 So in reading your profile, I noticed that you talked about being a senior member of Defense, Procurement and Acquisition Policy, right? Yes. So I had to look that up and I looked it up, I found it, right? Because again, you know, we're dealing with contracting folks. So obviously, we don't ever make it to acquisition policy or, you know, we never, we don't even know what that stuff, you know, that doesn't, it impacts us obviously. And I'm sure throughout this conversation, you'll explain the ways in which it does impact us. But for us at the ground level, who won our first $50,000, $100,000 contract, we can't see that far down the road. So the things that we can see is in reading that statement, it mentioned DARS, right? Yes. And I've never heard of DARS, but we've all heard of the FAR. So how is DARS versus the FARs and D-FARs different? Can you explain some of that? I can, yes. So the FAR, everybody, if you're in the government contracting space, you have to be familiar with the FAR because it's Federal Acquisition Regulation. And it's all of the rules that are put in place that contracting officers have to follow in solicitations and contract awards and contract administration on the government end. And it's also the rules that contractors have to follow. And those rules are placed into contracts as clauses. So you have the FAR that governs all of federal contracting. And then the D-FARs, which is the defense FAR supplement, is the rules that govern contracting within the Department of Defense. So if you have a contract with DOD, you need to be very familiar with the FAR, which is all of the federal government. And you need to be familiar with the DOD supplement to the FAR, which contains unique and special rules that govern just DOD. And every agency has its own supplement to the FAR. So NASA has a supplement to the FAR, GSA has a supplement to the FAR. So whoever your contract is with, whatever agency, you should be aware of, obviously, the FAR regulation and the clauses that flow from that, but also that agency's supplement. And so DARS is the Defense Acquisition Regulation System. So that's the system in place that, on a very routine basis, is looking at ways to revise, amend the D-FARs, and they are part of the FAR system as well. So they're looking at ways to revise the FAR. And those changes come out, and they either impact the, again, governments out of the house, or they impact contractors through revisions to, or additional contract clauses that are incorporated. Okay. Now, okay, so DARS is the system that used to change it. Why would they want to change it? Give us some reasons why they might want to change the FAR. One may be because Congress said so. So every year, Congress publishes its rules. And it's called the NDAA. I can't remember what that stands for, but it's essentially a compilation of all of the changes that Congress has decided to make to the FAR or the agency supplements. NASA and DOD are constantly, just because they're the bigger agencies and they have, you know, bigger dollars as it relates to contractors. Many times, Congress wants to make changes to those rules. And some of it is because either to streamline the acquisition process to make it easier for contractors, particularly small businesses, to be able to compete. So you may have, you know, a congressman or a senator who's received complaints from, you know, the small businesses that are part of their constituency. And as a result of those conversations with their constituents, they, you know, make recommendations through the congressional process to make changes to the FAR or DFAR. So that's one way changes are made. Another is the president can decide that as part of their agenda that they want to make changes to the FAR. So when President Obama was in office, you know, labor was one of his huge initiatives. And so we saw on the DOD side of the House a lot of changes in the form of executive orders that he implemented that impacted the federal regulations that we had in place as it relates to government contracts. So many of the changes that we made during the Obama administration resulted from those executive orders that he issued. And then also it could just be just industry usually petitions of various agencies with issues or concerns that they have related to rules that they have to follow in the contract. So now the cybersecurity rules that have come out, it's a huge area where you have industry groups that are petitioning DOD as far as, you know, we have these rules in place and it's a huge burden on us to follow. And so in listening to the feedback that we get from industry, we could, you know, make a change to the regulations or to the clauses to support that as well. And then sometimes, you know, just the agency personnel themselves, contracting officers and their day-to-day businesses might see an error or, you know, many times when I was in that role, we would enact a rule. And we didn't necessarily understand fully the impact it would have both on the contracting officer who's trying to administer that requirement or on industry itself. So as that feedback kind of flows its way to the top of the organization, that's also, you know, feedback or information that's used to support, you know, a change to the regulation. Okay. I could see that. Is the 809 panel, is that part of that process? Or is it one of those groups that they're looking at helping or shaping some of this? Yeah, the Section 809 panel is a panel that was actually Congress required that it be put into place. And they're looking at across all of the regulations, ways to streamline the acquisition process. Many times, you know, when new regulations come into place, especially the ones that we have to put in place because of congressional requirements or presidential requirements through executive orders or through Congress, through the statutes, often those changes to the FAR don't take into consideration big picture. So big picture view, we have an acquisition life cycle in place. And at various parts of that process, there are certain requirements that both the government has to comply with and that contractors have to comply with. And if you look across the board, the compilation of all of those requirements has costs in the form of the amount of time it takes people to comply with it in terms of just the amount of money it takes in order to comply as far as putting systems in place and all of that. And so sometimes when you implement a new rule in the form of a regulation, you don't consider big picture how is this affecting every other thing that has to be complied with. So the purpose of that panel, you got a lot of seasoned senior folks across the government who have, you know, wealth of information and very long careers who came together to put forth recommendations to change the FAR and either remove certain regulations, streamline certain regulations, or possibly enhance. And so that panel put together a huge document, I think it's multiple hundred pages document of recommendations, three volumes, yeah, for that process. And based on those recommendations, there could be changes to the FAR or other agency supplements to the FAR as a result of it.