 Welcome to the February question and answers wiki tree for new members. So the question was how to add Quaker project and Quaker sticker. And so it turns out it's not a category. It's a template and Pamela, do you have the wiki tree browser extension installed? I do. OK, so let me back up here and show you how you get there. So I'm editing my own profile and you can see here templates, categories, biography, you see all that? Yes. And do you have this part enabled in your browser extension? I I'm not sure. OK, so so this is this is something that comes in the browser extension. And if you don't have this enabled, you can tell tell me a little bit later and I'll go look through the browser extension to see which option it is you need to enable. But basically you get this mini menu in here and you so you select add any template and then you start typing in Quaker so you can add the Quaker project. So let's select that. And it's going to ask whether there's any needs and it doesn't have any needs. So you're just saying Quaker's project. OK, so I so I think that's not the one that you want. Let's get rid of that. And we'll add any template again. Quaker. Now, this is quick. This is the Quaker sticker. We're going to select that. And it wants to know. I don't know what it wants in the ad info or living because I'm not familiar with this template. It goes to nowhere. Sorry, I was going to say click the question mark that might tell you what that field is. No, it's not activating. No, so living once yes or no. So is the person living or not? And it seems to not want the location. So we're going to say, well, in my case, I am living. So, OK. So we're going to add that. And so there's the Quaker sticker. And now if I do a preview, where did it add the Quaker sticker? The top somewhere. Very top. Oh, right there. But it put it right at the top now. So if I wanted it to be. Where it really belongs. I would move down here and put it just below the biography. And then I'll preview that again. I love the previews. And there it is right right right below the biography heading. OK, so is that the one you were looking for? That is the sticker. And but I was wondering, how do you how do you see the project, the Quakers project? OK, let's go. Let's go figure that out. So let me get out of here. So when you've made changes that you don't want. You go to delete draft and return to profile without saving. Love that one. So the draft has been deleted and there's nothing there. So now you want to find the Quaker project. So what I need to do is. Get that out of my way. And we're going to find a project. Where are the projects there? There's projects there. Find projects. And they should be there. Just going to do a search. Probably under United States. No, because there's Quakers religion across the world. There's Quakers in England and Wales. Oh, OK, just a minute. So what? Go to religion, Quaker friends. And there's a Quakers project within that. OK, get the URL for that. And we will go to the chat. And there you go. There is the URL for the Quaker project. OK, thank you. You're welcome there. And now. I can stop sharing. And the other way, of course, is if you don't know how to get to it through the projects page, you can go to search and you can type in Quaker project Quakers project. It should pull it up as one of the first options, because again, it's using a Google search externally to look at all of our pages that way. So that's an alternative way you can pull it up. OK, then maybe quicker for you. Did you have another question, Hamela? Let's see. I'll say, as I said, I've been listening to some of the Saturday roundups and often they say the word biscuits. And I can't figure out why they're saying biscuits. Could somebody please tell me why? So. So apparently, biscuits are very popular among Appalachians. And I guess they're a reward of something. So apparently, biscuits is an exclamation of Appalachians. And I guess unless you're an Appalachian, you don't really get it. But that's my understanding of things. Biscuits are a reward. Biscuits are a good thing. People are happy to get biscuits. But beyond that, I really don't know. You'd have to ask an Appalachian. And I think that would be a question to raise on the Saturday roundup. And Mags will be quite expansive in answering you. OK, thank you. Yeah. And my last question has to do with the profile improvement project. I signed up for the voyage in January. And I was wondering how long it takes to, you know, generally get your mentor in that project. I don't know. I'm not part of that. I don't know if either of you, either Steve or Murray, are part of that one. I'm part I'm one of the project coordinators for the England Project orphan trail. And I know we have quite a long waiting list on ours. And I don't know how many mentors they have on the voyage. But I suspect like we have in the England Project, you there is probably a waiting time. The best thing to do would be you probably if you've joined, you probably contacted somebody is to contact whoever you you caught, whoever it was that you signed you up to go do the voyage. Contact them. But don't be surprised if you have a little bit of a wait, because there's only a few there's only a certain number of people that are able to do the men to be the mentors. And obviously they, you know, if they've got somebody that is needing a lot of help, then it's going to be slower progress before they can take on another person. So, yeah, OK. All right. Thank you. Yeah, that's all my questions. Right. Does anybody else have any questions? I would like you to look at a couple of profiles if you have time, please. Yeah, have you got the profile IDs? It's Bartlett, eight seven five one. Bart, Bartlett. Yes, B, A, R, T, L, E, two, T. Seven. What was the number again? Eight seven five one. Eight seven five one. Very missed that. Bartlett, eight seven five one. Bartlett, I think it's all right. I thought it in, but I didn't miss it. T, T, T, I'm not finding anything. I've got it. I've got it. I think Lucianne Bartlett Stone. Yes, that's correct. That's it. Right. I'll screen share then and we can and then we can. See. I did some. I did some work on that recently. And unfortunately, I duplicated another profile. I thought I was being careful, but I missed it. And somehow, as I entered the information on her profile, I had, I had created two profiles for the same person. I have no idea how I did that. But it was obvious that they needed to be merged. And when I did that, the original profile went away. I didn't lose the information that was on it because I had copied it. But unfortunately, the, the profile manager's name went away and I became the profile manager. And this particular case, the original profile manager is now deceased. But I was uncomfortable about that because that was, that was not my intent. And I'm not sure how or what I did to cause the original information to go away. Any ideas? Yeah, I suspect with with when you merge profiles, if you got, if you got a duplicate and when it, when you do, when you press to merge, you usually merge into the original profile, the lower numbered one. And I suspect you had it the other way around. But if that other profile manager was deceased and therefore they didn't have a perhaps, it perhaps been orphaned and they didn't have a profile manager after all, that they possibly just automatically went through. That's my, that's my thought, unless Murray or Steve's got any other ideas. Well, I'm looking at the, I'm looking at the change log. So I can see that I can see the information that got lost. And I've copied it. And how, how or where do you see that? Oh, I see. So you want to change the changes and track it that way? Yeah, this is the changes. So if you click on the changes button, you'll see what, see what's changed on the profile at the various times and who's changed it. And you can go to each like, so this person edited the biography at that time. So if I click there, it, it then shows me what was changed. Well, all it was changed at that time was they added a category on, but sometimes they can add a lot more than that. Where's the merge? Let's have a look. Let's go back to her. Yeah, when did the merge happen? Oops. Oops. Got to the wrong. How long ago was the merge Barbara? I'm not sure. I've, my, my merge. I'll say maybe doesn't look like go, go down a little bit. It was 10 February. OK, that sounds right. That sounds right. And, and my, my formatting was not good. And I knew that. But OK, that's what I'm talking about. Shirley Dalton was the creator and was the original profile manager. But she's she's now gone. So I guess it's OK that I'm the current profile manager. And, and she is a relative. She's a descendant of one of my direct ancestors. But, but I didn't intend to do that. I, my, my work was much more recent than 2018 and and when I did the merge, it did go back to the first profile number. But I didn't expect that that Shirley Dalton as the profile manager would would disappear or that some of the information that she had included would disappear. And I don't know what I did to cause that. But the good thing is as a wiki, we can go back to this data and we can see exactly what was changed or removed. So if we want to add it back in, we could possibly still do that because we can see the original. Yeah, because I can show that this is how it was created. That was originally created there. So if there's anything that's not on the profile now that was that was on there before that you want to keep, then you can go back and you can just copy that bit and put it put it back into the profile. You might have changed something else that you don't want to change. So you could just copy out what what what there is on there. That's how that's how the profile was originally set up. All right, OK. And it's going to happen. People will pass away. Their profiles will fall either into being orphans or someone else will pick up after them. So it's just the natural water of being on a long project like this that people are not going to be around. So someone else will fill in after they are they're gone. OK, OK. So you think it's because surely Galton must have ceased that my name came up that I can't control. She can't control a profile if she's deceased because she can't respond to messages because she can't do anything. So she is now with the rest of the deceased profiles. Except except that. I was surprised that that happened and I didn't know why or what I had done. It's not a common situation. Yeah, OK, OK. And because. The profile as I had shown that the formatting was was not good, but I didn't know how to fix it. And somebody fixed it, but I don't know what they did to to make it right. So I. When when when that happens. I can see what somebody has done. But I don't know the process to fix what I had done and correctly and formatting. And again, those are things that could be visualized in the changes log. But it's probably wiki markup that was used to do the formatting or the arrangement of things on the profile. So it does have a little bit of a steeper learning curve. If you're not familiar with that type of markup language. But I mean, always ask for help because a lot of us has been doing this for a long time. And, you know, that's that's what the whole point of the community is, is that you don't have to do everything yourself. It's collaborative. Right. So I want to learn to do it correctly. But if I if I don't know what's been done to correct it. Right. I could share a link to Betsy has a page for wiki markup. So those are the things that we use the bold and underline and create links. So I can go and find that right now and share that in the chat. When we were already have access to it. When we finish, maybe you want to go back to the and have a look at that profile and look at the changes and have a look, see what the differences are between when you left it and what other people have done since that might help you to understand what was what was not quite right on the profile. OK, so if I go back to my change, it will still show me. How it looked at that time. I guess I don't realize that. Yeah, if you go back to the if you go to that profile, click on the changes and it will show you any change that's being made and say it will show you what's happened and what's different from the previously prior to that change being made so you can see if something's been removed or something's been altered on the profile, it will show you that what alterations have been made. OK, can can you show them side by side somehow? I'll show you. I'll show you I'll go I'll share again because I've still got it on my screen. I'll share that screen and show you what I mean. Thank you. You're now seeing fine. Right, so I've gone to the changes button, which is gone yellow. And so the last time that you made any edit was on was this one. So after that, somebody else edited the biography. They've said they added some categories. So if I click on edited the biography, you'll be able to see that was when the last edit is it on the 10th of February. That's how it was. They've added above the biography, they added category, Highland Cemetery, Newcastle, Colorado, and that's the first thing they did. Then the next change after that. We'll show that another category was added and and two one name studies were added for the surnames of Bartlett and Stone, which are which are the surnames on her profile. And otherwise there. They seem to be pretty much the same. Everything else was the same as what it had been. Then then then if you click the next change, it will show you that. All right, OK. Somebody's put in some reference tags there, but they haven't put anything in between the reference tags. They've put some research notes in and that's been added. I I did the research notes. Yeah, yeah. And this was put this research notes was put on there. I did that. Yeah, it's just it's just been moved. So you've got actually got a research notes section there. Which should be two equals, fine, not three. A research note. And it looked like three equal signs for research notes. Is that right? It it that's what it is there, but it should be two. Yeah, yeah. I just share it. Yeah. Yeah, it usually comes up and warns you if you've got the browser. I think it's a browser extension. If you've got that on, it usually comes up and warns you in the big yellow box. If you've got the wrong some of the wrong the format in all. It was it was if it if it's got three, three equal signs either side, that means it's a subsection and sometimes it will say it's a subsection when it should be a section, which is just the two equal signs either side. And sometimes I understand what they're telling me when they when they say it's an error. I know it's near her, but but I'm not sure what to do to fix it sometimes. Yeah, so I just share a link. Betsy has a subpage that says useful tips for wiki code. That's what she's calling wiki markup and also site sort of this sort. Sorry, citing sources. So if you go ahead and click on that, that might break down some of the things that you're encountering and you can understand what they do like. So that's that's kind of a cheat sheet that we have available. That also links off of the the Q&A page that you would have clicked the link on to get here, so that that can be accessed through that. I just finally found it. Yeah, the next bit looked like somebody's actually collected the research notes and removed these two equal signs that shouldn't be there and they've made it into the correct with the correct formatting. Right, they made the same size as the biography section. Yeah, the biography section has two. And if you want to go smaller, then you go three, then you go four. Yeah. It's easy done to put the wrong one on. I've done that on a load of profiles and then I have to go back and amend them when I came across them again, so it's easy done. Just takes practice. Yeah, yeah. And then they've just added something into that bit there, which so all this bit that's highlighted in red looks like it's looks like it's just been added in whoever edited that one. Do you get added that? And that was the end of all the contributions on that one. So I'll stop sharing. But and again, if something was removed, it would have a strike for it, correct? Yeah, I think they I think if it's removed completely, you can tell that it's no longer in the biography. Does that help answer some questions for you, Barbara? Yes, thank you. And and then I have another profile that I would appreciate it if you could look at if you have time. Yeah, yeah. Have you got the ID? Barbara. It's Adams 6, 7, 6, 5, 8. Was that 6, 6, 5, 8? 6, 7, 6, 5, 8. David Albert Adams. Yes. OK. And I know. Yeah, I don't know. Even would you take that ID into the chat? Oh, yeah, no problem. Sorry, let's do that really quick. Where did my chat go? I lost it. Sometimes I don't even know how to use this program. That's great. No, don't do that. Oh, there it is. It's in more and that's what I was hiding. OK, so there is the link to Adams 6 or 6, 7, 6, 5, 8. Yes. It looks like a nice profile. And he's connected into the tree. Yes, I. I made a note on it on it yesterday. I changed his year of birth. And my explanation for for changing it was that I now have a. The pension application record from the National Archives for his father, James Adams. And on James affidavit and support of his pension application, he gave the birth dates of his children. And and so I relied on what James said rather than. Any other information we have and and. Is. Is that appropriate? Assuming that the the statement of a parent would be more likely to be correct than something on find a grave and they're already. And Betsy was was helping with that some time ago. And and which she pointed out that some of the information on find a grave could not be correct. And he isn't. And we and we found that and other instances where the information on find a grave is is not really correct. And what I cited was simply the pension application. By James Adams, the father, is that sufficient? It's a sufficient source. Do you have a link to the document in the National Archives? Or is it something that's physically held somewhere? Like, is there a digital version of it that we can link to? Well, maybe so. I have I have the copy of the of the pension application. Do you have it physically in your hand? Yes. OK. So that might be good to clarify is that you personally possess it. OK, as a source. So that that's better than just saying, you know, here's pension file. Where did it come from? OK, I I referenced the I didn't see the profile come up, but I referenced the I think I referenced the pension record numbers and referred to the National Archives. But I can add that I have that copy. Yeah, any additional information just to clarify that you are effectively the source for those because you have the document in your hand. The other thing about, you know, find a grave, it is not accurate for a lot of information. So I don't use it as a source unless I'm referencing the burial location because the burial location is something that can be verified. But if you're talking about birth, death, any of that stuff, a lot of those stones don't even tentatively are correct sometimes because it's a second hand person that provided the information when the person was deceased. So you want to go with a very fine grain of salt when you're dealing with find a grave, very, you know, taking with a very fine grain of salt. Because yeah, a lot of that data isn't sourced on their own site. Like they don't actually indicate what the sources are for the death dates and the birth dates that they put on there. So you use them as breadcrumbs or cookie crumbs. We can see from this find a grave one that it's totally wrong because they put in 1865 when the stone that they've got their photo of said that the person was born 1857, which is a completely different year. Way out. So it might not even be the person and the names different and everything. So you really do, as you say, Stephen, need to look at these things properly. I will only use a fine grain of salt. I know it's definitely and as you say, for the for the burial or I know that I I know that the person that's there is the is the same person, but usually I use it alongside of the references or in this case, it's in research notes because it's giving data that someone else might try to say is true. And we're basically telling them, no, it's not. And here are the reasons why. So we're trying to clean up the mess that's been taken for granted in other parts of the research world. They'll look at the fine grave and they'll assume it's correct. Right. And and Betsy had pointed out also and the information that that she included when we were looking at this profile previously, that David's date of birth buried slightly from the date of birth somewhere else for his twin sister. So and James is saying that that David and Alice were born March 1st, 1866 and that's that's I think that's probably at least as accurate as anything else that we have at this point. It's the most accurate source that you have. Yeah, it's probably recorded the closest to when the event happened as well. He's probably, you know, if it's only a few years after the children were born or or when they were still living with their with their parents. And his chances are they've got the right day. One of the things that I want to prevent happening again as duplicating a profile now. David Adams is the son of Nancy Shannon Bartlett Adams from her second marriage to James Adams. And on James Bartlett and Nancy's profile, children are listed on Nancy's profile. David and his siblings, at least one other sibling, are listed on Nancy's profile. James Adams has a profile. And his but the children are not listed. On James's profile and I I don't want to duplicate anything. So if I if I look at if if on David Adams's profile, if I click on father and then the option is new or existing and James Adams is an existing profile, yeah, then. When would that would that be what I want to accomplish? Yes, it is. Yeah, you just need his ID, which is which profile of the seven seven two seven. Yeah, if you're in Dave in the child's, if you get the ID of the father that you want to add and then go to add the father, that's all you need to match up with when it says it's got an existing profile is the ID of the existing profile. Because if you've got a few children to add, it's sometimes easier adding it from the child, the father from the child to make sure you've got them all. And and then for for the other siblings, there's there's one sibling. OK, here's here's David's profile. And there's there's one. Other sibling already listed the Nancy's profile. A couple other of her children with James Adams are not. So shall I go ahead and add him? There it is. Yeah, father. Would you like the father added, Barbara? Which James? Yes, James Adams is six seven seven two seven. Yes. Yeah. OK, so we're going to go ahead and add them. We're going to go ahead and add him, not Adam. Adam, Adam. Right. So now so now you have James Adam listed as the father of David Albert. Go ahead and click the ancestor button to this will be cool to visualize. Yes, and his his twin sister is Alice Adams. So she should be included, too. That was shown as one of the boys. I saw the person there in the list. Yeah, we'll go back. Alice is. Three, seven, four, three, nine. Oh, did it open up a new page? New tab. Oh, so that's the Alzera Alice. Yeah, yeah, yes. They're all coming up as half children. Yeah, that's because they've only got the mother attached rather than both parents, isn't it? Oh, she doesn't have a father. OK, just a second. Right. Her father is James Adams. Oh, there. Yes. And we will add it. And. Add father. Put it in the ID and connect to an existing profile. Go ahead. No, you grabbed hers instead. Oh, what do I what number do I want? James James is six, seven, seven, two, seven, six, seven, seven, two, seven. Yes. That's him. Yep. There we go. And I love that little preview that comes out. Yeah, unless you know that you've got the right one in there. There you go. She's connected to him now. And so for any of these other children that are saying half, if they're also James's children, you can do the same thing with them as we've done with David, Albert and Alice. Azira, add them on. And or Azira Alice, sorry. Add them on as some children of James, because they're probably all at the moment got just the mother attached. But if they're not all his children, if she's got she's had two husbands and some of one from one and some from another, then obviously you need to just make sure they've got the right father. Well, yeah, the ones with different names, the Bartlets would be a different father, then. Yes. The Bartlets are. Yeah, by James and they seem to be OK. And and then there are two more children for James Adams and Nancy Shannon. And so when I when I add those in order not to duplicate anything, where's the best place to to add them? You can add them to under as a child of one of the parents. And then the last few of the other parent is the the other connecting parent. You know, you can confirm it or you can say, no, it's not. It's actually somebody else when he gets that point. Do you have sorcerer Barbara? Oh, I love sorcerer. OK, so let me show you a trick with Sorcer. So if you go to Sorcer and you do search wiki tree from the profile that you're on. OK. It'll go and it'll look for everybody. That matches the name Elzira Adams. Oh, on that date and in fact, it's kind of weird. It didn't find anybody. So that didn't work as well as I was hoping. It doesn't always work. It didn't find Elzira Adams, who is the one that I searched off of. Which didn't look it. Yeah, it didn't find a duplicate. So yeah, that's that's kind of the point. It didn't find a duplicate. So, you know, so when when you're in the process of adding someone. You can, while you're in the add person screen, you can go up to your source or icon and have it search wiki tree. And it'll use all the data that you've entered and to form the search and it'll show you if you've got any any any comparable profiles. That'll happen naturally, too, without using Sorcer, right? Because if you give it information to creative person's profile, it'll then say, OK, well, here's some matches. Can you confirm that this is the person or, you know, because it'll actually point out, hey, same birth year, same deaf year. And I've had to like, had a couple of rejected matches because they were really close, so I had to select those. I like Sorcer better. Everybody has a different way of doing it. I know, I know. I like them both ways. Well, I try to be careful about not duplicating, but I made a mistake. We all do that. I had difficulty. We all do. You don't have to agree. Sometimes it's just not enough information there. And so you create a new one because you haven't got enough information. And then you come along later and you put some more information in it and you check and there's somebody else there. But sometimes it just depends how somebody's entered the information. And, you know, Barbara, it's funny how many people make duplicates. So, you know, I was doing some testing the other day and, you know, writing up about duplicates and stuff like that. And I found I was, you know, I just did a random search for Albert Einstein. And I found that somebody had created a duplicate for Albert Einstein. And how did they, how did they manage to do that? Like, how did it happen that they didn't think Albert Einstein was already in Wikitree, right? He should be Einstein one. He would have been the first Einstein created. I imagine. I can't remember now, but, but yeah, there was a duplicate. And it was like, well, this is weird, but, you know, it happens. It happens because people take sometimes create a profile from a census record and they'll just have a year. And then somebody else will come along and they'll have the information from the birth record, which might be a year or two different. And then so because it's not exactly. And maybe you haven't got enough information there, you'll create that. And then you'll realize later, oh, because they're connected to somebody else that that you've got a duplicate. So it does happen quite a lot. Or like me at midnight when I think that I haven't created this profile. And then I end up, you know, doing things twice because I don't have enough sleep. So don't drive in and Wikitree. Well, tired. Now, Barbara, back to the back to the question of merges. So let me make a suggestion to you when you do emerge. When you perform merge, it asks you near near the bottom of the form. It asks you whether you want to to have just the the text from the profile from one profile, just the text from the other profile or a merge of the two. And my recommendation, unless you know for sure that one profile is perfect, then the other one is is no good. You should always ask for a merge of the two. Now, another trick I'd like to suggest to you. You know, usually before I do a merge on an important profile, I will look at both the profiles, I'll do the comparisons, and then I will find I will go to the one that is the lowest number and I will make sure that it has all of the information that it should have so that when I do the merge, I just select the one that has the right information. OK, so if if you're not sure how you're going to edit it, then merge them and merge all the data into it and then go do a cleanup afterwards. If you know for sure, like you've spent some time and you've cleaned up the one profile and now you just want to get rid of the other one, then you can say merge these and select only the text from this one. Maybe maybe that was my mistake. Maybe I didn't click merge both of the two because actually at that point, I had three because I had accidentally and I'm not sure how I did that, but suddenly I realized that I had created two profiles for the same for for the same person. And and so when and it was about that point when I realized what I had done that suddenly the earlier profile showed up and then I had three. And and so. I I just I I didn't know what I was doing actually. That's OK because I got to look for it. Well, I have I have one other question and it's about James Bartlett and a Spartlet four, five, seven, one. And I am not the profile manager for James Bartlett, but I am a direct descendant and always until I recently received the pension application for James and Nancy Adams, Nancy being James Bartlett's first wife. We had always thought anybody who was researching James Bartlett had always thought that he probably died in 1863, Nancy's affidavits and support of her pension application for James Adams pension. Says that James died. She had there's a conflict. And one affidavit, she says it was January and in one, she says it was February. But in any event. It was 1862 and and Champaign County, Illinois. I've searched for many years to find some death record for James Bartlett without success. And this is the best information that I think we have now with Nancy's affidavit and what she says that her first husband died on these dates and in this place. I emailed Anita Riley, who is the profile manager and said that I have this new information and would like to change it, but she hasn't responded. And so my question now is that OK for me to simply go ahead and change the date and place of James Bartlett's death. And in my research notes say. Why I'm changing it and my source, which is the pension applications, it's I think because it's an open profile and you've got a source to indicate why you've changed something. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I mean, the the the profile manager has not been active for almost a year. So we don't know whether that profile manager is still is still around to if they've not responded to you. So it's not like it's it's as long as you've got a good source to go with it. And I don't see why you shouldn't edit one that's open like that. Well, I I think the the pension applications, which I just acquired recently, are probably the most reliable source that we have prior to that. The assumption was that he had died in 1863 because there were probate records for his children in 1864. And and so the assumption was he probably died the previous year. But Nancy says he died in 1862 when I and those are affidavits. And I think I think probably that's as close as we can get. Yes, it's the first hand at a station, right? You know, she will have she will have attested to that either on a particular day, which you've got on the affidavits, presumably. So yeah, you got all the evidence you reasonable to make that change. Yeah. And there was no response from the profile manager who has been inactive for over a year. It's an open profile, so you're welcome to add that. Of course, you know, go in the research notes and explain why you're making those changes as well, because it is an older profile of a lot of shared, you know, descendants. So then when other people come across in the future, they can see, you know, I had this document, I provided this information because, you know, X because of Y. And then there should not be an issue, you know, until another document surfaces, right? The dispels that one. Yeah, I mean, I worked on it on some profiles this week for a family which had all got mixed up on family search and they've been then being added to WikiTree. The same as what they were on family search, but they had the wrong parents on these things. And I had to do a lot of taking people off and put but I put all the sources and things on and I actually left a message for the profile manager and the profile manager got back to me and said, you know, you've got you've got more knowledge on this than me, than me. I'm pleased that you they were happy that I did it. In fact, they actually gave me a wonderful WikiTree for it. So because I've got all this family sorted out properly and they got lots of sources and things, but I'm more familiar with the area perhaps than that person is or I'm more familiar with no finding the sources. So but there's no reason why you shouldn't alter something that's an open profile if you've got the goods, if you've got sources to the changes, which you have. Because I'm fairly new, I don't want to do anything inappropriate. And so I did ask but but I think the information that from the pension records now, which has no information to me and years of searching have not turned up any other information about James Bartlett's death. Now, how about Ann and Doris? Have you guys got any or gals rather? Are you guys got any questions? I don't. I don't either. OK. Hopefully you've all found this useful. I always learn something new and I've been doing genealogy for over 30 years. So I don't consider myself a newbie. I learn new things every day myself. Yeah, I found those things that you don't know about that. I mean, I'm trying to do a load of wheels at the moment. And these are early wheels that I'm not familiar with. So but they give you so much information that, you know, it's worth learning. Right, yeah, I'm just learning. And plus I've been using all the YouTube's sources, which I love because because, like, I never knew about Sorcerer and I never knew about extension. And now it's fantastic. I love it. I love using Sorcerer. It's fantastic, especially using when I use a font, you know, like the Sprintcon and so forth. It's, you know, using it fantastic. I love it. And then when I learned that, like I said, like I said, like I went to a profile and I usually go to ancestry since I have it. And but most people don't have ancestry. So what I did was I just go into the list and I go straight to family search. And it's right there. Yeah, I love that. So I love the way it's of course. And I hope everyone enjoys their time at Roots Tick for any couple of days. I'll be virtual. Yeah, I'm not going this year. I've been twice. It was fun. No more questions. I'll stop recording. Thank you for all the help you've given me today. I appreciate it.