 Well, I think like most people, certainly if we went back 10 or 15 years ago who worked on wealth, I was focused on my own country and a few others. And the countries that were easy to study were essentially Europe, North America, Japan. And people in my area of the discipline had done careful studies comparing Sweden with the United States, France with the United States, these kinds of things. But people weren't thinking globally. And the impact of wider was that wider does think globally and it reaches out. And so I was, you know, wider reached out to me and I, you know, was brought over. And we just began to think about why are we not thinking about distribution of wealth globally. Why are we just thinking about our own backyard, you know? And so from there, that's how things developed. Like you say, the repertoire changed completely, you know? And what we discovered was that there was a lot going on in other parts of the world. In India, every 10 years since the 1950s, they've been running a mammoth survey. They wrote in the interview about 100,000 households and found out all about their assets and their debts as well as their income. And in China, they've been doing it from the early 1990s, every five or seven years, very serious interest in this area. And for whatever reason, you know, people in the developed world really didn't know what people in those areas were doing. And there was great synergy from bringing it all together. We had a project at wider where we brought researchers together from all over the world and began to compare and build up an understanding on a global level of what was happening in terms of personal assets. I think, you know, there are many things going on and this has been increasing public interest in issues of inequality in governments and so on. But part of the reason that there's been this increasing interest is because of what the researchers are doing and wider has been a pioneering organization in terms of bringing people together to, you know, work on these aspects, right? The Nobel Prize winner, Martia Sen, did some of his most significant work on inequality 30 years ago when he was in residence at Wider and the tradition has gone on from there. And Wider is a very special organization because unlike other major international economics research organizations, say the World Bank of the IMF, which do excellent research, Wider is a different model. It has a relatively small permanent staff. And what it does is it brings in researchers from around the world and engages them intensively on research projects. And it's a very productive model. The publications of the institute are very impressive relative to the size of the institute. It's had a really big impact. Well, you know, we're appreciating more and more that well-being is a multi-dimensional thing, you know, and of course in the work of Sen from the beginning he's emphasized the importance of what he calls functionings and the abilities people have and the freedom they have to actually do things in their lives. And this is, as we say, multi-dimensional. Wealth is one of these dimensions. And people's ability to achieve the things that they want to do in life is greatly enhanced by personal wealth. So I think it's part of the picture, and we're broadening our understanding. We've always looked at income, consumption, so research is my area of saying let's look at wealth as well and try to integrate these two things, get an overall picture of these kind of strictly economic dimensions, but then also, you know, at the same time be aware of the need to look at education, health, the environment, these other aspects and, you know, bring them into the picture as well.