 I think when it comes to the COVID response in Bangladesh, I want to in particular note FAO. FAO really stepped forward from that angle of one health. I as a resident coordinator, I'm much more aware of this initiative, I'm much more aware of its potential and I'm certainly much more aware of its importance when it comes to pandemic preparedness. The resident coordinator at the time, Mia Sapo, was absolutely fantastic in managing this response overall under her leadership. I think she gave really clear mandates. So we had already had the experience of working from sector to sector and how to deal with potential outbreaks of disease and this had a lot of impact for putting together strategies for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic. I guess the big picture about our work in One Health and what we can contribute from the FAO side is recognizing that the work that we actively do every day in the animal health sector is reducing the risk of the next pandemic and that's something that's often forgotten. We've essentially had a pandemic of even influenza going on since in what not over 15 years. The types of pathogens we're dealing with are the same, be it in animals or humans. All the equipment we use are the same. So actually it's that bio safety capacity that we've been working on with these zoonotic diseases that we were able to immediately bring to bear on the response on COVID. So it was an actual extension for us to be able to then apply those tools to working with COVID-19. The community support teams in the end had a massive impact covering over 2 million households helping them understand basically through health extension services the challenges of COVID-19. I guess the best part was that that we work with the young people out there, the volunteers who are from different civil society organizations. I can recall we just trained 1,400 volunteers within nine days. It was IEDCR who helped to train those people. They came to IEDCR and IEDCR people trained them how to collect the sample, how to do the rapid testing and IEDCR also provided the medical technologist who were always with the CSTs under their supervision actually CST did this work at field level. The CSTs were able to validate the use of the rapid test at household level with support from IEDCR. So able to show that we can actually bring diagnostic services into these communities and that people who even aren't medical doctors but they're able to actually still perform that test reliably. At that time number of sample collection was enormously increased. We could collect more than 180 samples per day from the people who are living in the SLAM area. Then the next thing help us is the CST mobile app like digitalization of the surveillance system itself. So CST had their mobile with their surveillance app they just need to fill up and we grabbed the data it's like live streaming of the data from the field. So we were able to quickly always make changes to the CST app and deploy that very quickly as new needs arose in the field and later also include vaccination registration. When we were dealing with even influenza we always found that there was this bias or this blind spot particularly for the very poor marginalized communities. They were never being included in the surveillance systems they weren't perceived to be important. But yet wherever we go in providing those tools they always find that these communities have been affected by the disease so that reminds us of always to try to shine a light in the areas that are in the shadow that's how we you know bring about better disease control. And what was really interesting from the COVID work is that that was the same thing that the CST work found that it wasn't that the disease had somehow bypassed the slums of DACA it had moved through the slums of DACA even faster than other parts of the city probably because of the higher densities and the higher contact rates but no one noticed and that was also confirmed from the research as well you know the disease actually moved through here first but no one would have known unless we actually went out of our way and provided support to bring health services to these communities. Initially I know that those volunteers when they work in the field they got this resistance from the people. So that you know approach of building community trust is so essential to be able to actually have an effective community-based response. We capitalized under the community support initiative on the extensive experience and network of NGOs and this ensured that there was a capacity to bring the information to bring the outreach really to the doorstep of people who might otherwise not have been reached. I think ultimately that's why we say goodbye by bond you know this has been our strategy from the very first day. We're all brothers and sisters and if we have communities working hand-in-hand with our public health authorities then everyone wins and no one is left behind.