 California has now declared itself a sanctuary state for adults who want to sexually mutilate their children in the name of gender ideology. One father in Texas called Jeff Younger now fears that his ex-wife is taking advantage of this deranged law law that we will all be ashamed of a generation from now. She's just moved to California with their nine-year-old son. She is convinced that the boy is actually a girl. You're a boy, right? No. I'm a girl. Who told you you're a girl? Mommy. And when did she tell you you were a girl? I love girls. Oh, I see. So mommy told you you were a girl? Does mommy do anything else like with a girl with you? Like what? Like dresses. What does she do? She puts dresses on you. Oh, wow. Oh, that's just the saddest thing. That's a child. Well, Jeff Younger, the father of that boy, went to the Texas Supreme Court to try to protect his son. He wanted an order to prevent his ex-wife from having the boy sexually mutilated in the state of California, but the court rejected his petition in an eight-to-one vote. Shocking. Jeff Younger joins us tonight. Mr. Younger, thank you very much for coming on. Will you watch that video when it just hurts? Yeah. I mean, it's the first iPhone video I ever took. And, you know, my blood ran cold when I realized what she had planned for that boy. And, you know, it escalated to eventually she registered him school as a girl. I had to put, shut that down. So the Capel School District began to secretly transition my son. I'd bring my son to school and boys' clothes, and they'd give him a dress and make him use the girl's restroom. And it even escalated further where she began to present him to the world as a girl. I lived under temporary orders from a court where I wasn't even allowed to tell my son that he was a boy, where I had to present him to the world as a girl. And, you know, my, my, his twin brother got completely confused by all this. We wound up going to a 2019 trial where the courts gave me 50-50 custody and joint conservative rights to check her ability to transition my son. And the corrupt Democrat establishment in Dallas County transferred my case into the 301st District Court with Judge Mary Brown, and she never implemented the trial with a jury verdict. And as, through temporary orders, stripped me of all my parental rights and eventually allowed my ex to move to California right before, just a, just a few days before, the sanctuary law in California went into effect. So, it's, it's, it's so upsetting. I mean, we're talking about destroying a child's life. Nine, you know, even last year, people who were in favor, who believed that you could change sexes by active will, even they would concede nine was too young. Now we're just completely off the rails. Did any adult in authority step up to help you and protect this nine-year-old boy? No, she started transitioning when he was two. She tried to enroll him in a gender clinic when he was five, the Genesis Clinic in Dallas, Texas. The pediatricians record show that she intended to chemically castrate him at age eight or nine, his current age, and then he magically moves to California. You know, I don't think this is an accident. Absolutely no one in the state of Texas has stood up for me except for Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General. I went to the legislature on two sessions, and by some quantitative measures, I generated more political power for a bill against transgender child abuse than for any bill in Texas history. Some officers were courting 300 lobbyists a day on my bills. We could not get that bill passed because the speaker of the house, Dade Feelin, blocked those bills from passage. So the legislature did nothing. The governor did not mobilize the agencies to protect Texas children from these abusive procedures. Sterilization and chemical castration did nothing. I could not get the executive branch to move. I thought I would get relief in the appellate courts, in the judicial branch, and I go up to the Texas Supreme Court, and they determined absurdly that my wife is no more likely to transition my son in California under the sanctuary laws than she would in Texas. And absurdly, not even really reading Senate Bill 107 claims that we can enforce an injunction against her in California when a plain reading of the bill says that they will not enforce these adjunctions. They will not obey subpoenas. They will not obey extradition, and they will not return the children to me under any circumstances. At some point, all of these children will be adults, and they're going to look at us, the adults who should have been protecting them. They will. With rage. Yeah, but not you. You've done your best, and our heart goes out to you, for real, and your boy. Jeff Younger, thank you. Thank you, Tucker.