 And I've been through all of them, you know, 1990, excuse me, 1900 was released in 2000. Why? Because the fiber channel sand was coming around. And that was the architecture that was able to really connect all this multitude of servers to one storage device. And we kept evolving from there. And that put the stake down in terms of sand performance, didn't it? Exactly. All that with innovations around it, virtualization and attaching third-party devices. Correct. It is a continuous evolution of something that is generated by the user. What they are looking for. What is their problem? What we are trying, what can we help them? Rather than look at ourselves, we look at them as our guide, our direction. So how about, for the customers who are out there, what's available and when? I mean, things like mainframe support and tiering, do you know this offhand? I started off saying this is a touchy. We tend not to do slideware. What you saw on the stage right now is available. So the mainframe support is there. Clearly, we have announced that we will provide dynamic tiering and dynamic provisioning for the mainframe. It will be in the second version, so six months from now it will be there. Right now, we have delivered the USPV platform with dynamic tiering, with VAI integration, although it will follow in about 45, 60 days. We have some internal things. There are steps, a milestone that we haven't there to provide fiber channel over internet. That was an intentional shift of priority. We didn't see the market being ready for that. We decided to do that six months from now. Customers aren't screaming for FCE, but you know it's coming. You've got to be there. Exactly. So six months from now, the same machine that you bought today can be fit with that. There will be a second version of HTT. We are keeping evolving on that, but everything we have said on the stage is there. So sub-lunch tiering? Sub-lunch tiering as well. Did you talk about ham today? Is ham not available? We didn't take about the ham as part of that, it's also available in the next 90 days. And that's going to be part of the, I would presume part of the scale out piece of it. It's part of that. So the scale out and migration as well. Everything we saw today is near term, either available today or within, let's say, the next six months. 90 days to 180 days. Roberto, Jack was up there talking about obviously a lot of great messaging. We loved his performance. But one of the things he mentioned is the business model shift from past five to seven years. And specifically what I wanted to ask is software. Everyone's talking software. Software is the new IP that's driving the data, which is also the intellectual property of these big companies. Data is not a storage asset in the sense of data recovery, but it's actually critical to business using the data to innovate on. So talk about what's different now and what's your vision within the product platform around the role of software. Software has to provide that ease of use, is the first objective. You don't have an expanding staff available in the center anymore. Everyone I talk to, and believe me, I talk to hundreds of customers, everyone comes out with the same. They look around and say, we are the same that we were five years ago. So the first step that the software has to achieve is more automation, more control automation, a better understanding of what's going on. Because I use a lot to operate in the dark and not knowing what's going on. That's the first step. The first step, obviously, with this expanding amount of information that we have there is being able to track it. I was able to keep track ten years ago of what I had on my PC. I can't do today without a certain tool. I have too much things available, and that's just my personal information. Think about enterprise-wide, when you are a thousand and thousand of people that generate information. That is where the software comes in place. The software that manages the discovery, the allocation, and really all the automatic provisioning. You don't have to spend time to manually provision resources. That is where we are seeing that everywhere. It has to be, is that also in the future? On the future innovation, as you guys move forward and you're known for product leadership, how much is going to come from software versus hardware? Definitely, it's mostly coming from the software side. When I, as I said, I've done this product introduction for quite some time. Maybe you were among the first one. I keep saying that hardware is a reactive proposition right now. What is the technology that is available? You adopt that and you integrate with some of your AIP. The major effort is all on software. The technology is embedded software, like dynamic tiering, or is hot space software, or is something in between an appliance-based software. All the management, monitoring, provisioning part is done outside the box, but all the engine, the moving engine capability is only there. All the innovation, right? Exactly. But it's still a software development, a software evolution, so that's the key. On that note, we've been hearing the themes all across the past six months about agility and speed from the business model perspective, and also technology, so performance, speed, agility. Application developers, it's more complex for them. In the old days, it was like, okay, the application guys do their thing, they got their back-end data, they go to the network guys, they had the most siloed out, and they all shot bullets at each other, and they got along, drank beer together. But now, to be fast as a developer, you really got to abstract away the hardware and the network. Where is that going? Because in app developers, they're not going away. They're actually increasing on an increasing rate in the enterprise, and guys doing iTunes and iPad apps. So what's the future hold for these guys? Is it going to be completely black boxed for them in terms of storage, management? That is what we are trying to provide them. Make it invisible. Make it invisible. It's like we're saying, why do you have to worry about the amount of space that you have available, as long as it's available? We are trying to remove at least one layer between the storage administration and the application administration. Just make it transparent or invisible, like Dave said. So what are the challenges? Hold on Dave, one more follow-up question. What's the challenges that enterprises have as you talk to them about the applications and having these silos? Is it easy, is it kind of a new sheet of paper, or do they have to kind of migrate? What steps do they take? I think it will be quite transparent. It's mostly taking away internal process and procedures within an enterprise than the product. The product can really deliver that transparently. We're here with Roberto Basileo, Vice President of Storage Product Management at Hitachi Data Systems. Roberto, congratulations on this announcement. Terrific. It was great to have you in theCUBE. We'd love to have you back as an alum at some point in time. It's always a pleasure. Great to see you. I always do learn as well. Thanks for coming out.