 Growing up on DTNS, YouTube clamps down on some music monetization, Amazon's choice continues to confuse, and how our digital camera is going to survive the smartphone age. Hello, Friday. This is so good to want to be 19 from Studio Feline. I'm Caroline. It's ArtProv. Friday. I'm Len Peralta. And I'm the show's producer, Roger Chang. We are also lucky enough to be joined by Aunt Pruitt, new host at twit.tv. We didn't have that title for you last time you were on the show, Aunt. Welcome. I appreciate it. Appreciate it. Yeah. Things have changed just slightly, right? That's great though. It's great. Congratulations. And thanks for joining us on this Friday, because I know you got a big road trip to take pretty soon. Yeah. Just a little bit of a road trip. There's only about 2700 miles, I think. Oh, that's nothing. Yeah. You just drive. Just do a straight shot. You know? Don't even need to rest. Well, yeah. Nice pack show today. Len is going to be illustrating throughout the show. We'll check with him at the end of the show to see what he has drawn us. It's always fantastic, so I look forward to that. And also, before the show, if you aren't a patron yet, patreon.com.dtns is where you can go to get our extended show, Good Day Internet. We were talking about cigars and teacher behavior, and, you know, Roger was complaining about something. It was a good time. So, patreon.com.dtns for the wider conversation. But now, let's start with a few type things you should know. The Bluetooth SIG issued a security notice about key negotiation of Bluetooth, also known as a knob attack, which interferes with Bluetooth pairing procedures, shortens the connection's encryption key, and then allows easier brute force techniques to spy on data transfer between devices. Effective devices use Bluetooth, BR, EDR, that's also known as Bluetooth Classic. And knob only works if both connecting devices have the vulnerability. Apple and Microsoft have already rolled up patches, and the Bluetooth core specification now requires a minimum encryption key length. Research firm, Canales, his latest report shows wearables priced between $200 and $299, or $300 to $399, now represent 80% of all shipments, 60% of all shipments, rather. In Q2 of 2019, over 60% of the 4.7 million global Apple Watch shipments went to North America. The 32% bump over the 2018 quarter. And over in shipments, besides Apple Watch, Fitbit was in second place with 1.9 million shipments. Samsung, Garmin, and Fossil made up the rest of the top five, although none of them beat the others category, which shipped 1.3 million units, those are global units. On September 17th and 18th, the European Union's general court will hear challenges from Apple and Ireland in a three-year-old, 13 billion euro tax bill battle. In August of 2016, the European Commission ruled that Apple had on fair advantages and ordered Ireland to recoup that tax sum plus interest. The Irish government has said it profoundly disagrees with the EU's decision. Let's talk a little more about Apple and lawsuits, something that Apple knows quite well. So another Apple lawsuit news today, the company filed one against a mobile device virtualization company, Corellium, which describes itself as the first and only platform that offers not only iOS, but also Android and Linux virtualization on arm. In the southern district of Florida where the lawsuit was filed, Apple accused Corellium of copyright infringement for illegally replicating iOS as well as some iPhone and iPad apps. Apple argues that Corellium posed its virtualization product just as a research tool to help discover security vulnerabilities, but that, quote, Corellium has simply copied everything, the code, the graphical user interface, the icons, all of it in exacting detail. And it seems that Apple has a pretty solid argument here. Is Corellium something that you would never consider using? You ever do any development? If I were into development, I would because I see a place for something like this. But for Apple to say that they flat out copied it, no, I'm wondering, who's the source? How do they get this? Because you can emulate a lot of different things in code, but not necessarily lying for lying the way the original source code may be. So I think that's some pretty bold statements from the Apple council there. Yeah. Well, I mean, for Apple to have done this, they probably have significant evidence, at least to argue, listen, that Corellium has gone too far here. This is something that they would have had to get permission from. You can't just rip off something that we've put together without consulting us at all. Apple's the only company, at least at this point, that's accusing Corellium of this. But I could see other companies jumping on board potentially. I mean, it's Apple's also a huge company with a lot of legal weight behind it. Oh, yeah. Right. So yeah. I mean, it's interesting. And Roger and I were talking before the show that there are a lot of really great reasons that virtualization tools exist. You can test app development. You can look for security flaws. This doesn't necessarily mean that this is not a legitimate product. However, when you cross Apple, you tend to get into hot water pretty quickly. In many respects, Apple will probably win this case if they can prove that the company, Corellium did indeed, didn't even have to steal the whole thing. They just need to have been proved to lift some of it. I think the bigger question is, there is a market for tools like this. Would it be in Apple's interest to rather cooperate and just make a deal with Corellium instead of just trying to sue everything they think is? Because Apple has a tendency to look very poorly on companies that they don't directly control. Exactly. And so it might not be so much of like you're stealing money from us, but you're not in our orbit. So we don't like it. And you're profiting from one of our IPs. You've done it too well. Apple literally called Corellium's virtualization exacting detail almost a compliment. And if they did it from a clean room, you know what? They got some great coders and they could be hired out as OS developers. There you go. The next aqua hire on the table, is that what you're saying? No comment. That's the case. We will revisit it on a future DTNS. But speaking of copyright, another copyright story today, YouTube announced that copyright owners will no longer be able to monetize creator videos that include short, very short or unintentional uses of copyrighted music using YouTube's manual claiming tool. They'll now be able to choose either to try to prevent the other party from monetizing the video themselves or try to block the content. YouTube said in a blog post that aggressive manual claiming of short music clips, quote, can feel particularly unfair as they transfer all revenue from the creator to the claimant, regardless of the amount of music claimed. However, the majority of claims are currently created through YouTube's content ID match system. Anybody who uses YouTube is probably familiar with that, not the manual claiming tool. So this is a minority of folks who are going to be affected. But yeah, it does sound like this was a tool that was being exploited, perhaps unfairly. And I assume you know your way around YouTube. Is this something you've ever come across? I've been flagged a time or two, and it's usually in air. But I like this idea here because it's not necessarily allowing the other folks to capitalize on all of the creator's work. But this system, it's getting better. It's still not great, but it's nice to see that YouTube and Google are trying to, you know, make this a little bit better for the creator side, because that's what it's all about. It's about the creators. Yeah. If you, as an example, if I'm out and about in the world and I see Ant on the street and I decide to interview him and, you know, a car rolls by and the windows are down and there's a song being played and there's nothing I could have done about that. You know, that's, let's say that that video goes really viral and we get 10 million views for somebody saying, well, that song, that was my song playing in that car for two seconds that you heard. Now I want all of the money. That does seem potentially very unfair. So that content creator still, it's not that they have had all of the right strips. They have the right to say, okay, well, this isn't going to work. You know, I, I don't want Sarah to be making money off of that video or that video should be blocked entirely for whatever reason that they might come up with, but not just that my money now gets transferred to that other person. You know, I can see an argument if we're, say, at a concert or what have you, and you have all of these A-list people there and they want to give you an interview just for the heck of it, just because they're, everybody's having a good time and the music's playing in the background, I, I could see it there because that is an event with an artist that's, you know, they're paid from, from their work there. But now, just like if you say it out in public somewhere, just going down the street, you know, I think that's pretty asinine that those claims come in. In, in news over on the East Coast, a federal judge issued a 153 page ruling ordering Georgia officials to stop using the state's current electronic voting machines by the end of the year. That's after municipal elections that are being held in November. Currently, Georgia uses the Diabold AccuVote TSX touchscreen machine. If you're not familiar with it, security research found it to have numerous security vulnerabilities dating back to 2006. There isn't enough evidence, at least according to the researchers that Georgia ever updated the systems and Georgia has somewhat of a notorious past with, with security issues regarding elections and voting. Georgia hopes, it says, to have new ballot marking machines time in place for a presidential primary election, which is happening in March of 2020. However, if it can't meet that deadline and that is likely, the state will be required to use paper ballots. Going back to paper aunt. I mean, it's, it's one of the safer ways to do it, I suppose. It's works. Paper just works. You get your little black ink and you fill it in and the scanner does the rest. It just works. This stuff should, should have been handled a long time ago because this isn't the first time we've heard about these machines being vulnerable to attack. And there's been several demonstrations of just how quickly they can be attacked and overtaken. You would think the different jurisdictions around the country would have taken heed to that and said, you know what? We need to do something about this because we really don't want to screw up our democratic government any more than it already is. Yeah. The RS Technica article that, that kind of laid out many of the issues that the state has had over the last decade plus in detail is really great. You know, a lot of it has to do with it's not just, oh, these voting machines that you can press to, you know, choose your candidate, they're really, you know, made poorly. It has also has to do with the fact that data is being transferred from a computer at a government organization. And that computer might be compromised as well. And then there's some sort of a, a disk that, that, that's transferring malware from it to the voting. There are way too many points of failure where data can either be corrupted, altered or go missing as in the recent Georgia case where they wanted, they wanted the state to cough up the actual election data from, from the voting and it just happened to mysteriously disappear, quote unquote, accidentally erased. The problem is there's no, there's, there's no baseline standard of what's considered an acceptable electronic voting machine. Is it one that also spits out a paper ballot so you can go back and then audit the votes saying like, here's my receipt. This is how I voted. Does the electronic vote match what I, you know, on this paper, there's no, there's no way to kind of audit the entire system to ensure that there is an integrity to it. And, you know, no one has, no one says like, okay, this is, this is how they should all work. Everyone, every state, every state election board can decide what constitutes an acceptable, you know, acceptable system. One would think there'd be plenty of tax dollars to help fund stuff like this, just to get it right. You know what I'm saying? Yeah. It would be. Those tax dollars always seem to go to other things. And, you know, and, you know, it's, it's, it's one of those things that I think it becomes more important as elections become decided by shorter or not smaller and smaller margins, where they go back and they do recounts to see, okay, candidate A1 over candidate B, and we have, you know, approved. Because if, if you remove the, the faith that the population has and the way the votes count and the way the votes are tallied, then you have a problem because then that's when democracy starts breaking down. Well, might be paper ballots for Georgia and March. We will see in just a few short months. Get on it, state. Let's see if you can do it. Amazon's recommended items label that it calls Amazon's choice has drawn many questions about how those products get awarded such a distinction. A pitch deck reviewed by Digidae, which it claims is real, details a 2017 bidding program for the Amazon's choice badge, essentially offering vendors the ability to bid for the badge by lowering their prices, maybe spending more money on advertising, making it attractive to Amazon and the vendor both. This would give the vendor better placement in search results, which as we all know is very important when Amazon is, is, is your marketplace. In response, Amazon tells Digidae the program was never offered, but didn't really elaborate. The source tells Digidae that the bidding program did actually run briefly in 2017, but Amazon then rolled it back and Amazon's choice badges are now driven by algorithms. The company does claim that it awards product listings that have high in stock and conversion rates, high customer ratings, competitive prices and prime shipping. The algorithm sounds like, okay, something that is, is, is created. It's an editor's choice that's created by an algorithm probably makes sense for Amazon because you've got a lot of products to deal with. And I don't know if you've ever bought something that was labeled Amazon's choice that didn't end up seeming like a very great product, but I have. Sadly, I have too. Yeah. So whether or not this program ran where, where companies could, could, could try to bid to be Amazon's choice vendors, which some people are kind of going to go, well, I mean, you bid. And if Amazon doesn't agree, it doesn't mean that you technically get it. But if we're talking like, hey, spend a little bit more money, get a little bit higher placement, then it seems a little bit like a pay-for-play type model. So. Exactly. Even assuming that this never happened, which Amazon says it did not. It does appear that that was something that, that might have been thrown around in a, in a conference room at some point. Do you think though that for a company like Amazon to be awarding labels based on an algorithm, which algorithms often work quite well, but not all the time, um, to the point where people like you and me are getting products sometimes where we're like, this is junk. Why is this happening? You know, is, is, is this the best way to go about it? I'm, I much rather trust the algorithm from Amazon versus this whole pay-for-play thing, um, because Amazon is not the only company potentially guilty of this. They're, uh, you can look up camera of the year, for example, and you'll find six or seven different models of, of camera of the year and sometimes from the same, uh, uh, company that's touting camera of the year. And it's all because of how many times they got their pockets filled up with, Hey, make mine the best, you know, and give me an algorithm. Amazon already does a really good job with algorithms for the most part anyway. Just keep it that way. Yeah. The high customer ratings is always the thing where I go, because I just, I'm so, I'm so hyper aware of how easily that can be gained on lots of platforms. Amazon is certainly one that has seen a lot of that. Um, I, I don't even bother to try to like decipher if I think a bot wrote the five star reviews that take up the top 20 reviews on any product I look at, because it's just so pervasive. But yeah, I agree with you that, that an algorithm, again, it's what, if you, if you're going to do something that's editor's choice, what other option would Amazon really have besides just not having that badge at all? Right. Right. In a press release announcing a new Disney and Charter Communications distribution deal for Hulu, ESPN plus and Disney plus, the two companies have agreed to work together on piracy mitigation, including implementing business rules and techniques to address such issues as unauthorized access and password sharing. Tantan. No details about how those measures would be implemented were mentioned. Our technical notes that Charter CEO Tom Rutledge has complained about account sharing before criticizing TV networks for not locking down content well enough and that password sharing leads to lower numbers of cable TV subscribers. All right. Well, none of us do things like this, but if we did hypothetically, uh, it sounds as though, uh, uh, you know, Disney's is worried, uh, Disney's worried that it has probably seen enough evidence that if I have a subscription and I share my password with you and then maybe I'm keeping you from giving the money that, that the company feels is rightfully there's a view having your own subscription. But how, how does it get enforced? That could be really, really hard to track down with when if people are savvy enough to think about that because you have VPN usage and people figure out ways to block MAC addresses and then you have people that are turning off location and things of that nature. The people that are already pirate in this stuff, they're pretty clever. So I think ESPN and Disney and all of those folks are just gearing themselves up for a game of whack-a-mole. And, you know, and it's weird because Netflix has the same issue, but they honestly don't really care because ultimately more eyeballs mean more eyeballs than that. At some point, those people eventually turn into customers. They do sign up for the cheapest package and some money is better than no money. The other thing is the simplest way is just, you know, to block it is to have a system where if someone's watching your Disney Plus, whatever Hulu Plus stream, you don't allow a second one, right? Someone signs in with Roger Chang and he's watching. No one else can sign in until I'm done watching. And it's not like they charge you on the amount you watch, right? You pay the 16 bucks. It's for the month. Didn't say you can only watch seven hours a day, 17 hours a day or 24 hours a day. So if I'm done and no one else is using it, why not let someone else watch? Yeah, if you've got a big enough household where you might have somebody watching something else in the other room, there might be concurrent streams that could be happening within the same IP address. It's limited to three. You won't have to worry about geographic, you know, hurting. Like, oh, you can only watch in the Bay Area or you can only watch, you know, in and around Denver or which is what YouTube TV does fairly well, because I've tested the system. Can't have a family member in Arizona. Whoops, but my mom and I actually ran into this, not with Charter. She has Direct TV that she uses for her TV service and she lives on the other side of California for me. And a couple of times when she visited, we just logged into her Direct TV account from my Apple TV app and we were like, great, this is awesome, you know, because I don't have cable. And the last couple of times we had all these issues and she finally got on the phone with them because we thought, I don't know, there's just some tech thing going on. Like we're not getting the username right or something's going on. Right. And they said, no, no, no, no, you can't do that. You have to be within your own Wi-Fi network. And she was like, well, then what's the use? You know, like I'm paying for this and it's a pretty penny. It's over a hundred bucks a month. And I can't travel and like watch TV in my iPad. And they were like, no. And obviously the company did that for this exact same reason that they're like, you we rather restrict your own account to make sure that you're not going to just share that password with Sarah when you're not visiting. Anyway, yeah, the piracy war wages on we will prevail. Now I'm just getting to get all the tech headlines each day in about five minutes. Subscribe to daily tech headlines dot com. So and I'm really excited that you're on the show today because we're going to talk about digital cameras or perhaps the fall of digital cameras, which has been happening for a while. Digital camera market declined about 80 percent to 19 million unit sales in 2018 versus more than four hundred million dollars in smartphone sales sold globally in the same year. If you look at Japan specifically, which is historically had a very robust digital camera market, eight digital camera makers of eight digital camera makers, only Sony only Sony saw profit growth in the most recent annual period, and that was largely not from digital camera sales, but the sensors that Samsung has been making for smartphones that's helping it do quite well. Digital cam companies have had to evolve. And if you look at some of the others, Nikon now gets over half of its business from selling to other companies, not consumers. Fujifilm has has been playing around with somewhat novelty and kind of nostalgia at hybrid cameras. They've got one called the Instax mini Lee play hybrid camera. So it's digital images, but it also is kind of a Polaroid style print out image kind of thing. Taylor Swift did a limited release of a similar model last year and sold 10 million units, which is a big part of the entire global market of 2018. Fujifilm is now selling black and white film again after discontinuing it last year. And Canon still has, if you look at Japan again, over 60 percent of the share or just under 60 percent of the share of DSLRs, but again, putting a lot of R&D money into video, AK video cameras that are highly compatible with 5G networks, the future, the future beyond. So when you when you look at the digital camera market and and where these huge companies who are at the top of the game have have have begun to shift and have have have really been struggling to to to actually be profitable anymore in this market. Why do you see it going? I think it's a couple of things and it sort of reminds me of the iPhone and the troubles that they that they used to have far as getting more sales. People didn't need to buy them as often because they just worked. And now you're talking about a physical DSLR that's not as easy to carry around as a camera. They're going to look back at the camera that they have and say, you know what, this is just good enough. It's doing everything that I need. I don't necessarily need to update, upgrade or what have you. But there's still always that niche, you know, where Canon can eventually come around and make their mirrorless side of it a little more more fascinating for consumers other than professionals. And that could boost sales. They've tried it with this EOS RP, the big time professionals hate that camera, but that camera is not for them. And Canon gets that, you know, Canon's taken a lot of heat, but they understand that that camera is going to reach more for those folks carrying the smartphone around that says, man, I really wish I had a real camera with me today so I can take this shot. There are so many times that I've been approached on social media with people saying, you know, I should probably go buy a real camera instead of using my phone because every now and in regular Joe's, if you will, they just like to take nice standard shots outside or wherever they are. That's not all blurry from the smartphone. Yes, phone cameras are great. They are really, really good. But sometimes you can really capture that memory with a nice larger crop sensor and store it somewhere, get it printed without it having any type of pixelation or anything like that. It's I mean, it's it's a very interesting market because if you want to if you want to see what's happening, I'm going to pull up this chart of basically where the the graph of where the market is. It's the digital camera market is actually dropping back to where it was before digital cameras were were a thing. And a lot of that has to do with smartphone. Now, it's not just image quality. It's the fact that it's connected, right? I want to get that pick of me and Grandma at the Grand Canyon on Facebook. How am I going to do that from a DSLR? I got to, you know, load it in on my computer and then send it out that way or have some sort of wires connection. Convenience factor on smartphones is tremendous as is the ability to quickly add whatever you want, you know, onto your social media networks. And that's kind of been the conundrum for a lot of these companies, you know, Canon, Nikon, Sony have all implemented some sort of feature to upload, if not directly, just faster getting those photos off. And there's a camera. And, you know, part of it is cameras have been engineered from from a very camera-centric point of view. I mean, a photographer point of view. In other words, it was designed for a very prosumer, enthusiast, professional mindset. A lot of people just want to take pictures by pressing a button, not worry about aperture, shutter speed, how well I'm holding the picture. They just want it done for them, which is why so many smartphone companies have been implementing some sort of post processing feature because although the sensors are smaller, you can do so much more with the smartphone and post processing after the fact. Where I see the market going is that there has to be some of these companies that fall out or switch over entirely to a different product, whether it's software only or if it's lenses or if it's some sort of hybrid. Canon, Sony and and Panasonic have been, you know, been pretty well known for implementing video, video camera features in their DSLRs and their camera lenses. And having a hybrid is great because then people kill two birds with one stone, they can take advantage of the same awesome lens set that they use for still photos and use it for video. At the same time, they don't feel like they're just blowing money and it's just sitting on the shelf gathering dust until they go to Aruba or Hawaii for their annual vacation. The other factor is a lot of creators are getting in on on that. They realize that shooting their weekly vlog or whatever on their smartphone handy, but doesn't look as great, especially with the field of credit as it is. And so a lot of their moving to video DSLR. Shannon does a lot of her work on her Sony Alpha video. Neuralist interchangeable lens. Can I hate that name? So complicated for a category. But they really have to think out of the box, right? It's like when German automobile makers were having a really tough time trying to come up with an electric car and then here comes along Elon Musk and pumps one out first a roadster, then a then a performance sedan and the SUV because they have been coming from the engineers mindset. And so they they're kind of in a in a walled garden where they can't see outside of the box. And that's kind of where they need to be. And I don't see that. You know, I actually expect to see more bloodletting as a lot of these consumer markets that they used to rely on to make so much of their money is just diminishing because people it's like, you know what, you know, the old photographer adage is the best camera to have is the one that's on you all the time, which is it tends to be your smartphone. I still think that these manufacturers can play the long game and and do what Canon is doing with that EOS RP. I have it back there. I have a review unit and I'll say firsthand, it's not the best camera. It's not. But I could put my hat on as if I'm like my great uncle or someone that loves to take photos and replace that camera that he's currently using. I think he uses like an old rebel or something. He would love this camera. I mean, it would blow it would blow him away. It would give him a little more detail and would give him a few more features and specs and so forth. And he would keep that for years. You know, if they could marry the functionality of a smartphone that you just dock with a lens and a sensor, you leave all the intelligence, the phone, the phone can process it. The phone can send it to your parents. It can send it to Facebook, send it to Twitter for you. I think that would make a lot of sense because, you know, a lot of, you know, any photographer knows more than half of what you pay for cameras in the glass, the lenses, right? Lens. Lens and then, you know, the sensors get upgraded. It's great. You can ditch the body, get a new one. But, you know, if you can marry those two and they've tried with not so much great success because they've always ended kind of. Yeah. But I think that's that's the ultimate marriage is that he can marry that to a smartphone without feeling that they need to do all of it, right? We need to have this firmware we need at the sensor. We have the wireless we need all of it in the complete package and it's just an accessory like everything else. Yeah. I can tell you, I have a Canon EOS R, the grown up version of the RP and I've been using it for a while now and between this and my ADD, any time I go out to a sporting event for my kids or whatever else, everybody wants to take pictures with their phones. But as soon as the game is over, they're all coming to me asking if they can get a copy of my pictures. Looking at your genius is there. But the fidelity is still resides in these. And I think that's where the you're right. We went for a period where everybody wanted the digital camera because they were just great and you could do so much. But now it's getting to be where everybody has a an OK camera in their pocket. But when it comes down to the fidelity and just the features in the pictures you can get, especially action shots, the I think I really think the SLR that the SLR are are here to stay. They just may become more niche and that's fine with me as a camera enthusiast. I'm fine with that. There are some people that still want to print photographs to put on the wall in the homes. I'm a person who wants to do that. So nine times out of 10, they're going to look to me or look for for aim. Sure. What would you grab because I want to put this up as a memory in the in the game room or something, you know. Well, thanks to everybody who participates in our sub Reddit. You can submit stories. Maybe they're about digital cameras. Maybe they're about something else and vote on them at DailyTechNewShow.Reddit.com. We will not make you use paper ballots. We're also on Facebook, Facebook.com, slash groups, slash daily tech news show. All right, let's check in with Len Peralta, who has been drawn up a storm this entire show. Len, what do you got for us today? Well, you know, I have just had this problem with digital cameras this week. I visited the Jim Henson exhibit and I wanted to take really great pictures, but I also wanted to share them immediately. And this is my take on the the the I don't want to say it's a death of the digital camera market, but let's just you did use a gravestone. I did gravestone and it's a it's a millennial in front of it posing as a selfie. Duck lips. Wow. Yeah. Yeah. She's done it all. And the bikini. Yeah. There you go. So so yes. So if you are interested in this image, this is available on my Patreon. Right now, if you're a Patreon subscriber, Patreon.com or at my online store, very cool. Thank you, Len. And by the way, the last person to speak on our wonderful digital camera discussion was Amos, who I didn't introduce at the beginning of the show, but I'm glad you jumped in Amos. Also, thanks to and Pruitt for being with us today and where can folks keep up with all of your fabulous work digital camera and otherwise? Check me out over on Instagram at Ant underscore Pruitt. Very cool. You know who gets the DTNS choice label? It's real. Yes, it's not chosen from an algorithm or anything. Our patrons, you can become a DTNS member and get ad free RSS feeds, extra content each week, bonus episodes of the show and a lot more. Sign up at patreon.com slash DTNS. If you've got feedback for us, we'd love to hear it. Our email address is feedback at dailytechnewshow.com. We're also live Monday through Friday, 4 30 p.m. Eastern 2030 UTC. Find out more at dailytechnewshow.com slash live and we'll see everyone on Monday. This show is part of the Frog Pants Network. Get more shows like this at frogpants.com. Diamond Club hopes you have enjoyed this program.