 und 60er Jahren gehört haben. Da gab es ordentliches Anböbeln. Fand ich ziemlich beeindruckend, aber was macht der Bundestag eigentlich sonst so die ganze Zeit? Und das sind zwei Speakers, die eine interessante Interpretation haben. Okay, ja, vielen Dank. Wir sind immer etwas nervös, weil es immer viele Leute gibt. Ich mag es, dass alle von euch nackt sind, aber ich kann es nicht sehen. Von mir zu uns, wie sich die Gesellschaft und die Lange changed, in den Speakers im Deutschen Parlament, der Bundestag. Wir wollen das Tool, das Online-Seit, das ist ein großer Wettbewerb, aufbaut. Und dann schauen wir uns ein paar Beispielen an. Wie die Rechts-Wing-Party, die Klima-Debate, wie die Leute sich aneinander kursen. Und dann werden wir mehr aktiv. Okay, vielen Dank für die Interesse in die Politik und die Plenary-Debate. Es ist nicht wirklich etwas, was wir erwähnt haben. Denn der Bundestag TV, das ist eigentlich eine TV-Station, die alle Speakers von dem Bundestag hat. Es gibt nicht viele Leute, die dort schauen. Und da haben wir eigentlich alle diese parlamentarischen Debate in ein Database von 1949. Und jetzt haben wir ein Surgen-Engine, in dem wir einen Termin haben. Und das wird zeigen, wie oft dieser Termin war und auch, wann es war. Für jetzt ist es nur Frequenz. Aber man kann eigentlich sehen Trends und Tendenz, was passiert. Wenn man in Daten und Nummern interessiert, gibt es viele Protokolle. Es gibt 19-Elektion-Periods. Und wir haben alle sie als TXT-File. Und die letzten sind XML. Also, wenn du es mit dir spielen willst, kannst du es mit dir spielen. Und wir haben gedacht, zu demonstrieren, wir nutzen einen Termin, in dem jeder Internet weiß. At least everyone in this room should know it. This is how it looks. You put in a word and you get a graph. So, on the lower axis, there's the years. And then there's basically how mentions per 100,000 per year. Now we have 20 mentions per 100,000 words. And it's important to do this relative. Now, the Internet is actually used quite a bit, it's mentioned quite a bit, compared to other debates. Now just to have a look at what you can see. Stop, there's something else I want to show you. This is the very first mention of Internet. Telebanking, Teleshopping, also Telecommunication, Facts, the Internet, all of that might not determine the parliament's people's lives. But it does determine everyone's life and also business life for everyone. Now, this was not very prophetic to be fair. Okay, now let's look at the time. So, the mention that we saw was in December 1994. The Internet, TM, existed for a while. ARPARNET, which was originally militarily and maybe a little scientifically, is a little bit older. But it was even made public before. There was the first browser even, Mosaic. And here you can see what did people talk about. So, we looked at all the protocols, what was this peak? And at this point, in the year 2000, it was about applications basically. So, like, mobile Internet banking, the Internet age, parliamentary members, talk more and more, debate more and more about how do people use it and what do we need to make available to people. And then there's nothing for a while. And then 2008, 2009, what happened there? Do you know? Okay, 100 points for Sensuzula. And the next one? Sensuzula was the German minister that tried to stop the Internet. And where the first time came up, access to Internet is a basic right. And 2011 was basically the German Court, Federal Court, which said we cannot actually just steal the Internet from people. This is something that's against basic rights. Be careful, there's a big trick. And then there's a lot more to come. Actually, there's quite a lot of traps around. We're going to look at some here. Why did we not start talking about Russia before? The older ones will remind, oh, Soviet Union, if we include Soviet Union with Russia, we get a completely different picture. Wow, Cold War, you know? And then Russia didn't was that strong. Now, look at Russia alone, and now look at with the Soviet Union, puts it into relation. But there's a hole in the middle. What happened there in the middle? Here, between Soviet Union and Russia. What happened there? Where are the boomers? Oh, there was a community of former Soviets. Oh, there they are. They had their own name. In German, we call it G.U.S. Ah, yeah, you see the problem. We're always talking about the same thing. And then actually in German, we had a reform of writing, and Russia was written differently before with SZ, and now it's written with double S. So when you do your searches, be very careful. For instance, Hate and Love, also Hate, is spelled differently before the reform, the orthographic reform. What happened with Love? Why suddenly out of nowhere? Look, this is Love. Oh, this is the activity. This is in German, Love and Dear is the same word. So, they say Dear Chancellor, Dear Colleagues, which in German translate into the same word, Libe Colleague, such as Love. So you got to be careful when you analyze and try to find out what kind of words it uses. You have more anonymous. Oh, okay, here's a first topic. The rhetoric of the right. We looked at what is extreme right, how often is the word extreme right, or outright. Again, there is different kind of words, you see on the top here, everything we put in one. And there's been several peaks, different events, the bomb in Hojas Verda and the attack in other Eastern German countries. And you see where the spikes come up, that's when, again, per 100.000 words mentioning. A Fölkisch is a typical right extreme word, meaning the people. And there's a combination of different German, very exact in using different words. So we summed them up together and the Fölkisch word comes a lot more often than right extreme. Because probably when the right came up, the AfD, its first president, Frau Kepetry, tried to positively position the word Popula or Fölkisch. Oh, here is Refugee. There is another point, this is Refugees. Be careful, the first Refugees were repatriated Germans from the former Eastern territories. And we called them for three minutes, displaced persons. So you have to put in displaced persons to take that up. You remember what that was in 55? There were the boat people in the 80s here in the middle. You remember the boat people when Vietnam fell in Asterix to the communist regime. There were the first, they were called Flüchtlinge, which are Refugees. And AFD, when the AfD entered the Bundestag, Refugees snapped up, that's the big peak in 2015. Another one connected with the AfD, green, left, left green, not the fascist, untranslatable, shitty basically. But you don't say that in the parliament. But it happens. But nobody mentioned that, the combination of left and green. Only the AfD was the first to use that combination. Oh, fake news, or Lügenpresse, which is lying media. There we go, A gain with AfD. But there is a peak before that in 2010, without the AfD, AfD doesn't create its own words. Sometimes it just takes what is already there. The first mentioning of lying press is a chap, Thomas Bares from the CDU CSU, citing the Russian president Erdogan, Turkish Erdogan, who calls his own media lying media. Here comes fake news in itself. There's Mr. 45th president, let's not call his name, Mr. Trump, and he brought the fake news also to the German parliament. Oh, then you have this typical word of old parties, or the classical parties, that's another right-wing word, versus we are the new people, we are the new parties, and the old parties. And in 1985, 1990, it wasn't the right, it was the greens that used the old parties versus us. Actually, it was Schiele, who mentioned it, left, who then became a member of the government, and changed to the CDU. Oh. Okay, we'll talk about environment and climate. Okay, so there's a lot of nice terms that we can look at, and that can show us interesting stuff. One of them is climate protection, environmental protection. It's not actually a new topic that we sometimes think. But what is interesting is that it was discussed, debated on a different term, because it used to be environmental protection, which is the blue line on here. And now we kind of have this idea of climate protection, because we kind of think that environmental protection is something different right now. And environmental protection has become global, whereas climate protection is also more like local. And now we basically only mention climate protection usually. Okay, this is something that the peaks, I also find very interesting. In 1983, the greens are first in the parliament, and we can see that they are sort of agenda setting in this. So they managed to make environmental protection big. And then the second one is the UN climate report from 2007. That basically stated for the first time, there's human made climate change. And it was basically the first time that the scientific consensus was published to a general audience. Now let's just talk very shortly about sort of like there's peaks and lows, what debates are big, what debates are small. Let's take a look at climate change. And also compared to refugees. Then we can see that it's very different, there's a different scale. Now climate change is very important, but actually the refugee debate was one of the most important debates ever. Of course we have to kind of restrict what we can actually say, because we only have a limited way of saying, because we only use some words, but refugees, they were just such a huge topic. Climate change really doesn't matter compared to it. And now let's look at something that's been important for all throughout. Joblessness, exactly. And again, climate change is not important compared to joblessness or people not having jobs. And then let's take education, which is also always important. We're lucky, we think that's a good thing. We talk about making it more federal and not having all the different states be responsible for it the way it is right now. There's always a big debate about that. And what's one of the largest debates, what do you think? The economy. And money. The parliament is talking more and more about money. Now just to have an idea of the scales of things, so that you see what exactly is happening. 60, 80, it's just really, really a lot. So these refugee debates really dominated Perniament for a while. Now let's talk about environmental protection and environmental damages, exactly. These are different terms for damages to the environment. For example, forest dying. Yeah. In the 80s, there was a big debate about sour rain. And then there was a lot of more talk about Waldsterben and about the effects of Waldsterben instead of the causes of Waldsterben. So, first it was what do we see and then what happened. And then suddenly it wasn't important anymore because the forest had already died, so who cares. There's also some confusing things, like Rhine. Why was there such a big debate about the Rhine in the 1980s? And a couple of other peaks during other times. And we might think, well, Rhine, it might be a flood. But actually floods don't really explain this. Just a couple of those peaks. Instead, this one large peak in the center in the 80s. We don't really have an explanation. But then we googled a little bit and we found the Sanders Catastrophe. It was a big chemical explosion, chemical calamity. And a lot of chemical stuff went into the Rhine and we suddenly had a lot of fish dying. And this was sort of what led to these debates about the Rhine, suddenly. And then something quite interesting, Chernobyl. Which, of course, is quite easily explained. Chernobyl was a huge atomic catastrophe in the 80s. And then fear. Fear and Chernobyl are sort of related. So it seems that fear and Chernobyl disaster correlate. And other things like atomic energy debate. It also seems to have relations to fear. But do you have any idea where the first peak of fear, which is the orange line here at the beginning of the 80s. What's that? What did people really fear at that point? Any ideas? Well, yeah, so we have nuclear missiles. Is that? Yeah, okay, so you have some NATO debate. And so, while having certain atomic nuclear missiles on German soil. And you see this also peak the Chernobyl again. So this kind of correlates with fear. And so people didn't forget that atomic missiles have something to do with atomic explosions. So yeah, we've been some examples that you can compare terms to use this tool to understand when which debates have been done and when they didn't appear. So, but now we're going about cursing at each other in mannered insults. So insults, well mannered insults, yeah. So at the end you have a list of all the insults we looked for. So it's always funny. And so of course we look for insults. But not only. So we have strict rules for interrupts. So usually you have interrupts. If you call someone asshole, then you will get a call to order and you have to apologize for it. And if it's really bad, you even have to pay money for it. So these are very strict rules. And now let's just check those like this. So how many calls to orders have been there in Parliament? So as you see at the beginning, it was rather silent. Then you have the Green Party, suddenly it peaks. Then again it went rather calm. And then the AfD joined and suddenly you have a peak up again. And there's a second thing that's like interruptions. So the interruptions of the Green Line. So if someone talks, the opposition usually can interrupt. And mostly they don't agree. They also like a protocol by the Parliament writers. And they say what was in this interruption. And we check this as well. So you see it's a similar line, the Green one of both sides. And one more about like the climate in the Parliament. This is about just laughing. So what about laughing? Laughter. So this is not funny laughing. This is usually those people who make the protocols. Say if it's mocking people. So when someone says something and then someone else is mocking them and just laughing at them. So only then they will like protocol the laughter, not otherwise. Otherwise like it's a heiterkeit. That's just funny stuff. Yes, some funniness. If this is like, it looks like it's getting less and less funny at the Parliament, as you can see. And there are some classics for insults. So now think about, what will you think about classic insults? Well, I think the result is surprising. Okay. Pretender is like the first one, which I think is a liar. Or like the hypocrite. Yeah, like it's a liar, which is like the female liar. Lügner is male, Lügner is female. Idiot. And now it's something that is not in my active, in my use. I use that maybe dick, but that's a bit. Teig, Ruffian. It's just some kind of Ruffian. Yeah. And Fliegel, which is also a bit Ruffian. Depp, which is just like a rather dull person. Throttle is just like also, it's a bit like idiot. Also a dumb person. And then of course ass, asshole, assholes. So those are also of course in there. And if you say such things, even like hypocrite or liar, you can be called to order. And maybe even have to pay money for that. And of course you don't want that as a member of parliament. But they're tricks. So how can you do that? So Volker Beck said, so if there's no call to order, if there were no call to order, Mr. President. In that case, I would say that what the coalition is doing now is hypocrisy. And so in that case, because he's talking around it, he doesn't get a call to order. Or the king of calls to order, Herbert Wiener. He said, so there's something that this is not in the protocol, because it was after the end of the protocol. So you won't find this one. He once said to the German President, excuse me, Mr. President, very sorry, but you're an asshole. So in that case, within the debate. Okay, so that's really hard to translate, anyone any idea? So basically the German small-minded person, Bigot, is filled with shit. Yeah. And you're a good example for that. Exactly. Yeah. So there's like two examples. One is like Humbuck. Incredible. And the other one is, oh, this can't be incredible. And we see that there seems to have been a change in terms just like they use this different terms for the same concept. So we'll talk about, so we have a couple of examples. Of how language changed and then things also changed. One of them is from ... Oh, the old word for telecommunications was fernmündigwesen. It's just a very German word for the same thing. Now they use telecommunication, which is the same word, but in the Latin origin, and it means digital communication. Okay, yeah. And then the thing that gave us our title, we changed from I and me to we and us basically. So people in parliament, they don't really say I anymore. Instead they say sort of like we. So it might be the pluralist-managed status, which is basically the queen talks of herself as we. It used to be that before, like authors didn't write I, instead they wrote we. Sometimes in academic journals we still have this, as modesty exactly. And why did something change? Well, because there's new forms. There's inclusive we and exclusive we. Extensive we. Which we called Merkel we. Which is like something that she has, she often used. We need to do something. Because usually it's not the person speaking that actually will do this. But instead it's more like talking about us as a general construct. And this is something we call extensive we. And this is new. And this is why we see this kind of change happening. And it's not related to people suddenly thinking they're the queen of England. But instead it's these new kinds of we. And it used to be like a slogan during an election. That we, that they didn't know do we actually capitalize we or not. But the inclusive we is actually capitalized. Okay, now terrorism. Of course the peaks are pretty obvious. We have RAF terrorism, which is like left wing. Exactly. And then like Al-Qaeda ISIS. But there's one other word that's kind of similar in German. And terror is actually terror is the word that basically means the same thing. But people now use it instead of terrorism. And terror and terrorism are basically French words or come from French. And some terrorism is an ideology. Whereas terror is sort of the effect it has on the people. But despite it. So some people figured terrorism is too sort of long and too complicated. So terror suddenly isn't something that describes a status or an action. But instead it's something concrete. So it's about the feeling that happens because of these. The reason is most likely that you talk more about it and it's just shorter. And so it's what you use often has to be short and terrorism is just too much to say. So now let's say about climate change and climate catastrophes or climate change is green and climate catastrophes in orange. And you see that climate catastrophe is older and climate change is actually older. So when you have the ozone hole in the atmosphere you see like climate catastrophe. So we see even if climate catastrophe is the word people do something about it. Because FCKV have been abolished pretty quickly. And there's something that does something for the climate. So the ozone hole is like closing. And now we talk about climate change and not climate catastrophe. And you see maybe then we do something about in 2050. So we see the language clearly has an effect on what happens in the real world. So if it's a catastrophe and now you have like security scanners and not like. And here again you see like climate change is like a wish. And we have a wish for bloggers and journalists. Please don't write climate change. Write climate catastrophe. That's really better and more accurate. A pause for that. And I looked at a blog that talked about this and they talk about climate change. And they have tools with which you can change these one word. So maybe you can just make it automatically that you always change climate climate change to climate catastrophe in their blog. So to have more climate catastrophe and less climate change in the discussion. Again. So now about ministers. So the female and the male version. So the blue ones are female in singular and plural. And now you see that the orange one is the singular male version. So we have more ministers. More millen. Yeah the plot. So the orange plot is so 1961. You suddenly have one female minister. So that's the peak in the 60s. One minister of she was minister of health. And suddenly they started talking about that. And fortunately this is like improving over time. So the female plural form can be used now for both men and women in the plural concluding. So and now. And now it's about you. About the audience. So we will go to the website and hope it works with the with the Wi-Fi. So let's check. Okay. So they're now discussing how to get to the website. And they just hope it works. And now we'll have a Q&A. A pretty long one. Hi. Okay. So I'll just moderate on your Q&A. So if you want to try the tool. You can go to the microphones. And signal angel has been seen. Okay. So until now you just see my background. My desktop background. That's rather boring and not good. I'll chat while they know tried to tool and check whether it works and whether they get it onto the beamer. Let's hope they do. And it's just. The joys of technology. Okay. So now works. And now they are on. Okay. So. The idea is. You tell us words and we look at them and then we'll have a little. What's your first? What's the first proposal? Oh. Speed limit. And there are actually multiple words for speed in German. So they have like speed limit one, which is tempo for speed. You see, it has been there before. It's not a new topic obviously. And now they are trying the second word for speed, which is Geschwindigkeit. Speed und Velocity. So now they are checking for. So now they also have to check for German Grammar, which has cases. So they have to use it in different grammatical forms. So they see if they get something else for velocity. It seems that this is rather old debate. Nothing new. Obviously never really worked. I don't know why. Maybe it's about some big industries who don't care for that. Okay, Signal Angel is now. I have questions from the chat. Let's make two words. Okay, so freedom is the first one. And again speed limit, but they will. Okay, listen, freedom and speed limit in correlation. So let's see if this correlates. Oh, it doesn't look like it. Maybe a bit in parts, but let's say rather. No, let's say freedom and security. Oh, and now suddenly you see freedom loses against security. We're sorry, but yeah. Microphone number two. Gender specific insults. Used against women. I would be interested in emancipated. That's a German swear word for an emancipated woman. Feminazi would be a good one. Emanze, here we are. Okay, so there have just been like five cases of Emanze mentioned in Parliament. So it can be used as an insult, but it's not necessary. What will be really interesting in that case will be like the specific points in the protocol, because as there have only been five occasions, this will be really interesting to see when they used it, if it's actually used as an insult or not. Okay, so now microphone number six. Servions. Servions. Well, it's, it's, it's about the surveillance and they said, well, I think it's bad about surveillance. It's a lot of mentions. Oh, well, you see, it's been talked about pretty often and very big peak in the 70s, in mid 70s. Everyone knows that, end of the 70s. So what was the first biggest discussion? Yeah, it was about like the census. That's when they talked about surveillance, because suddenly everyone thought the state wants to know who they are. But a short remark, if you look at the scale to the right, it's not a very big debate, because you see on the right that you just have two to four mentions per 100,000 words. So that's not very, very often debate talked about. Okay, now. War. And, and, and, and use in war. Okay, let's say war. You see that this is war, but it's not the war of the Bundeswehr, so of the German Army. It's the war of others. If you really look for like the wars of, if you have to look for, for what the German Army does, if you have to look for euphemisms, like stabilization, missions, yes, stabilization missions, or peace missions. So this is what the German Army does. You can check for Afghanistan. So you have Afghanistan missions. Again, rather small. You see those debates about where you send the German Army. It's not that big as you could hope that they talk about it. You have a number. Three reunification. GDR and so cold GDR. Okay, we'll see that. So she's. While the so cold DDR is a bit difficult. So because we don't know if Anne Grammstone worked that well. So maybe there's no, no, there's no so cold DDR. Aber es ist ein Problem mit dem Tool. N-Grams sind etwas schwierig zu bauen. Ich muss das erinnern. Okay, wir sehen SPZ. Das ist die Sowjet-Occupation Zone. Ja, das ist die Sowjet-Occupation Zone. Und dann vielleicht die Eastern Zone oder die East Zone. Ja, das ist auch nicht so. Aber ihr seht, DDR ist... Wir benutzen Cyber versus Internet. Okay, Cyber versus Internet. Ah, ihr seht, Cyber ist... Es ist nicht ein enormes Thema. Cybersecurity, oh Gott. Ja, also wir adden das so, wie Cyber, Cybersecurity, vielleicht Cyberspace, natürlich. Das hört sich nicht an. Es ist eher... Schmerz. Wir haben nur 0,8 und dann ihr seht, ein neues Land, das sehr... Ein neues Land ist etwas sehr deutscher. Es hat viel gesagt. Wir haben auch noch ein paar Fragen. Wir haben noch ein paar Fragen. Es gibt noch eine Frage. Weil wir dann noch etwas Zeit haben... Okay, Nummer 3. In Verbindung mit Cyberspace... In Verbindung mit Cyberspace... Das ist ein neues Land. In Deutschland ist es ein neues Land. Und es wird ein Meme. Ja. In Konnexion mit falschen News, Ente, das ist ein deutscher Wort für eine falsche News, eine alte. Okay, ihr seht, es ist sehr rarer, aber etwas anderes, wenn ihr euch das zu kompürieren, mit nur einem Wettbewerb. Ein Wettbewerb mit Wettbewerb, Radio, TV und Internet. Wenn ihr das gegen die anderen plattet, seht ihr, wie die Medien verändert. So, Newspapers, TV und Radio. Well, Newspaper und TV go down, Radio, well stays, but Internet, Microphone 1. I'd be interested, and how often do they say the foreigners? So, there's one word, it's like just external territories, one German word. So, there's a lot of that. But more interesting is about foreignness, not foreign countries. And you see, this is interesting. In the 90s, what could that be? Well, then we're against asylum seekers. And yeah, there's several words for asylum seekers. It's not very often used. It's actually asylum seeker. Yeah, the word is application. For the German, it's like asylum application. Google and Facebook. Okay, yeah, Google and Facebook exist. We've heard about that. You see, Facebook wins, as usual. Microphone 4, someone asked about Twitter, and they said, Twitter, there's no Twitter, it's totally irrelevant, sorry. I would like to know Solidarity. And my thesis is that, if we refer only to the Polish organization and not to Solidarity in our politics. It could be true. We see here, if we correlated with Poland, we see, yeah, it seems to be a correlation. At least the first peak start with this could be with the number of mentions of Poland. Microphone 6. Mich würde interessieren sexuelle Gewalt oder Gewalt, sexual terror or sexual force against women. Sexual violence. Okay, as a 2 gram, this works. So you see here. Very rare, unfortunately. 0.4. Very, very rare topic. We think that violence against women won't work, because it's a 3 gram, but let's check we don't have any 3 grams now. No, there's no violence against, but there's like just, the word is domestic violence, yeah. Domestic violence, that works. Interessant. To different times you have sexual violence and domestic violence. And then you see like just rape. Wow. I think that this 1995 and 1997, you had a bigger debate, it seems like there's a bigger debate about sexual violence. As a mention for me, I think the rest one is for the refugees in 1915. Sorry, as an explanation for the debate in the 1990s, they made marital rape in Germany. So that's why there was this big debate in the 1990s. Okay, I didn't understand the question, sorry. But yeah, it's now like digitalisation versus automation. Because I think one of them switched the other. So automation doesn't exist, actually. And then it's about robots. Somebody says robots, robotisation. They have robotisation, but yeah, there's robots, but also very rarely. So parliament doesn't talk about tech stuff. Oh, Schutzlücke. That's a space lack of protection, darknet and video surveillance. So. It doesn't. So you see darknet and it's not correlated. But darknet is in general, whenever it's about like expansion of executive rights. So what the executive branch does do. Okay, so now you have video surveillance. And then what else? Like ED, which is Electronical Data, blah, blah, blah. So it's a German word for IT. Microphone number one. We had freedom. Let's see equal rights and equality. Equality, equal rights. And whoop, but there's an R, no two E's. Okay, so now they're making typos. Yeah, he's a professor for linguistics, not for writing, not for spelling. Okay, so I see like, and now it's like equality and equal positioning. But I don't think that there's a word in English. Very German. Very German word, yeah. Yeah, you see that this is, it's not very, very concisive. But what was 1949 about this? This could be just when the, well Germany came back and maybe when you had like two German states and so maybe this has to do something. I suspect it has nothing to do with men and women. So it's, maybe now you can see about like housewife. If you see, maybe it's the same thing. No, you see here. Okay, now let's show you like house man instead of housewife. No. Well, again a typo. But it will most likely the, You see, oh well, there's one peak. In the end of the 90s. When Merkel became... Yeah, but you see it's very... It's when Merkel became Chancellor. Any further questions to the talk? Do we have questions for the talk? Because then I would, the signal angel, yeah. How far can we differentiate between change of language in the Bundestag and the change of work methods? It's very difficult to answer because also those who are currently in Berlin, we of course ask those people who are doing those protocols, but the problem is, the parliament's protocols used to be much shorter before. So they did it differently than now. By now they protocol much more, much more exact. And so that's what it seems like. And we don't know more about that unfortunately. For example, if you see about the new spelling reform, that was done at some point. And you can see in the protocols that at this point the new spelling was introduced. And it seems like, as they write very quickly, that sometimes the tradition stayed and they still use the old spelling. So this is sometimes difficult, because they're using a quick way of writing, so Signografie, so that's okay, Signal Angel. Yeah, a couple of interesting correlations. How did you start doing that? Okay, so we just used hundreds of terms through the tool. So you can see suggestions on the bottom. So you have interesting things that seemed interesting to us and worked through all those things. But the question was about correlations between different terms. But there is no correlation. We just see similar curves. We didn't calculate anything. And we did this automatically. What could be interesting graphs. And some of those suggestions on the bottom come from this. Microphone. What is the larger problem? Extremism or right-wing extremism? Well, I don't know if the mentions in the parliament really can answer this question. Okay, but I want to know what the parliament is more interested about. Maybe if you have even a change from radicalism to extremism as a word. So do you see some of those? So now again they have to use the tool. I don't see anything. Yeah, now they are on the right slide. No, on the right window. Okay, so radicalism versus extremism. What was it? Left extremism and right extremism. Yeah, now they put in left extremism and right extremism. But I think the question was about radicalism versus extremism. But whatever. Okay, you see. And if you use terror as a whole. So terrorism is like bigger. And now you have radicalism. Left radicalism versus right radicalism. Let's see if there is a difference. Yeah, there is radicalism. It's rather very few mentions only and now you're checking for the right radicalism. Yeah, it's also 421 a bit more. So you see it's a lot more right radicalism used as a word. So again now microphone 4, but please a question. There is no question. Okay, microphone number 7. You showed that a lot of themes were older than the people present here in the public. Sorry, I'm very different to read, to listen. What's the median age? Okay, so they just said 42. Now they think that you see it's good that you have the same topics. Yeah, you see that the parliament is talking about the topics the people also talk about, so which is actually not bad. So the parliament is like representing what is moving people and that's what it should do. And on the other hand, just because a debate has been done already, this definitely doesn't mean that it has been solved. And so you have to re, well, discuss it and reevaluate it. And looking at climate, before that they talked about environment which is very local, it's German forest, German soil, German water. Now we talk about climate, which is really better because it means we've realized that what we do doesn't just affect our immediate environment but really the whole planet and that's good. I don't know if that really answers the questions. Thanks. I think that's it with questions. End of time. So, big applause again for this great talk. Thanks. Okay, so this is goodbye.