 Well, the Canadian legal battle involves primarily Meng Wanzhou or should I say only Meng Wanzhou, whereas the US battle involves Huawei as a corporation and few other corporations and companies as well. Meng Wanzhou, deputy chairwoman of the board and chief financial officer of China's largest private company was arrested last year in Canada in December to be precise on 1st December when she was in transit at Vancouver International Airport, traveling from Hong Kong to Mexico. She was taken into custody at the request of the United States for allegedly defrauding multiple financial institutions in breach of US imposed bans on dealing with Iran. It has been revealed that an arrest warrant was issued earlier in August 2018 by the United States District Court for the Eastern District in New York based on allegations of conspiracy to dupe and defraud banks which had cleared money that was claimed to be for Huawei, but actually it was for Skycom, the entity claimed to be controlled by Huawei itself, which is said to be in breach of the sanctions with regard to Iran. Sources also disclose that the bank which was involved in these dealings was HSBC. Obviously, US wants Wanzhou to stand trial with regard to several charges in principle, those linked with alleged violation of sanctions regarding Iran. In December last year, Meng Wanzhou was granted bail by the Vancouver Court on furnishing of a bail bond of Canadian dollar 10 million and several other strict conditions including electronic surveillance. It was also mandated by the court that she should surrender all her passports and there are seven passports which have been recorded in the court proceedings which she has surrendered and there is one additional passport which she had, which is an official passport which is normally issued to the employees of the Chinese government who travel overseas with regard to matters pertaining to public affairs. Under Canada's extradition act, the cut off date for the US to apply for extradition was 30th January 2019, meaning 60 days from the date of her arrest. On 28th January, US released a summary of an indictment filed earlier against Meng personally as well as three other corporations including Huawei and at least one other person. Meng was charged with bank fraud, wire fraud and conspiracies to commit fraud with regard to sanctions against Iran. The government also proclaimed a different indictment against Huawei with regard to trade theft etc. The Department of Justice in Canada has issued a directive with regard to commencement of the extradition proceedings which have formally commenced. Well, there are almost two dozen charges which have been filed by the US authorities against Huawei and Meng. Legally, an extradition hearing is not a trial, it's not a criminal trial or a civil trial nor does it pronounce a ruling of guilt or innocence. If the court in Canada is convinced with regard to evidence presented to it during the extradition proceedings hearing, it can sanction an individual to be served for extradition and once that is done then the Canadian government will take a final call based on that judgment whether to surrender that person to the US authorities or not. Meng actually in the meantime has filed a lawsuit at the Canadian court against the Royal Canada Mounted Police and the Canadian Border Service Agency with regard to wrongful interrogation by their agents. Meng claims that she was illegally, unlawfully detained, searched and interrogated by the agents of CBSA which is the Canadian Border and Service Agency. Even so far as extradition proceedings are concerned, the next court appearance is scheduled for 8th May 2019 as I recollect reading one of the news clippings. This legal battle has turned out to be a battle between giants with a battery of lawyers appearing from both the sides. The complications, confusion and delays are the three key words which I foresee and which will supersede I think merits of the case in days to come and it is only time which will sort of establish and demonstrate and stand as an evidence as to which side gets the blow by the whip in times to come.