 We have your presentation on the screen, but we also see what you see. This is not so important. That's fine. Okay, thank you. And good morning. We have a much colder place. So, we have this video presentation. We have not achieved also what could be done in the future. Of course, what I didn't talk about is the working with move 1. This is what the new model of understanding the local task form and this process. And it concerns the framework. Achievements in size. It has been established together with Genitry. So, here we go. Let me see if I can change the screen. Yeah, that works. So, here is the context, the achievements. Think about the simulation, list of words, and geo-convolutions. And then some ideas for outreach. It's always good to try to remember where things come from. It was actually conceived already some years ago. During the Scottish League, the Joint Committee on Stop and Safety. I cannot remember exactly, but I think we must have started in 2013. And we started writing sometime in 2014. And the MOU, which was finally the basis for our project and the project proposal, was really a joint achievement by many members of the Joint Committee on Stop and Safety. And what we had in mind, from the side of the Joint Committee on Stop and Safety, was the status I should have for making decisions on how to utilize information which can be collected from structures. The context of what is the main focus of the Joint Committee at the time, mainly the context of safety and integrity management of structures, and building by, in reality, right? We wanted to make sure to exchange knowledge and experiences with experts working in the new decision analysis in terms to venue the structural health monitoring. And also, the Joint Committee on Stop and Safety, on how to make the health monitoring in practice. And of course, it's always a contribute to a broader destination of students and professionals working in the field. And as we all know, it's successful, and this is a very, very good achievement of the people involved. So we need to remember that without mentioning all the names to make this possible. All those accomplishments to develop in the process. We're going to do one of the responsibilities. It was stated that we want to unify and clarify the theory in view of its application in the context of structural health monitoring. And we wanted to identify and formulate the idea of information problems based on world indications. In a process of experts, we should build a platform for further research and developments in the field for the future. And we also specified milestones. And of course, the milestones, I'm hoping that we're looking back to see how far do we go. Did we actually achieve what we wanted from the beginning? And we have a few detail-related framework, such as the dissemination and evaluation of international conferences, spatial section and organization, and conferences and workshops. And we provide a summary, and we say that we want to publish this on our website at the end of the project. So let's have a look at how far do we become. With respect to the personality of the post-action. And the methodology began at the end of that time. We moved one, task one, with respect to it. So we made the umbrella of the loop for regularly the performance of structures over there, services like that. We also had the point of the case-artists to show how to use data and approaches in data and context. We used very completely covering what we provided in this post-action. They had, for some time, different contexts, with different ground-breaking on these aspects. But what we had on this, we had identified and completed the frameworks in the data context of how to do this monitoring or integrity management. And we had a lot of hard work for all of us, and we had a high degree of confidence on what kind of information that is actually used in the context of the project. This is the main one, we are focusing on the outcomes of this project. We have a platform that makes a significant, more efficient future work in the area. Again, we had an opportunity before the project started. These situations or contexts where there is a lot of information in the software that is going to provide, as well as some changes, formulated as in the morning and nature is to allow for a lot of information in situations where the structure is consistent. They are all just due to a complicated damage on the future against the form on the line. So this, I would say, this is one of the main areas where our populations, our frameworks, are quite on this side of the page. There, of course, also, for what concerns the optimization of main percentages for the structure, we have had a lot of contributions in this direction in the action and a lot of focus on formulating this particular type of information. And you see the structures in the action for this type of the project here. And found the energy or the energy maybe we have too much to do in the action, I don't know why I said that. But we are very focused on the structure and the design also. In fact, to collaborate with the board section 14.06, this concerns the quality management of the building of infrastructure. In 2016, we have had a meeting area and we approach the whole thing that needs to last mention the education range for a lot of information in these countries. So some countries should be able to act with a kind of basis where they can force the info about the various types of the services. And not only also the specific services because when it comes to the implementation of the project, we also have to appreciate that there can be interpretations of possible different competing services. So we observe something that not many people associate when we observe with pessimistic the services that we have online, but we do appreciate to explain what we have observed and we have included this in the way we are modeling systems. Also, we can make approaches of more or more approach, but we also need to look at top-down approaches to systems that are modeling. We have the same scenario, this is actually an example, in the same logic that was made in your notes and then in our form. We have top-down in our notes. The only reason that the system models also account for the responsibility that they are in the systems is in between what we observe from the monitoring and we have formulated decision problems and also included terms like options and as is where we go in time, the buy options, this is what we do when we are planning and for correction of the information and using the approach of the monitoring. And we have formulated the optimization problems to the state of the information and what we do here is in the style of formulations we have been at the normal biotech analysis where we have the possibility to see that there are some systems. To be honest, we all promised that this one will be modeled as publicity and here we put that on the envelope of the information analysis. So, I think now as we know, is there a me and a whole and that's quite good. The team has in the dimension of discrimination and to be clear with the conference papers mainly in the 60s and 60s and international conferences and also a large amount of the tax sheets which are also available more on the one page conducted in short scientific research both with the purpose to engage the young researchers but also as we have seen in several cases both of the researchers have wanted to be able to get into the methods of training of information and the system. That is also going to be a significant to the to the network and of precisely the sectors in this construction that are very similar to the network between peers working on the same interest which is fantastic. It's a little bit difficult to resort to the discrimination of course specifically to the legal working groups which are in the section here in the building one of the leaders of the instruments with the one instrument particularly the mariachi always dealing with the new methods via very very little in all of the information and in the community also. So a big congratulations to all of you on this. With respect to how to wrap it up focus on working with one the way as to develop some sort of animation on control now what am I talking about the one purpose is to impress the professionals people with the same thing of the concept of regular information to produce the monitoring but the shortest possible is the physical in the area for the storytelling around our framework for regular information and instance to talk about this monitoring let's say the COF based models for monitoring information of the indicators which we are using in our analysis and in which are and we are doing regular information as a simple example from the indigenous management but also for AIMM and that means you allow for to understand the COF which should be possible for the same concept from such a document such a document as very low education from Donnie's which contributes to such a document but he has not yet and such a document they say with the design of shoes so I think such good documents are still missing the first one I think what we should do is we should and then make sure that that document is finalized there then they are produced so I think this is an understanding easily that we are working on what we should do the first action is that the concept seems difficult to grasp is that for the same things and that adds that adds to the science to work on so we need to change the area so this is the future and the structure that is coming so our purpose is to make sure that the structure which we are which we want to monitor for which we want to understand the range of information which can be created by so we have a very strong focus on the information of a children and people with the marks of the software performances and also the understanding of the information which can be created by this out force there is a much much bigger context which is hard to grasp and this is the entire context of the decision process around the software and technology management and I think for the future we need to address the context and the information management in this context much more and one thing that we should hear is I would like to focus on is the gap which we also talked about in the discussion so the gap is being based on experts on how to use software that is modifying these versions to the owners of these structures on the buildings on the other rails on the structures on buildings and then on the next to be done so we had a lot of assumptions on how to create the information and what to do with the correct information how that supports the technology management and how that is going to be done and there the reality is very very thin of not difference for many of the reasons there is an example but also other reasons negatives for instance or the same personal negatives or other issues we don't see the reality but the tendency between our and what is being done and in order to be to the technology management we need to understand the gap we also need to take into account the strategies that we are focusing on seeing from a so surely we want to continue to the level of global systems and here we use the new data analysis to try to understand the understanding of circumstances between actual banks and the structure of this money and and also I also want to point out the data mining with the building and the performance of the performance of structures and also we want to take into account the data numbers of structures of categories of structures in the context of code and codification I think as I indicated a few times that we set out to the obvious when we completed the project we didn't have the same level of data mining in the way we looked at the data of information analysis in the context of this money coming actually right now we did not realize what could be done in all the corners of the community the question surely more dynamic than high definitions as I mentioned we changed the concept and finding common understanding of our accounts because currently there should be operations procedures procedures which can actually be used as we focus this other much more in the other I think that not least the recent place where we had the data and the point where the most complex achievements mainly actually contribute to the same and also the aspects where we need to work more to ensure that the money for the data can be taken to management is accounted for what is to be made and that brings to the final slide in the outreach and my position is that we we were able to choose partners which could work after the finalization of our post-action and raise the choice of the post-action into the younger community on social safety so that we may ensure that the choice could be made in that both are made to launch a concerted evaluation but we also to come to see the other organizations of Europe and this task group that we have chosen should also lead up that call that ends and immediately in the ongoing discussions on how to and should intervene to the advice of the younger groups and then where the broader neighborhood side I think it would be relevant for instance to consider a project for the education of PhD students bringing to the community to technology and so on the all this platform doing that the side course would scheme for small incisions using the concept of annual information and so on as the main vehicles of the technology so thanks for your attention and information which was spent it should be in the interview despite the low quality of the sound and maybe also of the living quality of the speaker thank you