 Dwy dyma yn ei wneud i mi ddodolig i gweithio gyd y 13 o'r pwyllfa ar gael i Llywodraol Ffwrdd dros hynny. Apolygiau sydd ble fan hynny ihen am y Gweithwyr John Scott, ac yn ei gweithio ar gyfer an Ew Wells oeddechydig ni i ddiddordeb agos unrhyw yn ddodolig i John Scott. Efallag mae'n yn gweithio ar gyfer an Ew Wells i'r cyfnwys gyd ac mae enw Wells, a gyfo'r cymdeithas i chi'n ddod o feithio ar y Cynllunheiddiol, oherwydd niei flwyddorol o'r moedder. I have no relevant interests as committee and I refer people to my register of interests. Thank you very much. Agenda item number 2 is a consideration of instruments subject to the negative procedure. The first of these instruments is the Asset Transfer Request procedure, Scotland Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-357. The meaning of regulations 12 and 13 could be clearer in the following respects. Regulation 13-1 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that there may be one or more contact addresses determined in accordance with this regulation. Regulations 12 and 13 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that when a community transfer body sends an electronic communication from address other than a contact address or addresses contained in an asset transfer request or a subsequently notified in accordance with Regulation 13-2 that does not alter the contact address or addresses. On account of this lack of clarity, does the committee agree to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground H? Does the committee also agree to call on the Scottish Government to lay an amending instrument to improve the clarity of Regulations 12 and 13 for that amending instrument to take effect timurously for those regulations coming to force on 23 January 2017? Instrument number 2 is the Asset Transfer Request review procedure, Scotland Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-358. The meaning of the regulations could be made clearer in the following respects. Regulation 12-1 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that there is no requirement for the Scottish ministers to appoint a member of their own staff to a review panel. Secondly, review, SSI regulation 18-1 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that, when a community transfer body sends an electronic communication from an address other than a contact address or addresses contained in the application for review, or a subsequently notified in accordance with Regulation 18-2, that does not alter the contact address. Thirdly, review, SSI regulation 18-1 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that, when a community transfer body sends an electronic communication from an address other than a contact address, that does not alter the contact address or addresses. Does the committee agree to draw the instrument to the attention of Parliament on reporting around age on account of this lack of clarity? There is also a drafting error in Regulation 18-2. The reference to the Scottish ministers should be a reference to the relevant body. Does the committee agree to report the instrument under the general reporting ground too? The Scottish Government has undertaken to rectify Regulations 12-1 and 18-2 by laying an amending instrument. That would take effect timuously for those regulations coming to force on 23 January 2017. In light of the undertaking to lay an amending instrument, does the committee agree to call on the Scottish Government to include in that instrument provision to improve the clarity of Regulation 18-1 and Regulations 18-19 taken together? The third instrument is the asset transfer request appeals Scotland Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-359. Regulation 16-1 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that, when a community transfer body sends an electronic communication from an address other than a contact address or addresses contained in a notice of appeal or a subsequently notified an accordance with Regulation 16-2, that does not alter the contact address or addresses. Does the committee agree to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground H for lack of clarity for the aforementioned reasons? Does the committee also agree to call on the Scottish Government to lay an amending instrument which would improve the clarity of Regulations 16-17 and 18-19 taken together? Does the committee agree to call on the Scottish Government to lay an amending instrument which would improve the clarity of Regulations 16-17 and 18-19 taken together? Does the committee agree to call on the Scottish Government to lay an amending instrument to take effect timiously for the regulations coming to force on 23 January 2017? The instrument number four is the asset transfer request appeal where no contact concluded. Scotland Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-36 at zero. Regulation 51 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that there is no requirement for the Scottish ministers to appoint a member of their own staff to a review panel. Regulation 18-1 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that there may be one or more contact addresses determined in accordance with this regulation. Regulations 18 and 19 could be made clearer to clearly give effect to the policy intention that when a community transfer body sends an electronic communication from an address other than a contact address or addresses contained in a notice of appeal or application, or as subsequently notified in accordance with Regulation 18-2, that does not alter the contact address or addresses. Does the committee agree to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground H in light of this lack of clarity? There is a drafting error in rule 4 to A in the schedule. The reference to notice in writing from the review panel person should admit person. With that in mind, does the committee agree to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground? The Scottish Government has undertaken to rectify the above matters, apart from in relation to Regulations 18 and 19, on reporting and amending instrument. This would take effect, temisly, for these regulations coming to force on 23 January 2017. In light of the undertaking, to lay an amending instrument, does the committee agree to call on the Scottish Government to include in that instrument provision to improve the clarity of Regulations 18 and 19? The fifth instrument is the Community Empyrament Registers of Land Scotland Regulations 2016 SSI 2016 362. It is an anomaly in relation to the numbering of sub-paragraph D and sub-paragraph I1 and 2 of Regulation 21. Sub-paragraphs 1 and 2 should be included under a separate sub-paragraph E, with the numbering in the remaining sub-paragraphs in Regulation 21 updated accordingly. Given this anomaly, does the committee agree to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground H in respect of the form of the regulation that could be clearer? The regulations also contain the following drafting errors. First of all, sub-paragraph G of Regulation 21 incorrectly refers to the Police and Fire Scotland Act 2012, when it should refer to the Police and Fire Reform Scotland Act 2012. And secondly, similarly sub-paragraph I of Regulation 21 incorrectly refers to the Land Registration Scotland Act 2012, when it should refer to the Land Registration etc. Scotland Act 2012. On account of these errors, does the committee agree to draw the regulations to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground? Does the committee agree to welcome the undertaking by the Scottish Government to lay a further instrument to clarify the provisions in respect of all three of these points to take effect before the regulations come into force on 23 January 2017? The sixth instrument is the Land Reform Scotland Act 2016, Consequential and Saving Provision Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-366. In the circumstances where in the state of a deceased person contains two or more interests as tenant under release of an agricultural tendency, the Saving Provision in Regulation 31C and 2 could implement more clearly the policy intention that applies only in respect of an interest or interests that have not been bequeathed by will or other testamentary writing, even though there may be a request of another interest or interests. Accordingly, does the committee agree to draw the regulations to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground H, as the meaning of Regulations 31C and 2 could be clearer? Does the committee agree to welcome the Scottish Government's urgent laying of a further instrument to clarify the provisions? No points have been raised by illegal advisers on the following instruments. The Air Quality Standards Scotland Amendment Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-376. The Land Reform Scotland Act 2016, Consequential and Saving Provision, Amendment Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-389. Is the committee content with these instruments? Yes. Agenda item number three is the consideration of instruments not subject to any parliamentary procedure. No points have been raised by illegal advisers on the following instruments. The Community Empowerment Scotland Act 2015, commencement number four and transitory provision, Order 2016, SSI 2016-363 and inquiries into fatal accidents and sudden deaths etc. Scotland Act 2016, commencement number two, Transitional and transitory provision, Regulations 2016, SSI 2016-370. Is the committee content with these instruments? Yes. We will be on Tuesday, 6 December, when we will again consider SSIs. I close today's meeting. Thank you.