 So, Mike Bloomberg's campaign is alleging that there have been multiple acts of vandalism at his campaign offices across the country. Now, the reason why I put the word vandalism in quotations is because some of what he describes as so-called vandalism isn't actually even vandalism. And second of all, I really stress that word alleged, because even though we have really no reason at least based on the evidence that we've seen, to doubt that these have in fact happened and it's not just something that his campaign did to make it seem as if he's a more sympathetic figure, but I mean, Mike Bloomberg is an incredibly manufactured candidate. Everything about him is fake. He's bought his endorsements, he's funding Astroturf, so if we're putting on our tinfoil hats for a moment, wouldn't it really be that surprising if his campaign staff vandalize their own offices just so that way they can maybe gain some political points from it? I mean, is it unlikely? Yes. Is it completely out of the question? No, not necessarily, especially given the way that he's responded, because he's using this as an opportunity to attack Bernie Sanders. Now, let me remind you, he's been running ads alleging that Bernie Sanders supporters are harassing people online. So he's trying to construct this Bernie Bro narrative to suggest that people who support Bernie Sanders are uniquely violent and uniquely mean, right? So once you kind of establish that narrative, well, doesn't it make sense that maybe a Bernie Sanders supporter did this? And he's calling on Bernie Sanders basically to condemn all of these acts of violence against his campaign headquarters or acts of vandalism, excuse me. And there's no evidence that a Bernie Sanders supporter did this. But before we even get to that aspect of the story, let's look at these acts of vandalism here because it kind of tells us more about Mike Bloomberg than it does the vandals. For example, you have the words racist, sexist, GOP oligarch spray painted on the windows of this building. You have a broken window at one campaign office. You have racist oligarch fuck Bloomberg spray painted on this building. You have corporate pig spray painted on the window of this building, as you can see here. And then you have a sign that says, eat the rich taped to the windows of this building in Flint, Michigan. And you also have a spray painted sign with the words oligarch leaning against this building. So the latter two examples are not vandalism. If somebody's just taping a sign, a piece of paper literally to your building, if they're just like making a sign and then leaning it against your building, that's not vandalism. There's no damage to your property there. So that's not vandalism. It's not. Now, for the other acts of vandalism, is that technically vandalism? Sure. But simultaneously, what else are these acts doing? They're protesting Mike Bloomberg, who quite literally is a racist, sexist Republican oligarch. They don't like these forms of protest, but they are signs of protest nonetheless. The public reacts very strongly to someone who they perceive to be damaging them. So whenever there is a racist in the neighborhood or a Nazi, the same thing happens. For example, this man in Iowa had confederate flags and swastikas in his yard and guess what happened? His property got vandalized. Somebody wrote Nazi scum in his yard. Are we supposed to cry over that victim as well? You may not like the type of protest that this is. People may think that vandalism is always going to be universally bad, but there's some truth here. I am not saying that we should vandalize the property of Mike Bloomberg. I don't condone that, of course, but this is people speaking out against an oligarch who's trying to buy the selection. By showing us all of this, by showing the strong response to people who are against your racism and your sexism, this is kind of embarrassing. If I were Mike Bloomberg, I wouldn't put this up. I wouldn't have shared this, but they're trying to make this into an issue. It's embarrassing. The worst part is that they freaked out over that sign that was taped to the building that says Etha Rich in Flint, Michigan. This is who Mike Bloomberg donated to. Governor Rick Snyder, the individual responsible for poisoning Flint, Michigan's residents. So let's just put this into perspective and how ironic this whole situation is. Mike Bloomberg is crying victim because somebody dared to tape a sign to one of his buildings in Flint, Michigan after he helped victimize the people of Flint, Michigan by getting that scoundrel, that corrupt pig Rick Snyder elected. No, they're not victimizing you, in Flint, Michigan, Michael Bloomberg. You victimized them. You helped elect the individual who poisoned an entire city of people. So forgive me for not feeling too much pity for you, even though this sign hurt your feelings a lot. And I think that Robert Ryde put it best, cost of repairing Flint's water pipes, 55 million, cost of Mike Bloomberg's ad spending, 505.8 million. America deserves better than an oligarch wasting his fortune trying to buy the presidency. Yeah. So instead of running for president, you could have just used your money to make a difference. But instead, you're in the city of Flint, residents of which you helped to victimize by electing their corrupt governor who poisoned them and now you're crying victim because somebody taped a sign that said, eat the rich to your building, unreal. And on top of that, he is with zero evidence claiming that Bernie Sanders supporters are responsible and he's calling on Bernie Sanders to condemn this literally. So as Christina Cabrera of Talking Points Memo reports, Bloomberg campaign manager Kevin Sheekey admitted in a statement that quote, while we do not know who is directly responsible, Sanders and his campaign have repeatedly invoked this language and the word oligarch to describe the billionaire. Senator Sanders refusal to denounce these illegal acts is a sign of his inability to lead and his willingness to condone and promote Trump-like rhetoric has no place in our politics, Sheekey said. So they have no idea who did this. We have no idea who did this. For all we know, it could have been Mike Bloomberg's own team trying to make him look bad, look like the victim. But nonetheless, regardless, he's blaming Bernie Sanders for this. Okay, so if you're going to blame Bernie Sanders for this and you're literally going to call on Bernie Sanders to condemn something that he had nothing to do with, are you going to condemn the individual who threw a rock through Bernie Sanders campaign headquarters in Seattle? Are you going to condemn that, Michael Bloomberg? Because this isn't something that is unique to your campaign. This happens in a polarized America. Campaign offices are oftentimes vandalized. It's just a matter of, are you going to try to weaponize this issue to make you look better in a campaign that you are the one who's been divisive? I mean, you've been waging class warfare, you've been a Republican. So how dare you paint yourself as the victim? You don't dare portray yourself as the victim when you're the one who's being divisive. You're trying to buy this election and you're attacking the front-runner currently. And yet you're claiming that Bernie Sanders is divisive, unreal. So listen, every single person needs to say loudly and clearly that if Mike Bloomberg is the nominee, they will not vote for him. They will sit out this election because we cannot allow this authoritarian Republican oligarch to play this dirty and then go on to win the presidency. I think he'd get his ass beat by Donald Trump in a general, but he needs to know that everything that he's doing is not going to pay off. We're not going to allow him to buy his way into the White House. And if he is successful at doing that, we're not going to show up to support him. I don't care about this vote, Blue, no matter who. Like if you are that evil, then the difference between Bloomberg and Trump, I mean, I honestly don't really know the difference. Maybe Donald Trump appoints Supreme Court justices and federal judges that are more extreme than Bloomberg possibly. But the impact that this has on democracy for years to come may be worse than whatever Donald Trump can do in four years. Because after a Bloomberg successful run, then we're going to see Jeff fucking Bezos and then Mark Zuckerberg run unacceptable. So either way, it's a lose, lose situation. And regardless, if Mike Bloomberg were to win or Trump were to get reelected, our country is going to be badly hurt for decades to come. So people need to really make it very clear that they are not going to support Mike Bloomberg. In fact, I think we're, we have this moral responsibility to speak out and say, we're not going to vote for you no matter what. I don't care if you're going up against Donald Trump, you could put Mike Bloomberg up against Satan. We're not voting for you. You will never get our votes because we do not condone you buying this democracy, buying this election, especially with how dirty he's willing to play. It's disgusting. So I mean, he can cry the victim all he wants. But just realize that as people speak out and condemn him, they're telling the truth. You may not like the vandalism, the so-called vandalism. But these people are correct and they're speaking out against you. Maybe you should listen to the peasants for once, Mike Bloomberg, rather than just talking at them smugly like the oligarch elitist prick that you are.