatory, arbitrary nature of unexplained historical events by deriving these events from social structural elements and in other words to explain certain processes by highlighting their reasons, their logics behind the various social conflicts. And it is quite important to describe the conflict between workers and employers but most important is to produce a proof that such a conflict is based on certain social structural arrangements. So, this is basically the task of sociology to derive conflict from specific social structures and not to neglect these conflicts to psychological variables and not to keep the historical reasons or logics but it is the responsibility of the political sociologist to highlight the major aims and objectives of all the social conflicts. So, the basic responsibility of the social conflicts is to understand the reasons behind the political sociologist because if the social conflicts in the world evaluate the objectives, goals and reasons behind the social conflicts, then to stop them, there is a philosophy or a mechanism required to create them or to suggest them in a position. So, what are the major limitations regarding the theory of social conflict? Because the social conflict theory is limited to certain environments. Why it is limited and why there are certain limitations on this theory? Because various environments, they have their specific characteristics and various environments have their sets of challenges. Because the first challenge is to explain to the social class that the relationship between the social class and the social class varies from the social class to the social class. So, the social class varies from the social class to the social class. So, the relationship between the social class varies from society to society and in that environment, the existing various social classes, how they operate with each other? So, we can say that it is quite difficult to bring that concept into one dynamic, as there are a variety of links and there are a variety of apparatus all over the world regarding this social conflict theory and while discussing the limitations on this proper method. Because there are deviant within the social classes and because they all have the power struggle among these social classes, now every class wants that it has a dominating position and when every class struggles for a dominating position, then their clash will increase and who has the ability to control that clash? Who has the ability to control the clashes between the classes? Who will be the next one to introduce such a mechanism in every place in the world? This irony is present that the clashes between the classes, because of which all these systems are faced with a lot of challenges and there are a lot of problems that arise. The conflict theory challenges the status quo and firmly believes that the elite class is responsible for enforcing social order on those who are the lesser ones. So, the privileged class or the class which is the elite class of any society. If the elite class has more power, then it is their responsibility to manage the conditions of the society in some way and to facilitate the society to settle down the issues and the hard realities. So, we can say that the humanitarian efforts can be done on the basis of civil rights movements, but also on the basis of democracy and freedom of thought, freedom of action, people can think, people can talk, people can make organizations for themselves, they can give their own agendas. So, this is all a collective environment. If humanitarian efforts are involved and other classes are co-operated, then the social conflict situation can be managed and controlled. There are a lot of existing examples in the world that even in the world there are revolutions, there are a lot of social movements in the world. And what was the purpose of all of this? That somehow through the efforts by the individuals, those can be the rulers, those can be some philosophers or sometimes in efforts by the organizations or sometimes by the structural organizations or by the civil society. They can help it out to manage the existing conflict or to manage the existing environment that any conflict, social conflict, cannot be created and if it is created, then it can be handled in some way.