 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'll move for approval. Thank you, Supervisor Tostruti. Supervisor Glavin. Second. Thank you, Supervisor Glavin. Are there any questions or discussion? Seeing none, please, Cheryl put us in voting mode. You may now vote. Whoops. That motion's approved unanimously as well. That's a technical term. Whoops. Okay, so anybody was wondering. Okay, consideration appointments by the County Administrator. The Airport Advisory Committee, three reappointments. Tom Truster, Stephen Brower, or Bauer, I'm sorry, Daniel Dominguez. Supervisor Glavin. Super... motion to approve. Thank you, Supervisor Glavin. Supervisor Gehring. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will second that motion. Thank you, Supervisor Gehring. Are there any questions or comments? Seeing none, Cheryl put us in voting mode. You may now vote. That motion is approved unanimously. Thank you. Presentations. There are none. Public addresses. There are none. Letters, communications, and announcements. I have three resolutions from Jackson Racine and Washera County Boards of Supervisors urging the state to increase access to and pay for public defenders. We'll receive this for information as we've seen this numerous times and have already dealt with it. So that's all that I have. Thank you, John. County Administrator's report. Hold by the very workers that were there today. So if you're wondering, it could be another board meeting maybe two. They will still need to use the back hatches and then we will have a problem available. And it's looking good. It's going to be a nice enhancement for a courthouse. Started the day on a really positive note. It's one of the great things about work for county government. There are so many good things going on here. And as many of you know, disaster bad things can happen really quickly. Good things take time. And this morning I had a chance to join the Health and Human Services Committee at the Lakeshore Community Health Center. And what an example of good things happening in our community. What a tremendous resource for people in the county. And the county board has some history and partnership with this 2012 actually and one of them are Health and Human Services Director Gail Hinton Steele, our public health officer, worked in collaboration with Kristen Blanchard-Sterms and developed and writing grants to the government. I think we received about $650,000 and were identified as being a community that could establish such a clinic. And the key instance at the time was dental care. Hundreds and hundreds of people were unable to see a dentist. Or if they were, it was a year or something before they could be seen. It is so important to have dental care. So we established a facility, a dental facility that had been left vacant and started serving people immediately. The county board, in addition to providing staff support to write the grant, the county board also provided a grant for dental equipment. So we helped get them started. Fast forward to 2018. And this year to date, the facility has served over 12,000 people in our community. And it's dental as well as mental health. It's really a continuum of care there. And it's tremendous. So I want to thank Supervisor Brian Hoffman and all the members of the Health and Human Services Committee for really a nice morning and wonderful presentation. If you haven't been to the Community Health Center, if you haven't been to Lakeshore, it's on Salmon Avenue. And I strongly encourage you to check it out. It's for everyone in Sheboygan County. And it's a wonderful place. The budget development process is going well. Chairman Bill Gehring, Finance Committee Chair, all the members of the Finance Committee are doing the heavy lifting right now. And I want to compliment Bill and Chairman Wagner and Vice Chairman Koch for their role in development of the budget. We have a well-oiled process here. In fact, it's gotten some accolades now statewide. Chairman Wagner and I were asked to present at the WCA conference next week. And I certainly don't see it as rocket science, but we have a track record of success. And when I say we, that is the secret to our success, collaboration. We have a track record of success. Goals, targets, establishing clear expectations. I think you're the only county in the state. I don't know. But I think you're the only county in the state that has an annual county board leadership form where we drill into our fiscal budget performance, track record, outlook. And it's really been helpful as we kick off the budget process each year. So my compliments to you and for those of you who are attending the WCA conference, don't feel like you need to go to the breakout session that Tom and I'll be providing because you know all about it. But we will be there presenting our budget process, our program evaluation prioritization process, touching on the operational reviews we have done, and frankly talking about the good work of our department heads and team. It's a very positive approach here in collaboration is the key. A component of our annual budget process is the five-year capital plan. And Wendy and her team not only are doing a great job helping pull together the budget, but the five-year capital plan. Wendy and her team really take the lead coordinating that with all the department heads on your desk is an updated sheet that's a little easier to read than the one that was in your emailed agenda packet. And if I could briefly call your attention to that, the finance committee and executive committees have unanimously supported the five-year capital plan. So it's here this evening for your consideration. It's within the budget parameters that we predominantly the finance committee have established to borrow no more than two and a half million a year or five million over a two-year period. It's a self-imposed bonding limitation that's helped us keep our borrowing in line. And we've been successful in working within those parameters unless there's been a special exception like the transportation facility. But what I wanted to draw your attention to is not only has it been well vetted, but there are two amendments that are anticipated this evening. And they've both been highlighted in Packer Gold by Wendy. The aging and disability resource remodel. It was the total project is for 124,500. The property committee has been very supportive of wanting to see this happen sooner rather than later. So veteran service office can consolidate in the aging and disability resource center in the vacated FSA space that's going to happen later this fall. So veteran services will be moving to the aging and disability resource center. We're going to do some remodeling. And for those of you who haven't been in there for a while, it's due. It looks tired. It's a dated area. Where some of the staff are, it was upgraded, but a good port of the building really needs a little attention. So the total project is for 124,500. But the amendment anticipated this evening and supported by the executive committee is to reduce that to 74,500 because we have the other resources through building services through the operating budget from 2017 and 2018. And supported by the property committee. They've already taken action. So that's amendment number one. And there is note of that in your agenda. Amendment number two is not in your agenda for that healthcare centers committee just came up with this last week. Kayla's always looking to help make good things happen at Rocky Null. And just last week, the healthcare centers committee discussed the resident alarms on the doors. And this is a safety enhancement and one that we had built into the five-year capital plan for 2020. It was built in to improve the alarm system on the doors because some of our residents have dementia. They wander. And for their own personal safety, obviously we want to make sure they stay in the facility that they don't wander outside and potentially get hurt. So there's an area of our system that is failing and they were going to do a $30,000 temporary fix on the old system. Rather than do that, the amendment that I believe supervisor Charlie Conrad is going to make this evening is to move that forward to 2019 so we can do it right the first time. And really save $30,000 that otherwise would go into a temporary fix. It has no bearing on the overall five-year capital plan that's still within the five million self-imposed limitations. So those are the two amendments anticipated this evening. Thank you for your attention. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Adam. Okay. Consideration of committee reports, Executive Committee, resolution number 13. Regarding 2019 five-year capital plan, recommendation to adopt as amended. Right. So the first motion I'm looking for is a motion to pass the five-year capital plan as amended by the Executive Committee. Survisor Gehring. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I move to adopt as amended. Thank you, Survisor Gehring. Survisor Weigemann. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'll support that motion. Thank you, Survisor Weigemann. Survisor Conrad. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wish to make a motion to move the rocking all resident alert and security system project from the 2020 project to the 2019 project. Thank you, Survisor Conrad. Survisor Bemis. And I will support that motion. Thank you, Survisor Bemis. So now we're voting on the amendment unless there's any questions first. We're voting on Survisor Conrad's amendment to move that up. Okay. Cheryl needs to have a little minute or two to type that in. Lucky I'm not doing the typing. We'd be here for an hour. Okay. Is there any discussion on Survisor Conrad's amendment? Seeing no lights. Cheryl, if you can put us in voting mode. We'll now be voting on Survisor Conrad's amendment. The motion is approved unanimously. Okay. That was on Survisor Conrad's amendment, obviously. Now we'll be voting on the main motion of approving the five-year capital plan. Is there any discussion on that? Survisor Weigemann first. Did you have a question? Survisor Epping. Did you have a question? Thank you, Chairman Weigemann. My question on voting for the five-year capital plan, these are just plans. If you vote on this and it's not included in, say, the 2019 budget for the appropriate department, is it still going to go through? I mean, if there's a project that you don't necessarily agree with and you don't want to see it go through, regardless of whether or not it does, and you vote to approve the five-year capital plan, does that mean you've got to follow through with that on the budget in the future years that it's included? Is your question, if it's out there a few years, like something 2021 or 2022? Say you got a project that's going to extend two or three years and it's in the five-year capital plan and you don't agree with it if you vote to adopt the budget for the capital plan, does that mean you're voting for the project or not? Okay. I thought that always was part of the... Got your question. We're good. Adam will answer it. Good question, Supervisor Epping. So five-year plan, so it is a plan, this is not the annual budget, so the dollars have not been authorized yet, but the key would be 2019 and 2020. Supervisor Gehring and I met with the Finance Director actually this afternoon to revisit this and walk through it and we'd be looking to bond in January of 2020, December, January of 2020. Wendy, thereabouts, I mean it hasn't been finalized, that'll be discussed with the Finance Committee. So until we bond for some projects that may not be proceeding, but for 2019, those projects, that's going to be part of our annual budget process and the safest way to look at it is right now by supporting this plan. You are supporting 2019 and 2020 because those are going to be bonded dollars for two years. We're going to be moving forward with those unless there's some objection or something happens before we bond. And then when you look at 21, 22, 23, those will be revisited annually as we revisit the five-year capital plan. Okay, Supervisor Epping. We can make sure I'm clearing what I'm doing here. If I don't like the project, I've got to vote against the whole capital plan just based on one project, right? You could do that or make an amendment. Go ahead, Adam. As the Chairman said, you can make an amendment just as what was done now to refine the plan. You could make an amendment to refine any aspect of the plan. Now's the opportunity to make changes if the Board so inclined. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to make an amendment to this in that I believe, and first of all, make the amendment that the Customs Facility and Welcome Center for a total of $1,590,000 be taken out of this five-year capital plan. And let me give you my reasoning why. As you know, I am a pilot, and I have visited 46 of the 186 public airports in Wisconsin. I have visited airports all over the world. I am a flight instructor. As you know, I'm well immersed with flying, and quite frankly, I don't think this facility is needed. I think the only one that really would have a good use for this facility would be the Kohler Company. Several airports in Wisconsin that I have visited, Eau Claire being one, have built terminals that are largely standing empty. Unfortunate, but true. You've got to remember, too, if we build this thing, now we've got to maintain it and staff it. That's a lot of money. I and two partners ran the new Holstein Airport for a year and a half, and I went to several seminars on airport management, and I got somewhat of an idea. A complete expert, but I got a somewhat of an idea. What kind of an airport needs what kind of a facility? Like I said, I've been a plane owner and pilot for 35 years. I was at the rollout at finance of the plants, and they look really good, okay? But I think there's a couple of glitches in them. For example, I think their projections on fuel sales, where the county makes a lot of its money, are way too high, way too high. I think we have a better place to put our money. Budgets are tight. We are up 2% this year. I think this would not be a necessity, but a luxury. We are stewards of the taxpayers' dollars, federal, state, and local. Yeah, I've heard the argument most of it's federal and state, but that doesn't matter. It still comes out of our pockets. So I'm going to ask you to consider removing us, because I think we're rushing into this thing, and I frankly don't think we need it for one or two times a year. That is my honest opinion. And I'm not grinding an axe. I'm not mad at any company or anybody else. I've done a lot of research on this, and this is what I really believe. Thank you. Is there a second to that? No, actually I had a question. I kind of need a second before we go any further. Is there a second to that motion? I'll second for the sake of being able to talk then. It's been seconded. You want to speak now? I admittedly know very little about airports. I try to avoid them. I like to drive every place. But I see it says Customs Facility. I assume are we required because of international status? So it seems to me we have now, are we required to have a customs area? That would be my first question. And secondly, I notice that this is scheduled for 2019. How much does that have to do with the probable influx of money we're going to have in 2020 with a very major golf tournament? Okay, a couple questions there. Adam, you want to? Thank you, Mr. Chairman. No, we're not required to have a customs facility. Though those that utilize it now would have to go up to Green Bay or down to Racine or to Appleton. I believe they have a customs facility. So from a standpoint of the Kohler Company, since Supervisor Hoffman mentioned the Kohler Company, yes, they support the establishment of the customs facility and they have also offered to pay for the, to staff it. The state is predominantly offered to pay for it. So when our largest employer is looking for an enhancement to the airport, I can assure you we listen. Charles Sweet and Greg have also been intimately involved with this and they're not the only company that has an interest in seeing a customs facility. Though you're correct, they would be the predominant user. But there are other companies as well. And then finally as we become more of a tourist destination and people come around the world and come to activities like the Ryder Cup, a customs facility is good. In fact, it's good for fuel sales because we'd rather have fuel sales happening here rather than at other airports that offer customs facility. So no, it's not required. But yes, there is strong support from it from at least one major employer. As for timing, we are involved in discussions right now with both the state and federal representatives to see if we can get this built as soon as possible, hoping that it will be available when the Ryder Cup occurs. So there is a lot of momentum behind it. And finally, I don't think we're rushing anything because this was in the last five-year capital plan. As you can see, there's a donation project status. Is it new? Is it a continuation? Was it previously included? This was included previously. So this is not the first time we're talking about a customs facility and a welcome center. As to the welcome center, we're currently in discussions with representatives of the Heritage Board about whether or not their facility could ultimately become a welcome center or not. We don't know how that's going to end up. But what we have been able to tell them, thus far, in negotiations is that the county board has supported this previously as part of the five-year capital plan. And this year, the Transportation Committee, Finance Committee, and Executive Committee continued to support including this in the five-year plan. So that's been a basis of us entering into discussions with them. So with all due respect, though I certainly appreciate there's differences of opinion on this, from a staff perspective, we'd like to see it continue to be supported so we can continue to have these discussions with the state as well as the private sector to see what we can do to further enhance our airport. Okay, thank you, Adam. Supervisor Epping. Thank you, Chairman Wigner. I was going to second that motion, but I do have a question. Is there a projected amount of people that are going to be using the customs facility if we have it? Do we have any idea how much it's going to be used versus asking them to go to another place for their customs work and then coming here? I don't know if we have any number on that, Adam. Do we have any number? I'm looking at our transportation. I mean, if it's going to be one person that checks into the customs. No, Greg, Charles, just historically, when I started, Chuck Mayer was the airport manager and the county board and the state, we've put, I think, 25, 30 million dollars of enhancements in our airport runways, infrastructure over the last two decades. We have a jewel of an airport and it supports our business community and as we can continue to grow and as our economy continues to improve, when we hear from major employers that they like to see further enhancements such as a customs facility and they're willing to pay to staff it and we have the State Bureau of Aeronautics willing to pay most of the dollars necessary to build it, I think it's a good addition for our community and for the airport. Thank you, Greg. Thank you, Adam. Supervisor Offen, did you want to say something again? Yes, I did. There's a hitch in this argument though. A lot of these people that are coming into Sheboygan will have already been through customs at the larger airports, be they Milwaukee, Chicago, New York, wherever the point of entry is. So they don't have to go through customs in Sheboygan if they're coming from overseas or Mexico or Canada. So there's a fallacious argument there and, you know, I've been squawking about this as you probably know, this isn't the first time I've raised this issue. I raised it last year and was told, more or less, to wait till this year and see what's going on. And I've been squawking against this. So I was one of the lone voices a while back that advised some people at Lakeland College don't get involved in a flight school. It is a tricky thing to make money on. You want to make money on a flight school? Start with $2 million. Wait a year, you'll be down to a million. Wait another year, you'll be broke. And Lakeland now, as you know, is pulling out of the flight school business. So, you know, I don't think we've researched this enough, either, this airport business. I really don't. So that's my opinion and that's why I'm making this motion. Thank you, Sir Reza Hoffman. Thank you. You're welcome. Sir Reza Nelson. Well, I really don't know about the amount of use being done right now at the airport, but I did listen to Mr. Sweet's presentation very carefully and what impressed me most about that presentation was the fact that right now we're losing potential revenue because planes, a lot of people don't come want to go to the big airports so they fly into the scene, for instance, and then gas up when they go through customs that were seen and then come up here. And we're not talking about, you know, small planes, we're talking about citations and layers and all that stuff. And so from what I understood from Mr. Sweet's discussions was starting from the get-go, we'll see an increase in revenues because of the fact that these private planes don't want to land in New York or Chicago. They want to land at a small airport with lower landing fees, that sort of thing. And then the gas up there. And the hope is that we capture that revenue than other airports of our size or slightly smaller. Thank you, Surveyser Nelson. Surveyser Hoffman? Your third time. You're on. Henry, I appreciate your argument, though, but the really big planes that haul a lot of people and come into the big airports can't land on a 6,000-foot runway here at Sheboygan. So they will go through customs at New York, you know, or wherever they're coming in. So I don't really see a big need. I think the projections are not there to support this. And that's my professional opinion. Thank you. Thank you, Surveyser Hoffman. Surveyser Epping. Thank you again. I guess I'm wondering as in any project, you build a big project, you have your basic cost, but then it's always your operating fees and costs that seem to really hit the pocket about the worst. If I heard Adam speak correct, we're going to be reimbursed for the initial cost of it plus reimbursed for operating fees and how long is that going to last and am I correct in what I'm assuming I heard? Go ahead, Adam. All is in discussion and that is what we've been told by a representative of the Coler Company that they have an interest in seeing customs facility. I think we have it writing, do we not, Greg? I thought so as well. And that they are willing to cover the staff costs associated with it. So that gives us a lot of momentum to proceed with seeing if we can get this asset to the airport. Thank you. Supervisor Oje. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess from my point of view, first I want to say I'm not going to vote for this amendment. I just want to make that clear because I was one who seconded it. But we're in a state right now where we have more job openings than we have people to fill them and we have a very large employer who wants this who probably from their point of view needs this. It's foolish to do anything that gives the employer the impression or an excuse to move any jobs any place else. The amount of money we get from the Coler Company through donations, through taxes, through the income taxes of the employees that go into this state, the property taxes because of the people who work there and own homes. This isn't like a company saying we're going to move if you don't do this for us. But the reality in this economy is they do go places where they can get what they need. So that's all I really need to say about that and yes I do work at Coler and no one has said anything to me about this. Thank you, Supervisor Oje. Any other questions or comments on Supervisor Hoffman's amendment ? Seeing no lights, Cheryl, can you put us in voting? You may now vote. It's right on the top. We're voting on the amendment. 6 a.m. 17 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m., 2 a.m. 2 a.m. Thank you Mr. Chairman. plan. Supervisor Otten. Thank you Mr. Chairman. The project of 30707, what is that? Third from the bottom that's listed. Does Wendy have it? Sands stands for storage area network. It's IT computer equipment and storage capability. Thank you, Supervisor Attenants. Thank you, Supervisor. Thank you, Adam. Any other questions? Okay, Cheryl, seeing no more lights, please put it, excuse me. Okay, now this is to adopt Resolution number 13, the five-year capital plan as amendment with those two amendments. Please push I if you're in favor and Nay if you're opposed. And I'll try and remember to do that. 22 I, one Nay. Thank you. Consideration of Committee reports, Finance Committee Resolution number 14. Writing Authorizing Planning Conservation Department to apply for fiscal year 2018 tree planning grant, recommendation to adopt. Supervisor Gehring. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I move for adoption of Resolution number 14. Thank you, Supervisor Gehring. Supervisor Tostrodi. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'll second the motion. Is there any questions or discussion on the motion? Hold on, Jim. Okay. I pressed mine to make a motion, but it never showed. Okay, I didn't see yours at all. I didn't see it either. That's why. Try it again. Just try it again. Okay, push your light on. See if you're in good company tonight. Okay, there we go. Okay, we have a motion and I'm not ignoring anybody. I just try to do the right thing up here. Okay, we have a motion there on the tree planting. Seeing no more lights for discussion, please vote aye or nay. Thank you, General. That was quick. Questions to prove unanimously. Okay, thank you. I'll turn the gavel over to the Vice Chair. Okay, Resolution is introduced. Resolution number 15 from the Finance Committee. Regarding approving standard intergovernmental agreement for 2019 sales tax revenue sharing. Resolution number 15 will go to the Executive Committee. Resolution number 16 from the Transportation Committee. Regarding authorizing county aid for bridge and culvert construction in Mosul, Plymouth, and Sherman. Resolution number 16 will go to the Finance Committee. There are no ordinances introduced. Next item is adjournment. Supervisor Bemas. I move we adjourn. Thank you, Supervisor Bemas. Supervisor Glavin. Second. Very good. We are adjourned.