 It's interesting, Hisham, when you listed all those different actors, it makes me think of the role of the Arab states in this particularly in light of the Abraham Accords and Israeli Arab state normalization agreements that we saw this starting last August. It's interesting to think about the role that those might play. Does this change anything to your mind? I know that going back on the first question we were discussing of the paradigm of two states and is it still alive and well? There's been a lot of commentary since the signing of those normalization agreements of the Arab peace initiative being dead. That taboo being set aside or rather that idea that was set forth in the Arab peace initiative or Saudi initiative initially that there could be no peace between the Arab states and Israel until there was an agreement signed between the Israelis and Palestinians that gave the Palestinians a state. And I think too much has been made in the analysis of that paradigm being dead. Obviously the sequencing is dead. These Arab states have decided to make this with Israel without waiting for a Palestinian state to come into being. But these states to my ears, what I hear is still very much insisting on the ambition and goal set out in the Arab peace initiative of two states. Do you see the Arab states at this point, certainly the new normalizers, so you've got the UAE and Bahrain, you've got Sudan and Morocco. Do you see them either individually or in concert with each other in Egypt and Jordan, making any efforts to make progress on the Israeli Palestinian conflict? You mentioned several points and I think they are important. I think the Arab peace initiative is still important because the Arab peace initiative identifies a number of elements in relation to the final settlement. How does the Arab world view the final settlement in relation to resolving the Israeli Palestinian conflict? This remains the same. But as you mentioned, the part about normalization, when and how to have the normalization reached. I think now we are moving in a phase whereby this normalization can be done in stages. And this is one of the complaints that Israel had on the Arab peace initiative that it is back loaded. So there are ideas now to see how we can have normalization in stages, like we're going to have peace in stages, because peace will not be established between a day and a night. It will take time. And normalization will also take time. Even normalization between Jordan and Israel and Egypt and Israel is still until now taking its time. So we have to see how this evolves. And I think it's a good idea to see how we can synchronize some form of advancement on normalization while we are having advancement on peace. So this is, I think, how we can try to see how this can be advanced.