 Fy glwnaeth y trafodi沒事 yng Nghymru. Felly, yn gwael i ddim yn wirthgurff fel Rhyf'r Rhyw Llyfr Hôl yn yng structures, yn yluodol, ac yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn y Llyfr Hôl, yn y Llyfr Heliwyh Llyfr Hôl, yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn y Llyfr Heliwyr yr Aelodau Biddrug, yn yr Aelodau Llyfr Heliwyr yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn y Llyfr Heliwyr, yn osud, yn yr Aelodau Biddrug, yn y Llyfr conservation number 2, order 2021, urgent continuation order 2022, SSI 2020, slash 39, and I refer members to paper 1 and 3. No motion to another instrument has been lodged. Does any member have any comment on this instrument? Could you please raise your hand, or if you're remote, please type R in the chat box. Go ahead, Mercedes. Thank you. You might be getting some feedback. I can hear a bit of an echo, sorry. It was just a comment about the type of fishing that's been restricted. I understand that, when the Government announced their public consultation on the proposals, they have confirmed that hand-diving for scallops will no longer be prohibited, but creeling will still be prohibited, along with dredging and trawling. I wondered if we could seek some clarification from the minister as to why those different types of fishing have been treated the same way, despite the fact that the Scottish Government categorises dredging as severe, whereas creeling is lower impact. I know previously that they have said that they want to take a precautionary approach, but then they chose the smaller of two possible boundary areas. I'm just confused as to whether it's precautionary or not, because it seems that, within the smaller boundary, everything will be prohibited. Outside the boundary, everything is allowed when we have different types of fishing with different impact levels. If we could seek some clarity from the minister as to why they have been categorised in the same way, I'd be grateful. Thank you, Mercedes. The committee can certainly ask the cabinet secretary for clarification on the scientific evidence. Rachael Hamilton. We'll make sure that we're right for clarification. Are members content to note the instrument? Our second item of business today is consideration of the Organic Derogation Amendments Regulations 2022, and I refer members to papers 2 and 3 from page 8. Under the protocol between the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government, the consent notification has been categorised as type 1, meaning that the Scottish Parliament's agreement is sought before the Scottish Government gives consent to the UK Government making secondary legislation in devolved competence. I refer members to paragraph 2 on page 13, which sets out the recommendations to the committee. Does any member have any comments on the recommendations or any aspect of the consent notification? Please raise your hand or type R in the chat box. Rachael Hamilton. I just wanted clarification from the minister why they had chosen to go along with the same policy as the UK. I believe that there's an issue in supply of some of the material for organic pollets. However, there's no explanation in here. Every time we do some legislation, there's never an explanation as to why the Scottish Government chose to not take a different route from the rest of the UK. I was just wanting some clarification on that, if I may. We can write for clarification on that. Any other comments? Is the committee content that the provision set out in the road vocation should be included in the proposed UKSI? Raise your hand or type N in the chat box. We do not agree otherwise. I'll presume that members are content. Thank you. We are content. Finally, is the committee content to delegate authority to me to sign off a letter to the Scottish Government informing it of our decision today? Thank you. That concludes our business in public and we now move into private session.