 Well, on behalf of many researchers who are involved in the project, I'd like to welcome you to the room today and tell you a little about what the project is about. Well, okay, I came for that, and I started the project. We thought that we needed to have an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the problems of modern city. And in particular, that we needed to have a focus on the relationship between social sciences and concrete planning. That is, between visual and social, between architects, planners, engineers, economists, sociologists, anthropologists. That is the DNA, if you like, of the urban age. It looks at the relationship between social and visual with a practical view of mind, which is to make better decisions to serve physical needs and also to use people who live in them. That is a project, a simple project in a way. We want to say that this project could never have been done without the amazing team assembled by Richard Dett. It doesn't like the comparisons, I would say. Anything more about this amazing team is amazing. And also, this is a very efficient thing, which is embarrassed by Richard Dett. I would like to thank, in particular here, Paul K. Milman and his team for building and raising this setting in which we are, which mimics the same setting that we have in the lift. Very grateful to be here today. When the urban age started, it was a time of turbo growth. Cities like Mumbai, Shanghai were growing at rates that actually had a very little precedent in the history of urban development. And the discussions we had as a group focused on a part of tarnistness and how to grow. And also, of course, how to be part of it. In the last year, the urban age focus has had to change because the global economy has rapidly transformed the fortunes of cities. A gift that America has made to contemporary civilization is the subprime mortgage. And we are today living in cities with the consequences of this gift, which means that growth will be much slower, that access to resources will be much more different. The urban age needs to mean a change in two ways. One of them is that in the future, we have to focus more on the questions of labor and employment that we have in the past. Most of the cities that we visited by the exception, perhaps, of the living have been cities that couldn't find enough workers to match their work. Today and in the future, we will see a difference in the situation. And secondly, it has been proven to the subject of this conference that the resources available for development are only focuses on smaller projects, more intimate projects. Projects that are local rather than metrical scale because that's all we really have. And in my view, this is an opportunity because it's not limited. It means that focusing on a smaller scale means we can also be more inclusive of local populations and much further development in the past decade. We put an enormous emphasis in the design of this conference on the question of intervention, which really saves the subject of the second decade. And it would all have a chance to discuss with you and ask questions about how we re-tool the growth of cities for an era in which resources have diminished, looking at this not as a lack, but also as an opportunity. So I hope you enjoyed today's events. It's an amazing opportunity to see myself. And we look forward to learning from you, a city that seems to have the crossroads of questions of strength and growth. So thank you very much for having us to saw how we look forward to a more productive relationship with you.